On March 22, 2019 a
AFFIDAVIT - AOS- DiMaulo
was filed
involving a dispute between
Delfina Warrick,
and
Osric King,
for Matrimonial - Uncontested
in the District Court of Kings County.
Preview
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 07/22/2019 12:59 PM INDEX NO. 514359/2019
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/22/2019
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Attorney: THE LA
COUNTY OF KINGS
The papers se
MUBASSHAR AHMAD
date of filing.
Plaintiff(s)
Index # 514359/2
- against -
Purchased Jun
FRANK A. DIMAULO
Defendant(s)
AFFIDAVIT O
STATE OF NEW YORK: COUNTY OF NEW YORK ss:
DAVID KLEINBERG BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND SAYS DEPONENT IS NOT A PARTY TO THIS
AGE OF EiGHTEEN YEARS AND RESIDES IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
That on July 17, 2019 at 12:06 PM at
14 EAST ROGUES PATH
HUNTINGTON STATION, NY 11746
deponent served the within SUMMONS AND VERIFIED COMPLAINT WITH NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING
FRANK A. DIMAULO therein named,
AFFlXING affixing a true copy of each to the door of said premises, which is the Defendant's dwelling
by
TO DOOR abode within the state. Deponent was unable, with due diligence to find the Defendant or a
discretion, thereat, having called there on:
July 9, 2019 AT 6:05 PM July 13, 2019 AT 7:29 AM
July 17, 2019 AT 12:06 PM
MAILING Deponent enclosed a copy of same in a postpaid wrapper properly addressed to the Defendan
last known residence at
14 EAST ROGUES PATH
HUNTINGTON STATION, NY 11746
and deposited said wrapper in a post office or official depcsitcry under exclusive care and
States Postal Service within New York State on July 18, 2019 by REGULAR FIRST CLASS
marked PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL and not indicating on the outside thereof, by return
that the communication is from an attorney or concerns an action against the person to be
Spoke with MR. TUOZZO, NEIGHBOR at 19 EAST ROGUES PATH HUNTINGTON STATION
the Defendant lives at the afforementioned address but was unable to divulge the Defendant's
MILITARY Person spoken to was asked whether the Defendant was in the military service of the State
SERVICE States and received a negative reply. Upon information and belief based upon the conversation
aforesaid deponent avers that the Defendant is not in the military service of the State of Ne
as that term is defined in the statutes of the State of New York or the Federal Soldiers and
1 of 1
Category
Matrimonial - Uncontested
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 07/22/2019 12:59 PM INDEX NO. 514359/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/22/2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Attorney: THE LA COUNTY OF KINGS The papers se MUBASSHAR AHMAD date of filing. Plaintiff(s) Index # 514359/2 - against - Purchased Jun FRANK A. DIMAULO Defendant(s) AFFIDAVIT O STATE OF NEW YORK: COUNTY OF NEW YORK ss: DAVID KLEINBERG BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND SAYS DEPONENT IS NOT A PARTY TO THIS AGE OF EiGHTEEN YEARS AND RESIDES IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK. That on July 17, 2019 at 12:06 PM at 14 EAST ROGUES PATH HUNTINGTON STATION, NY 11746 deponent served the within SUMMONS AND VERIFIED COMPLAINT WITH NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING FRANK A. DIMAULO therein named, AFFlXING affixing a true copy of each to the door of said premises, which is the Defendant's dwelling by TO DOOR abode within the state. Deponent was unable, with due diligence to find the Defendant or a discretion, thereat, having called there on: July 9, 2019 AT 6:05 PM July 13, 2019 AT 7:29 AM July 17, 2019 AT 12:06 PM MAILING Deponent enclosed a copy of same in a postpaid wrapper properly addressed to the Defendan last known residence at 14 EAST ROGUES PATH HUNTINGTON STATION, NY 11746 and deposited said wrapper in a post office or official depcsitcry under exclusive care and States Postal Service within New York State on July 18, 2019 by REGULAR FIRST CLASS marked PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL and not indicating on the outside thereof, by return that the communication is from an attorney or concerns an action against the person to be Spoke with MR. TUOZZO, NEIGHBOR at 19 EAST ROGUES PATH HUNTINGTON STATION the Defendant lives at the afforementioned address but was unable to divulge the Defendant's MILITARY Person spoken to was asked whether the Defendant was in the military service of the State SERVICE States and received a negative reply. Upon information and belief based upon the conversation aforesaid deponent avers that the Defendant is not in the military service of the State of Ne as that term is defined in the statutes of the State of New York or the Federal Soldiers and 1 of 1