Party Discovery: SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY VS. ELISE GRANT et al

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                OMAN

San Francisco Superior Courts
Information Technology Group

Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Apr-13-2005 10:50 am

Case Number: CUD-05-613659
Filing Date: Apr-13-2005 10:41
Juke Box: 001 Image: 01177270
LERKS JUDGMENT - UNLAWFUL DETAINER - POSSESSION ONL

SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY VS. ELISE GRANT et al

001001177270

Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.UD-110
he FOR COURT USE ONLY

ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, staf number, and: address):

Amold W. Evje II (State Bar # #095124)
L Arnold W, Evje Il, Esq.
San Pan oise0 California 94117

a
a rae AS UE19) 861-6070 FAKNO. anor (415) 861-6073 F
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional) . San Fran; a D
‘ATTORNEY FOR (name): San Francisco Housing Authorit} taty Superior Court
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO APR 13 2005

staeet aopress: 400 Mc Allister Street

matting aooress: 400 McAllister Street GORDO} Park.
cry ano zi cove: San Francisco 94102 oo BY: Clerk

BRANCH NAME: Superior Court - Limited Jurisdiction Deputy Clerk

PLAINTIFF: San Francisco Housing Authority
DEFENDANT: Elise Grant
JUDGMENT—UNLAWFUL DETAINER CASE NUMBER
(Gc) By Clerk od By Default After Court Trial
[_) By Court [x] Possession Only Defendant Did Not 613659
Appear at Trial |
JUDGMENT
1. DX] BY DEFAULT

Defendant was properly served with a copy of the summons and complaint.

b. Defendant failed to answer the complaint or appear and defend the action within the time allowed by law.

c. Defendant's default was entered by the clerk upon plaintiff's application.

d. [Xx] Clerk's Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 1169). For possession only of the premises described on page 2 (item 4).
e.

. CI Court Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(b)). The court considered
(1) oo plaintiff's testimony and other evidence.
(2)[] plaintiff's or others' written declaration and evidence (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(d)).

»

2. [__] AFTER COURT TRIAL. The jury was waived. The court considered the evidence.
a. The case was tried on (date and time):
before (name of judicial officer):

b. Appearances by:
[1] Plaintiff (name each): (] Plaintiff's attorney (name each):

(1)
(2)

[] Continued on Attachment 2b (form MC-025).

[) Detendant's attorney (name each):
(1)
(2)

Defendant (name each):

(1 Continued on Attachment 2b (form MC-025).

c. [__] Defendant did not appear at trial. Defendant was properly served with notice of trial.

d. [__] Astatement of decision (Code Civ. Proc., § 632) [ was not was requested.
Page 1 of 2
Form Approved for Optional Use il
JUDGMENT—UNLAWFUL DETAINER Co oat, 108

‘Judicial Council of California
UD-110 [New January 1, 2003]
LexisNexis® Automated California Judicial Council FormsPLAINTIFF: San Francisco Housing-