Preview
ENLF-"D
SUPERIOR COCA”"" OF CA‘. IFORN‘A
MARCELO A. DIEGUEZ, ESQ, (SBN: 221951) COUNTY 3F SN“?- EKI' ‘APDRND
OMRI A. BEN—ARI, ESQ, (SBN: 291 5 17) SAN E11: (\ARi )NO '3! :r”iCY
YALDA SATAR, ESQ, (SBN: 304366)
DiEFER LAW GROUP, P.C. SE? 02 LUZZ
34204 Pacific Coast Highway
Dana Point,California 92629 BY Jammy“
xch~rfipv
0
u.
c
w r13:n.__,.__
p) zurp/
Telephone: (949) 260-9131 C, 1.,
‘... ,
Facsimile: (949) 691-3235
Email: litigation@dieferlaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LIZBETH MIRANDA
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
10
ll
LIZBETH MIRANDA, an individual, CASE NO.: CIVSB2207378
PLAINTIFF,
12
vs.
PROOF OF SERVICE
l3
l4
BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY
DIRECT CORPORATION dba Judge: Hon. Wilfred J Schneider, Jr.
BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY Dept: S32
15 Complaint Filed: 4/4/2022
WAREHOUSE, a New Jersey Corporation;
ROSIE GONZALES, an individual; and Trial Date: None Set
l6
DOES l through 25, inclusive VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
-'
l7 «
DEFENDANTS .
4
s
18 ‘m__u\
x
V;/4/\.\
l9 A,
A
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
///
28
DIEFER LAW
-1-
GROUP, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAw PROOF OF SERVICE
PROOF OF SERVICE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
I, Laura J. McCarty, I am employed in the County of San Diego, State of California. I am
over the age 0f 18 and not a patty to the within action. My business address is: 12636 High Bluff
Drive, Suite 400, San Diego, California 92130.
On September 2, 2022, I served the foregoing document(s) described as:
AMENDED REPLY DECLARATION OF OMRI A. BEN-ARI IN SUPPORT OF
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR
PRODUCTION, SET ONE, AND FOR SANCTIONS
concerning the case of Lizbeth Miranda v. Burlington Coat Factory, et a1. with case number
CIVSB2207378 in the Su erior Court of County 0f SAN BERNARDINO, on all interested parties
in this action by placing a true copy, El the original thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes
addressed as follows:
10
Sarah Syed, Esq.
ll Burlington
700 S. Flower St. Ste. 3 00 1
12 Los Angeles, CA 90017
Attorney for Defendant Burlington
l3
l4
D BY MAIL: As follows: I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection and
processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, it would be deposited with U.S. postal
service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Dana Point, California, in the ordinary
15
course of business. I am aware that on motion of the pany served, service is presumed invalid if
postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day afier date of deposit for mailing
l6
in affidavit.
l7 BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE: Pursuant to agreement of the panics or court order, I caused
a copy 0fthe above-listed document(s) to be sent fiom the email address of lmcca (d)dietbr¥aw.com
l8 to the person(s) with the e-mail address sarah.sved(ZI'JburhanLLCOIH, I did not receive, within a
reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message or other indication that the
l9 transmission was unsuccessfill.
20 E STATE:and
above is true
I declare under penalty of pteury under the laws of the State of California that the
correct.
21 D FEDERAL:
whose
I
direction the service
declare that I am employed
was made.
in the office of a member 0f the bar of this court at
22
Executed on September 2, 2022, in San Diego, California.
23
24
V ‘
Laura 9(1ch a
25
26
27
28
-2- Lizbeth Miranda Burlington
DIEFER LAW v‘ (1453)
Dgpt‘
GROUP, P.C. ,
ATTORNEYS AT LAW PROOF OF SERVICE
Preview
ENLF-"D SUPERIOR COCA”"" OF CA‘. IFORN‘A MARCELO A. DIEGUEZ, ESQ, (SBN: 221951) COUNTY 3F SN“?- EKI' ‘APDRND OMRI A. BEN—ARI, ESQ, (SBN: 291 5 17) SAN E11: (\ARi )NO '3! :r”iCY YALDA SATAR, ESQ, (SBN: 304366) DiEFER LAW GROUP, P.C. SE? 02 LUZZ 34204 Pacific Coast Highway Dana Point,California 92629 BY Jammy“ xch~rfipv 0 u. c w r13:n.__,.__ p) zurp/ Telephone: (949) 260-9131 C, 1., ‘... , Facsimile: (949) 691-3235 Email: litigation@dieferlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff LIZBETH MIRANDA SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 10 ll LIZBETH MIRANDA, an individual, CASE NO.: CIVSB2207378 PLAINTIFF, 12 vs. PROOF OF SERVICE l3 l4 BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY DIRECT CORPORATION dba Judge: Hon. Wilfred J Schneider, Jr. BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY Dept: S32 15 Complaint Filed: 4/4/2022 WAREHOUSE, a New Jersey Corporation; ROSIE GONZALES, an individual; and Trial Date: None Set l6 DOES l through 25, inclusive VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV -' l7 « DEFENDANTS . 4 s 18 ‘m__u\ x V;/4/\.\ l9 A, A 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 /// 28 DIEFER LAW -1- GROUP, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAw PROOF OF SERVICE PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO I, Laura J. McCarty, I am employed in the County of San Diego, State of California. I am over the age 0f 18 and not a patty to the within action. My business address is: 12636 High Bluff Drive, Suite 400, San Diego, California 92130. On September 2, 2022, I served the foregoing document(s) described as: AMENDED REPLY DECLARATION OF OMRI A. BEN-ARI IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION, SET ONE, AND FOR SANCTIONS concerning the case of Lizbeth Miranda v. Burlington Coat Factory, et a1. with case number CIVSB2207378 in the Su erior Court of County 0f SAN BERNARDINO, on all interested parties in this action by placing a true copy, El the original thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes addressed as follows: 10 Sarah Syed, Esq. ll Burlington 700 S. Flower St. Ste. 3 00 1 12 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Attorney for Defendant Burlington l3 l4 D BY MAIL: As follows: I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, it would be deposited with U.S. postal service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Dana Point, California, in the ordinary 15 course of business. I am aware that on motion of the pany served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day afier date of deposit for mailing l6 in affidavit. l7 BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE: Pursuant to agreement of the panics or court order, I caused a copy 0fthe above-listed document(s) to be sent fiom the email address of lmcca (d)dietbr¥aw.com l8 to the person(s) with the e-mail address sarah.sved(ZI'JburhanLLCOIH, I did not receive, within a reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message or other indication that the l9 transmission was unsuccessfill. 20 E STATE:and above is true I declare under penalty of pteury under the laws of the State of California that the correct. 21 D FEDERAL: whose I direction the service declare that I am employed was made. in the office of a member 0f the bar of this court at 22 Executed on September 2, 2022, in San Diego, California. 23 24 V ‘ Laura 9(1ch a 25 26 27 28 -2- Lizbeth Miranda Burlington DIEFER LAW v‘ (1453) Dgpt‘ GROUP, P.C. , ATTORNEYS AT LAW PROOF OF SERVICE