arrow left
arrow right
  • LA COMMERCIAL GROUP, INC. A CORPORATION DBA VS. WALID AHMED MEFTAH ET AL EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) document preview
  • LA COMMERCIAL GROUP, INC. A CORPORATION DBA VS. WALID AHMED MEFTAH ET AL EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) document preview
  • LA COMMERCIAL GROUP, INC. A CORPORATION DBA VS. WALID AHMED MEFTAH ET AL EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) document preview
  • LA COMMERCIAL GROUP, INC. A CORPORATION DBA VS. WALID AHMED MEFTAH ET AL EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) document preview
  • LA COMMERCIAL GROUP, INC. A CORPORATION DBA VS. WALID AHMED MEFTAH ET AL EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) document preview
  • LA COMMERCIAL GROUP, INC. A CORPORATION DBA VS. WALID AHMED MEFTAH ET AL EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) document preview
						
                                

Preview

WANE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Jun-09-2016 3:14 pm Case Number: CGC-16-550755 Filing Date: Jun-09-2016 3:10 Filed by: NADITA MASON Image: 05430824 COURT JUDGMENT - GENERAL LA COMMERCIAL GROUP, INC. A CORPORATION DBA VS. WALID AHMED MEFTAH ET AL 001005430824 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT-ATTORNEY (Name, siate bar number, and aadress): JESSICA L. LEMOINE Bar No. 128567 Attorney at Law 317 So. Brand Bivd,, Glendale, CA 91204-1702 Mailing address: BLO. Box 251450, Glendale, CA 91225 TRLEPHONENO: (818) 543-5999 FAKNO (Options): (818) 551-6829 E-MAIL-ADDRESS (Optional): . ATTORNEY.FOR (vena): Plaintiff, L.A. COMMERCIAL GROUP, INC. JUD-100 ig ONLY SUPERIOR C SOUNTY OF SAN PRAnCSCO 16 JUN-9 PH 3:14 CLERK OF THE CoURT SUPERIOR-COURT GF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO STREETANDRESS: 40Q McAllister Street MAILING ADDRESS: cryanozecon:: San Francisco, CA 94102-4514 BRANGHNAME: LIMITED CIVIL PLAINTIFF: Corporation, dba CONTINENTAL COMMERCIAL GROUP; DEFENDANT: WALID AUMED MEFTAH, individually, dba GREEN VALLEY MARKE DEPUTY CLERK L.A. COMMERCIAL GROUP, INC., a 4, EX] -BY DEFAULT |. Defendant was properly served with @ capy of thé ‘summons and ‘complaint. 4 b. c d JUDGMENT [| By Clerk (3c) By Defaatt ("_] After Court Trial ! CadGie-8S0755 Lx) ‘By Court On Stipulation |__] -Defetidiiit Did Not : “— 1. CASE NUMBER: __ Appear at Trial JUDGMENT Defendant failed to answer the complaint of appear and deferid the action within the time allowed by tav. . Defendant's default was entered by the clerk upon plaintiff's application. Clerk's Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., §.585(a)). Defendant was sued only on'é contract or judgment-of a:court of this state for ihe recovery éf money. X | Court Judgment (Codé Civ. Proc, § $85(b)). Thecourt considered: mM plaintiff's testimony. and other evidence. (2) [2] plainiifi’s written declaration (Code Civ. Proc., § 685(d)). 2. ("} ON STIPULATION a. b. c. “Plaintiff and defendant-agreed (stipulated) that a judgment be‘entered in this case. The court approved the stipulated judgment arid ' fs ‘thé signed written stipulation wais fited in the case. T__] the stipulation was stated jn open court [1] -the.stiputation was stated on the record, 3, —_] AFTER COURT TRIAL, ‘The jury was-waived. ‘The court considerad the evidence. a b. a. The case was.tried on (dafe and time): before (name of judicial officer): Appearances by: {_] Plaintiff (name each): EJ] Piaintifrs:attorney (name. each): (ty ay @ (2) {"] Continued on Attachment 3b. [<1 betendant (name each): [1 Détendant's atiomey, (name each): w @ @ @) 1} Continued on Aitachment 3b. [=] Defendant did not-appear al trial, Defendant-was properly served with notice of trial, 1} A statement of decision (Code Civ. Proc.,-§-632) [7] was not’ [7 was; requested. Page Tohz Coda of Civil Procedure, $§ 565, 844.8 200-100 {Nez Januaity 1, 2002] Fam eee Oo - JUDGMENT ods . ta BhsPLAINTIFF: 5.A. COMMERCIAL GROUP, INC., dba CONTINENTAL COMMERCIAL GROUP; DEFENDANT: WALIO ARMED MEFTAH, individually, dba -GREEN VALLEY MARKET; “JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AS FOLLOWS. By: ‘X] THECOURT [__] THE CLERK. 4 C9 Stipulated Judgment. Judgment is entered according to the stipulation of the parties, 5. Parties; Judgmeritis a. LX) for.plaintiff (name éach): L.A. COMMERCIAT c [tor cross:complainant (naitie each}: GROUP, INC., a Corporation, dba CONTINENTAL COMMERCIAL GROUP; and against: defendant (names); WALID AHMED and. against cross-defendant (name-each): MEFTAH, individually, dba GREEN VALLEY MARKET; CASE NUMBER: CGci6-550755 a Corporation, C1 Continued on Attachment 5a. i] Continued on Attachment 5c. b. ["} for defendant (name eaci): 4. (J jor cross-defendant (name each): 6. “Amount. a. [X] Defendant named in item Sa.above must ve. [7] Cross-defendant named initem 5¢ atove musi pay pay: plaintiff on the-complaint: ‘créss-complainant on-the cross-complaint: Damages (i) [] Damages Prejidgment $ = (2) Prejudgment: interest at the P/G9. 23 interest at the | aonual rate of annual sate of Attomey fees. 450.00 @) Attorney. fees Costs 275.00 Costs. (5) CX) other (specify): $ 1,500.00 Other (specify: treble Damages Per COP §1719. TOTAL , b. [—] Plaintiff to receive nothing from defendant 2. [2 Cross-comptainant to receive nothing from Famed in item 5b: . ‘cross-defendant named in item 5d. Defendant named in item &b to recover [5 Cross-defendant named in item.5d to recover ists $ 0.00 costs $0.00 and attomey fees $ 0.00 arid attorney fees $0.00 7. ‘Other (specify): RSEPH M. QUINN Date: Tos £ Zol, Clie Date: ee) CLERK'S CERTIFICATE (Optional) {certify that this is a true copy-of the original judgment on file in the court. Date: Clerk, by - ; Deputy Page 20f2 JUD=108 (New January 7, 2002] auUDGMENT