arrow left
arrow right
  • SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY VS. HELISHIA TONEY et al UNLAWFUL DETAINER - RESIDENTIAL document preview
  • SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY VS. HELISHIA TONEY et al UNLAWFUL DETAINER - RESIDENTIAL document preview
  • SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY VS. HELISHIA TONEY et al UNLAWFUL DETAINER - RESIDENTIAL document preview
  • SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY VS. HELISHIA TONEY et al UNLAWFUL DETAINER - RESIDENTIAL document preview
  • SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY VS. HELISHIA TONEY et al UNLAWFUL DETAINER - RESIDENTIAL document preview
  • SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY VS. HELISHIA TONEY et al UNLAWFUL DETAINER - RESIDENTIAL document preview
						
                                

Preview

ICO San Francisco Superior Courts Information Technology Group Document Scanning Lead Sheet Mar-18-2005 4:22 pm Case Number: CUD-05-613502 Filing Date: Mar-18-2005 4:21 Juke Box: 001 Image: 01161081 DEMAND FOR JURY SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY VS. HELISHIA TONEY et al 001001161081 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.ant nu a YN = Ye N NY N WYN NNR Rm mm meee Soy naner WM HE SCO MN ANAHNHE SONY C € HELISHIA TONEY 42 Santos Street San Francisco, CA 94134 FILLE Duo (415) 240-5189 MAR 18 200qHAR 18 2005 Defendant In Pro. Per. GORDON PA Clerk BY: bene Ah : puty Cler! SUPERIOR COURT -- LIMITED JURISDICTION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING No. 613502 AUTHORITY, Plaintiff DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL AND MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE HELISHIA TONEY, et al., Defendants Defendant HELISHIA TONEY hereby demands a trial by jury of all issues and a mandatory settlement conference in the above-entitled case. . x Dated: March 18, 2005 \elasan Tow) HELISHIA TONEY Defendant In Pro. Per. Trial Date: Not yet set Jury Demand© ONAN & BW N = vN NY NY N NM NON ORD mmm et oN A UM ha weNMY SB SE MAI ANH AWN = S Cc C HELISHIA TONEY 42 Santos Street San Francisco, CA 94134 PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL CASE NAME: SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY v. TONEY, et al. CASE NO.: 613502 I, Adar Motrson , declare as follows: I am employed within the City and County of San Francisco. My business address is EVICTION DEFENSE COLLABORATIVE, 433 South Van Ness Avenue, San Francisco, California 94103. I am over the age of eighteen (18) years of age and not a party to the within action. I am readily familiar with the EVICTION DEFENSE COLLABORATIVE's practice for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. Correspondence so collected and processed is deposited with the United States Postal Service that same day in the ordinary course of business. On March 18, 2005, in accordance with Code of Civil: Procedure Section 1013a (3), I served the following: Answer and Gury Denan® upon PLAINTIFF SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY, by placing the same at the EVICTION DEFENSE COLLABORATIVE for deposit in the United States Postal Service on that date in an envelope addressed as follows: Arnold W. Evje II, Esq. 950 Oak Street San Francisco, CA 94117 I sealed the envelope and placed it for collection and mailing on that date following ordinary business practices, in the City and County of San Francisco, California. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on March 18, 2005 at San Francisco, California. Proof of Service by Mail