On December 17, 2007 a
Answer
was filed
involving a dispute between
Professional Collection Consultants,
and
Does 1 To 10, Inclusive,
Long, Jules,
Long, Julian,
for COMMON COUNTS/OPEN BOOK ACCOUNT/COLLECTIONS
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
cc
San Francisco Superior Courts
Information Technology Group
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Jan-31-2008 12:27 pm
Case Number: CGC-07-470111
Filing Date: Jan-31-2008 12:26
Juke Box: 001 Image: 02012132
ANSWER
PROFESSIONAL COLLECTION CONSULTANTS VS. JULES LONG et al
001€02012132
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.658 Hearst Ave
San Francisco, Ca 94112
415-333-5042
In pro per
FIL
Superior Court of Caltomia
‘Gounty of San Francisco
JAN 3.1 2008
GORDON PagH, Clerk
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
9
10 LIMITED CIVIL DIVISION
PROFESSIONAL COLLECTION )
11 |) CONSULTANTS ) CASENO, 470111
. )
12 || Plaintiff, ) ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
13 |ly, }
)
4 s Leng )
|
Defendant. )
16
17 - :
dela
18 Defendant SOLESLONGAiowers plaintiff's complaint as follows:
19 Defendant denies each and every, all and singular, generally and specifically, the allegations
20 |) contained in the Complaint, and each and every part thereof. Defendant further denies that Plaintiff
21 || has been damaged in the sums alleged, or in any sum or sums whatsoever.
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
Plaintiff's actions are barred by the applicable statute of limitations including, but not limited
to, California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 337, 338, 339, 340, and 342 and Califomia Civil
Code Section 1783.
wy
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1-di
WHEREFORE, defendant, JULES LONG, prays that Plaintiff take nothing by this
complaint, that Defendant be awarded his costs of suit, including reasonable attorney’s fees; and for
such other and further relief as the Court may deem proper.
3
Dated: 1-22-2008PROOF OF SERVICE
Case Name: Professional Collection Consultants v. Long
Case No: 470111
I, the undersigned, declare that I am employed in the City and County of
San Francisco,
California. I am over the age of eighte nyears and not a party to the
within action. My address 35 LEP eg
3)
On January 22 2008, I served the following documents:
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
on the party addressed as follows:
Scott Wu
8726 D Sepulveda Bivd PMB 1321
Los Angeles Ca 90045
[x] BY MAIL by placing a true copy of each document listed above ina
sealed envelope addressed to the parties listed above and/or on the
attachment hereto and placing it for collection in my office for
deposit with the United States Postal Service. I am readily familiar
with the regular business practices of my office and attest that
envelopes so placed for collection are deposited on the same
business day with the United States Postal Service.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of
California that the foregoing ts true and correct. .
Ce ALS
Document Filed Date
January 31, 2008
Case Filing Date
December 17, 2007
Category
COMMON COUNTS/OPEN BOOK ACCOUNT/COLLECTIONS
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
cc San Francisco Superior Courts Information Technology Group Document Scanning Lead Sheet Jan-31-2008 12:27 pm Case Number: CGC-07-470111 Filing Date: Jan-31-2008 12:26 Juke Box: 001 Image: 02012132 ANSWER PROFESSIONAL COLLECTION CONSULTANTS VS. JULES LONG et al 001€02012132 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.658 Hearst Ave San Francisco, Ca 94112 415-333-5042 In pro per FIL Superior Court of Caltomia ‘Gounty of San Francisco JAN 3.1 2008 GORDON PagH, Clerk SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 10 LIMITED CIVIL DIVISION PROFESSIONAL COLLECTION ) 11 |) CONSULTANTS ) CASENO, 470111 . ) 12 || Plaintiff, ) ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 13 |ly, } ) 4 s Leng ) | Defendant. ) 16 17 - : dela 18 Defendant SOLESLONGAiowers plaintiff's complaint as follows: 19 Defendant denies each and every, all and singular, generally and specifically, the allegations 20 |) contained in the Complaint, and each and every part thereof. Defendant further denies that Plaintiff 21 || has been damaged in the sums alleged, or in any sum or sums whatsoever. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE Plaintiff's actions are barred by the applicable statute of limitations including, but not limited to, California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 337, 338, 339, 340, and 342 and Califomia Civil Code Section 1783. wy ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1-di WHEREFORE, defendant, JULES LONG, prays that Plaintiff take nothing by this complaint, that Defendant be awarded his costs of suit, including reasonable attorney’s fees; and for such other and further relief as the Court may deem proper. 3 Dated: 1-22-2008PROOF OF SERVICE Case Name: Professional Collection Consultants v. Long Case No: 470111 I, the undersigned, declare that I am employed in the City and County of San Francisco, California. I am over the age of eighte nyears and not a party to the within action. My address 35 LEP eg 3) On January 22 2008, I served the following documents: ANSWER TO COMPLAINT on the party addressed as follows: Scott Wu 8726 D Sepulveda Bivd PMB 1321 Los Angeles Ca 90045 [x] BY MAIL by placing a true copy of each document listed above ina sealed envelope addressed to the parties listed above and/or on the attachment hereto and placing it for collection in my office for deposit with the United States Postal Service. I am readily familiar with the regular business practices of my office and attest that envelopes so placed for collection are deposited on the same business day with the United States Postal Service. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing ts true and correct. . Ce ALS