arrow left
arrow right
  • Katz, Manka, Teplinsky, Graves & Sobol LTD vs Roger A. Strand Contract document preview
  • Katz, Manka, Teplinsky, Graves & Sobol LTD vs Roger A. Strand Contract document preview
						
                                

Preview

FEB/18/2015/WED 15:14 FAY Wo, 320 598 3915 P. 001/00! STATE OF MINNESOTA | _ IN DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF CHIPPEWA cos EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ‘Const File: 12-CV-13-700 Katz, , Graves & Sobol LTD, ORDER Plaintiff, DEFENDANT’S REQUEST TO v ‘FILE A MOTION TO RECONSIDER Roger A. Strand, } Defendant. The sbove-ttted mater came before the Honorsble Thomas W. Van Hon pursuant t Defendant's requect under Minnesota Rule of General Practive 115.11 to file a motion for the court to recénsider the decision to grant summary judgment dismissing Defendant's counterclaim. The Court heard the arguments of the Defendant on the insue of applicability of the statute of limitations. Teo Const condone then exgitnests. Based upon all the files and proceedings bereia, the court denies the request of the defendant to file a motion to reconsider. ° . : r Dated this 18th day of February, 2015. ° ; 7 2 _.. ‘Thomas W. ‘Van Hon é Judge of District Court Cela coy FEB 18 2u15 ECKHARDT