On May 19, 2005 a
Party Discovery
was filed
involving a dispute between
San Francisco Housing Authority,
and
Does 1-10,
King, Janale,
for UNLAWFUL DETAINER - RESIDENTIAL
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
ADOC
San Francisco Superior Courts
Information Technology Group
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Jun-10-2005 1:57 pm
Case Number: CUD-05-614290
Filing Date: Jun-10-2005 1:53
Juke Box: 001 Image: 01218491
LERKS JUDGMENT - UNLAWFUL DETAINER - POSSESSION ONL
SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY VS. JANALE KING et al
001001218491
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.UD-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, state bar number, and address): ‘et FOR COURT USE ONLY
Arnold W. Evje II (State Bar # #095124)
{Arnold W. Evje II, Esq.
950 Oak Street .
San Francisco , California 94117
TELEPHONE NO: (415) 861-6070 —FAXNO. (Option) (415) 861-6073
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional):
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): San Francisco Housing Authority
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
street aooress: 400 Mc Allister Street
MAILING aDoREss: 40() McAllister Street
crTy AND ZIP CODE: San Francisco 94102
BRANCH NAME: Superior Court - Limited Jurisdiction
PLAINTIFF: San Francisco Housing Authority
DEFENDANT: Janale King
JUDGMENT—UNLAWFUL DETAINER CASE NUMBER:
(x) By clerk Cx) g, C2) After Court Trial
y Default fer Court Trial
Cc) By Court CG Possession Only Co Defendant Did Not 614290
Appear at Trial
JUDGMENT
1. CX] By DEFAULT
a. Defendant was properly served with a copy of the summons and complaint.
b. Defendant failed to answer the complaint or appear and defend the action within the time allowed by law.
c. Defendant's default was entered by the clerk upon plaintiff's application.
d. (X] Clerk's Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 1169). For possession only of the premises described on page 2 (item 4).
e
. Cc) Court Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(b)). The court considered
a) plaintiff's testimony and other evidence.
(2)C_] plaintiff's or others’ written declaration and evidence (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(d)).
2. [7] AFTER COURT TRIAL. The jury was waived. The court considered the evidence.
a. The case was tried on (date and time):
before (name of judicial officer):
b. Appearances by:
[1 Plaintiff (name each): (7) Plaintiffs attorney (name each):
(1)
(2)
CI Continued on Attachment 2b (form MC-025).
[] Defendant (name each): [] Defendant's attomey (name each):
(1)
(2)
(—] Continued on Attachment 2b (form MC-025).
c. [_] Defendant did not appear at trial, Defendant was properly served with notice of trial,
d. [_] A statement of decision (Code Civ. Proc., § 632) [_] was not [7] was requested.
Page 1 of 2
reel Cone ee JUDGMENT—UNLAWFUL DETAINER Code of Givi Procedure, §§ 415.46,
585(d), 664.6, 1169
UD-110 [New January 1, 2003),
LexisNexis® Automated California Judicial Council FormsPLAINTIFF: San Francisco Housing Authority, et al. “on NUMBER
614290
DEFENDANT: Janale King, et al.
JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AS FOLLOWS BY: [7] THE court (x) THE CLERK
3. Parties. Judgment is
for plaintiff (name each):
San Francisco Housing Authority
and against defendant (name each):
- Janale King
() Continued on Attachment 3a (form MC-025).
b. [J for defendant (name each):
4. [X] Plaintift ([] Defendant is entitled to possession of the premises located at (street address, apartment, city, and county):
Z 2474 Griffith Street, San Francisco, CA 94124
5. KI] Judgment applies to all occupants of the premises including tenants, subtenants if any, and named claimants if any (Code Civ.
Proc., §§ 715.010, 1169, and 1 174.3),
6. Amount and terms of judgment
a. [_] Defendant named in item 3a above must Pay plaintiff on the = b. [1] Praintiff is to receive nothing from defendant
complaint: named in item 3b.
(1) £7) Past-due rent $ LC) coon named in item 3b is to recover
2 £4 Holdover damages $ [[) and attorney fees: $
(3) [2] Attorney fees $
(4) [1 costs $
(8) LJ Other (specify): $
(6) TOTAL JUDGMENT $
The rental agreement is canceled. [X_] The lease is forfeited.
7. [J Conditional judgment. Plaintiff has breached the agreement to provide habitable premises to defendant as stated in
Judgment—Unlawful Detainer Attachment (form UD-1108), which is attached.
8. [J] other (specify):
CC] Continued on Attachment 8 (form MC-025).
Date: CI
JUDICIAL OFFICER
JUN 1 0 2005
Date: CO Clerk, by___RRobatf _ Deputy
7
(SEAL) CLERK'S CERTIFICATE (Optional)
| certify that this is a true Copy of the original judgment on file in the court.
Date:
Clerk, by , Deputy
UP-T10 [New January 1, 2003] JUDGMENT—UNLAWFUL DETAINER Page 2 of 2
LexisNexts® Automated California Judicial Council Forms
Document Filed Date
June 10, 2005
Case Filing Date
May 19, 2005
Category
UNLAWFUL DETAINER - RESIDENTIAL
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.