Stipulation,Agreement: MAY WONG VS. BAGOOD, LEAH ZUNIGA A.K.A LEAH ZUNIGA A.K.A. LEAH ET AL

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                IU

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Feb-11-2015 10:32 am

Case Number: CUD-15-651332
Filing Date: Feb-11-2015 10:30
’ Filed by: MELANIA DE LUNA
Juke Box: 001 Image: 04790155
DECLARATION

MAY WONG VS. BAGOOD, LEAH ZUNIGA A.K.A LEAH ZUNIGA A.K.A. LEAH ET
AL

001004790155

Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.|) Attorneys for Plaintiff -

Steven C. Williams, Esq., SBN 202988
Fried & Williams LLP

177 Post Street, Suite 800

San Francisco CA 94108

(415) 421-0100 .
swilliams@friedwilliams.com

.May Wong

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA
IN AND FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

LIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION
May Wong, No. CUD-15-651332
Plaintiff,
DECLARATION re:
v. LOST ORIGINAL RENTAL

AGREEMENT IN SUPPORT OF
Leah Zuniga Bagood a.k.a. Leah Zuniga | ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND CLERK'S
a.k.a. Leah Marie Bagood, JUDGMENT FOR RESTITUTION OF
and Does 1 to 20, inclusive, THE PREMISES ONLY (CCP §1169)

Defendants. [Lost original lease.]

I, the undersigned, declare that:

1. Iam the attorney of record for Plaintiff May Wong in the above-entitled action.
The premises are located at 624 Naples Street, San Francisco, CA 94112. ,

2. Defendant Leah Zuniga Bagood a.k.a. Leah Zuniga a-k.a. Leah Marie Bagood
(hereafter "Defendant") failed to file a responsive pleading prior to Plaintiff's request for
entry of default.

3. The original summons and proofs of service for Defendant have been filed with
the Court. Each proof of service states the method of service. Said proofs of service are
incorporated herein.

4. A copy of the notice to vacate served on Defendant has been filed with the

1

Declaration in support of entry of default.Court as an exhibit to the complaint. Defendant was served with the notice on J anuary
21, 2015 . The notice period expired on January 26, 2015.

5. Plaintiff is the owner of the premises.

6. Plaintiff's lease with Defendant is written but unavailable (see attached
Declaration). The original lease or rental agreement between the parties in this action has
been lost or cannot be obtained at this-time.

7. Plaintiff rented to Defendant at the rate of $1,650.00 per month.

8. Defendant is in default in rent for the following rental periods: January 1, 2015
through January 31, 2015.

9. Plaintiff is holding a last month's rent or security deposit in the amount of
$1,650.00. Disposition: per Civil Code Section 1950.5(g).

10. Defendant failed to comply with the notice to vacate. Defendant is still in
possession.

11. The premises are subject to the San Francisco Residential Rent Stabilization
and Arbitration Ordinance. A copy of the Notice served on Defendant was not filed with
the Rent Board because there is no requirement to do so. A copy of the notice is on file in
this action.

I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct, and if
sworn as a witness, I can testify competently thereto. Executed on February 10, 2015 at
Oakland, California.

Fried & Williams LLP

Goa, -

by Matthew P, Quiring,
Attorneys for Plaintiff May Wong

2

Declaration in support of entry of default.