On November 03, 2005 a
Party Discovery
was filed
involving a dispute between
San Francisco Housing Authority,
and
Does 1-10 Inclusive,
Johnson, Beverly,
for UNLAWFUL DETAINER - RESIDENTIAL
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
OOO
San Francisco Superior Courts
Information Technology Group
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Dec-20-2005 1:35 pm
Case Number: CUD-05-616325
Filing Date: Dec-20-2005 1:33
Juke Box: 001 Image: 01348652
PPLICATION TO THE CLERK FOR JUDGMENT UNDER SEC 1169
SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY VS. BEVERLY JOHNSON et al
001001348652
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.= UD-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, state bar number, and address):
Amold W. Evje II (State Bar # #095124)
t- Arnold W. Evje II, Esq.
950 Oak Street
San Francisco , California 9411
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional):
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): San Francisco Housing Authorit
street aporess: 400 Mc Allister Street
matuine aporess: 400 McAllister Street
cry ano zie cove: San Francisco 94102
LL arancu Name: Superior Court - Limited Jurisdiction
7
TELEPHONE NO-(415) 861-6070 —FAxNo.(Optonay: (415) 861-6073 FILED.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO DEC 2 0 2005
FOR COURT USE ONLY
GORDON LoL be Clerk
BY: ar
PLAINTIFF: San Francisco Housing Authority
DEFENDANT: Beverly Johnson
JUDGMENT—UNLAWFUL DETAINER ‘CASE NUMBER:
Gd By Clerk Co p. [J after Court Trial
y Default ourt Trial
| By Court (J Possession Only [__] Defendant Did Not 616325
Appear at Trial
JUDGMENT
1. [x] BY DEFAULT
a. Defendant was properly served with a copy of the summons and complaint.
b. Defendant failed to answer the complaint or appear and defend the action within the time allowed by law.
c. Defendant's default was entered by the clerk upon plaintiff's application.
d. [Xx] Clerk's Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 1169). For
possession only of the premises described on page 2 (item 4).
e. Court Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(b)). The court considered
wld plaintiff's testimony and other evidence.
(2) [1 plaintiffs or others' written declaration and evidence (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(d)).
2. [7] AFTER COURT TRIAL. The jury was waived. The court considered the evidence.
a. The case was tried on (date and time):
before (name of judicial officer):
b. Appearances by:
{] Plaintiff (name each):
[1 Continued on Attachment 2b (form MC-025).
[__] Defendant (name each):
[] Continued on Attachment 2b (form MC-028).
[] Plaintitt's attorney (name each):
(1)
(2)
[] Defendant's attorney (name each):
(1)
(2)
c. [_] Defendant did not appear at trial. Defendant was properly served with notice of trial.
d. [_] Astatement of decision (Code Civ. Proc., § 632)
[—] wasnot [__] was requested.
Page 1 of 2
Fo Ee eon eaoria JUDGMENT—UNLAWFUL DETAINER Code of Givi Procedure, §§ 415.45,
UD-110 [New January 1, 2003]
585(d), 664.6, 1169
LexisNexis Automated California Judicial Council Forms~ _
[ PLAINTIFF: San Francisco Housing Authority, et al. ‘CASE NUMBER:
Of
616325
EFENDANT: Beverly Johnson, et al.
JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AS FOLLOWS BY: (-) THE court THE CLERK
3. Parties. Judgment is
a. [X] for plaintiff (name each):
San Francisco Housing Authority
and against defendant (name each):
Beverly Johnson
[1] Continued on Attachment 3a (form MC-025).
b. for defendant (name each):
4. [3] Piaintitt [] Defendant is entitled to possession of the premises located at (street address, apartment, city, and county):
1880 Sunnydale Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94134
5. [X] Judgment applies to all occupants of the premises including tenants, subtenants if any, and named claimants if any (Code Civ.
Proc., §§ 715.010, 1169, and 1174.3).
6. Amount and terms of judgment
a. [[_] Defendant named in item 3a above must pay plaintiff onthe b. (1) Plaintiff is to receive nothing from defendant
complaint: named in item 3b.
D 4 i
Past-due rent Perens named in item 3b is to recover
Holdover damages and attorney fees: $
Attorney fees
Costs
Other (specify):
(6) TOTAL JUDGMENT
c. [X] The rental agreement is canceled. [X] The lease is forfeited.
7. CI Conditional judgment. Plaintiff has breached the agreement to provide habitable premises to defendant as stated in
Judgment—Unlawtul Detainer Attachment (form UD-110S), which is attached.
8. [J other (specify):
[J] Continued on Attachment 8 (form MC-025).
Date: CI
pate: DEC 2 0 2006 CX) clerk, by Deputy
(SEAL) CLERK'S CERTIFI
\ certify that this is a true copy Of the original judgment on file in the cou
Date:
Clerk, by , Deputy
UD-110 [New January 1, 2003} JUDGMENT—UNLAWFUL DETAINER Page 2 of 2
LexisNexis® Automated California Judicial Council Forms
Document Filed Date
December 20, 2005
Case Filing Date
November 03, 2005
Category
UNLAWFUL DETAINER - RESIDENTIAL
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.