arrow left
arrow right
  • Frederic Gillet v. Inder, Llc, John Doe said name being fictitious and unknownTorts - Motor Vehicle document preview
  • Frederic Gillet v. Inder, Llc, John Doe said name being fictitious and unknownTorts - Motor Vehicle document preview
  • Frederic Gillet v. Inder, Llc, John Doe said name being fictitious and unknownTorts - Motor Vehicle document preview
  • Frederic Gillet v. Inder, Llc, John Doe said name being fictitious and unknownTorts - Motor Vehicle document preview
  • Frederic Gillet v. Inder, Llc, John Doe said name being fictitious and unknownTorts - Motor Vehicle document preview
  • Frederic Gillet v. Inder, Llc, John Doe said name being fictitious and unknownTorts - Motor Vehicle document preview
  • Frederic Gillet v. Inder, Llc, John Doe said name being fictitious and unknownTorts - Motor Vehicle document preview
  • Frederic Gillet v. Inder, Llc, John Doe said name being fictitious and unknownTorts - Motor Vehicle document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/16/2022 01:16 PM INDEX NO. 157968/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/16/2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK SUMMONS __________________________________________- __________Ç FREDERIC GILLET, Plaintiff(s) designates NEW YORK County as the place of trial. Plaintiff(s), -against- The basis of the venue is: Location of Incident INDER, LLC, and "JOHN DOE", said name being fictitious and unknown, Index No.: Defendants(s). Date Summons & -----------------------------------------------------------------X Complaint Filed: To the above named Defendants(s): YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED to answer the complaint in this action and to serve a copy of your Answer, or, if the Complaint is not served with this Summons, to serve a notice of appearance on the Plaintiff s Attorneys within 20 days after the service of this Summons, exclusive of the day of service, where service is made by delivery upon you personally within the state,or within 30 days after completion of service where service is made in any other manner. In case of your failure to appear or answer, judgment will be taken against you by default for the relief demanded in the complaint. Dated: New York, New York September 16, 2022 Yours, etc., BUITRAGO &-ASSOCIA ÉS, PL C By: MARCELO A. BUITRAG , ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) 274 Madispn Av n(e'- Suite 801 New Yo ew York 10016 (646) 858-0088 TO: INDER, LLC 130 Brenner Avenue Bethpage, New York 11714 AND VIA SECRETARY OF STATE 1 of 10 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/16/2022 01:16 PM INDEX NO. 157968/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/16/2022 DOE" "JOHN C/o INDER, LLC 130 Brenner Avenue Bethpage, New York 11714 AND VIA SECRETARY OF STATE 2 of 10 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/16/2022 01:16 PM INDEX NO. 157968/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/16/2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------..-----------------------X FREDERIC GILLET, Index No.: Plaintiff(s), -against- VERIFIED COMPLAINT INDER, LLC, and "JOHN DOE", said name being fictitious and unknown, Defendant(s). -----------------------------------------------...---------X Plaintiff, by his attorneys, BUITRAGO & ASSOCIATES, PLLC, as and for the plaintiff's Verified Complaint allege the following, upon information and belief and at all times hereinafter mentioned: 1. At all times hereinafter mentioned, the plaintiff, FREDERIC GILLET, was and still is a resident of the County of Jersey City and State of New Jersey. 2. At all times herein mentioned, defendant, "JOHN DOE", was and stillis a resident of the State of New York. 3. At all times herein mentioned, defendant, INDER, LLC, maintains a place of business in the County of Nassau and State of New York. 4. The cause of action herein allegedly arose in the State of New York, County of New York. 5. The limitations on liability set forth in CPLR Section 1601 do not apply. 6. The limitations on liability set forth in CPLR Section 1601 do not apply by one or more of the exemptions thereto set forth in CPLR Section 1602. 3 of 10 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/16/2022 01:16 PM INDEX NO. 157968/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/16/2022 7. That this action falls within one or more of the exceptions as set forth in CPLR §1602, §1602(1), §1602(2), §1602(3), §1602(4), §'1602(5), §1602(6), §1602(7), §1602(8), §1602(9), §1602(10), §1602(11), §1602(12), and §1603 of the State of New York. 8. On August 5, 2022, and alltimes hereinafter mentioned the defendant, INDER, LLC, was and stillis a domestic corporation, duly authorized to do, transact and/or conduct business in the State of New York, pursuant to the laws of The State of New York. 9. On August 5, 2022, and alltimes hereinafter mentioned the defendant, INDER, LLC, was and stillis a foreign corporation, duly authorized to do, transact and/or conduct business in the State of New York, pursuant to the laws of The State of New York. 10. On August 5, 2022, and alltimes hereinafter mentioned the defendant, INDER, LLC, maintained and stillmaintains a principle place of business in the County of Nassau, State of New York. 11. On August 5, 2022, and all times hereinafter mentioned the defendant, "JOHN DOE" was operating a motor vehicle bearing New York State registration number Y100413C, while acting within the course of his employment for Defendant, INDER, LLC. 12. On August 5, 2022, and at all times hereinafter mentioned the defendant, INDER, LLC, was the owner of a motor vehicle bearing New York State registration number Y100413C. 13. On August 5, 2022, and at alltimes hereinafter mentioned the defendant, "JOHN DOE", was the lessee of a motor vehicle bearing New York State registration number Y100413C. 14. On August 5, 2022, and at alltimes hereinafter mentioned the defendant, "JOHN DOE", was the operator of the aforesaid motor vehicle bearing New York State registration number Y100413C. 4 of 10 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/16/2022 01:16 PM INDEX NO. 157968/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/16/2022 15. On August 5, 2022, and at all times hereinafter mentioned, defendant, "JOHN DOE", operated the aforesaid motor vehicle with the knowledge of defendant, INDER, LLC. 16. On August 5, 2022, and at all times hereinafter mentioned, defendant, "JOHN DOE", operated the aforesaid motor vehicle with the consent of defendant, INDER, LLC. 17. On August 5, 2022, and at all times hereinafter mentioned, defendant, "JOHN DOE", operated the aforesaid motor vehicle with the permission of defendant, INDER, LLC. DOE" 18. On August 5, 2022 and at alltimes hereinafter mentioned, defendant, "JOHN managed the aforesaid motor vehicle. 19. On August 5, 2022, and at all times hereinafter mentioned, defendant, INDER, LLC, managed the aforesaid motor vehicle. 20. On August 5, 2022, and at all times hereinafter mentioned, the defendant, "JOHN DOE", maintained the aforesaid motor vehicle. 21. On August 5, 2022, and at alltimes hereinafter mentioned, the defendant, INDER, LLC, maintained the aforesaid motor vehicle. 22. On August 5, 2022, and all times hereinafter mentioned, the defendant, "JOHN DOE", controlled the aforesaid motor vehicle. 23. On August 5, 2022, and all times hereinafter mentioned, the defendant, INDER, LLC, controlled the aforesaid motor vehicle. 24. On August 5, 2022, and all times hereinafter mentioned, the defendant, "JOHN DOE", repaired the aforesaid motor vehicle. 25. On August 5, 2022, and all times hereinafter mentioned, the defendant, INDER, LLC, repaired the aforesaid motor vehicle. 5 of 10 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/16/2022 01:16 PM INDEX NO. 157968/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/16/2022 9th 45th 27. On August 5, 2022 and all times hereinafter mentioned, Avenue and West Street, in the County of New York, State of New York were public roadways and/or thoroughfares. DOE" 28. On August 5, 2022, the motor vehicle operated by defendant "JOHN and the motorcycle operated by plaintiff, FREDERIC GILLET were in contact. DOE" 29. On August 5, 2022, the motor vehicle operated by defendant "JOHN and the 9th motorcycle operated by plaintiff, FREDERIC GILLET were in contact on Avenue and West 45th street, in the County of New York, and State of New York. 30. That as a result of the aforesaid contact, plaintiff, FREDERIC GILLET, was injured. 31. That as a result of the aforesaid contact, plaintiff, FREDERIC GILLET, was seriously injured. 32. That the aforesaid occurrence was caused wholly and solely by reason of the negligence of the defendants without any fault or negligence on the part of the plaintiff contributing thereto. 33. The defendant(s) was/were negligent, careless, reckless, grossly negligent and inherently reckless in the ownership, operation, management, control, supervision, and maintenance of their motor vehicle. 34. That by reason of the foregoing, plaintiff, FREDERIC GILLET, sustained severe, serious and permanent personal injuries, became sick, sore, lame and disabled; suffered injuries to the nervous system; suffered a fracture; suffered permanent disfigurement; suffered mental anguish, was confined to hospital, bed and home and may, in the future, be so confined; 6 of 10 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/16/2022 01:16 PM INDEX NO. 157968/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/16/2022 was incapacitated from attending her usual duties and vocation and may in the future, be so incapacitated; will suffer a loss and/or limitation; suffered permanent limitations; suffered significant limitations; and plaintiff, FREDERIC GILLET, was otherwise damaged. 35. That plaintiff, FREDERIC GILLET has sustained serious injuries as defmed in Subdivision D of §5102 of the Insurance Law-Recodification of the State of New York. 36. That plaintiff, FREDERIC GILLET, has sustained serious injuries and economic loss greater than basic economic loss as to satisfy the exception of §5104 of the Insurance law of the State of New York. 37. That plaintiff, FREDERIC GILLET, is not seeking to recover any damages for which plaintiff has been reimbursed by no-fault insurance and/or for which no-fault insurance is obligated to reimburse plaintiff. Plaintiff is only seeking to recover those damages not recoverable through no-fault insurance under the facts and circumstances in this action. 38. That by reason of the foregoing, plaintiff, FREDERIC GILLET, has been damaged in an amount which exceeds the jurisdictional limits of all lower courts which would otherwise have jurisdiction. WHEREFORE, plaintiffs demand judgment against the defendant in an amount that exceeds the jurisdictional limits of the lower Courts which would otherwise have jurisdiction, all together with the costs and disbursements of these actions. Dated: New York, New York September 16, 2022 Yours, etc., BUITRAGO & ASSOCIATES, PLLC 7 of 10 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/16/2022 01:16 PM INDEX NO. 157968/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/16/2022 By: MARCELO A. BUITRAGO Q. Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) 274 Madison ite 801 Avenuy New York, Ne Y6rk 10016 (646) 858,0 8 8 of 10 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/16/2022 01:16 PM INDEX NO. 157968/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/16/2022 ATTORNEY'S VERIFICATION The undersigned, an attorney admitted to practice in the Courts of the State of New York, hereby affirms the following to be true under the penalties of perjury: I, MARCELO A. BUITRAGO, ESQ., attorney for the plaintiffs in the within action have read the foregoing COMPLAINT and know the contents thereof; that the same is true to my own knowledge, except as to those matters therein stated to be alleged upon information and belief, and that as to those matters, your affirmant believes it to be true. The grounds of your affirmant's knowledge are investigations received by your affirmant. The reason that this verification is made by your affirmant and not by the plaintiffs is that the plaintiffs are not within the County wherein your affirmant's offices are located. Dated: New York, New York September 16, 2022 MARCELO A. BUITRA O, ESQ. 9 of 10 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/16/2022 01:16 PM INDEX NO. 157968/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/16/2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK __________________-------------______________--------__________Ç FREDERIC GILLET, Index No.: Plaintiff(s), -against- INDER, LLC, and "JOHN DOE", said name being fictitious and unknown, Defendant(s). SUMMONS and VERIFIED COMPLAINT BUITRAGO & ASSOCIATES, PLLC 274 Madison Avenue - Suite 801 New York, New York 10016 (646) 858-0088 Service of a copy of the within is hereby admitted: Dated: 10 of 10