arrow left
arrow right
  • ALVARO ELVIR RODRIGUEZ VS. JAKE WEIR ET AL PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • ALVARO ELVIR RODRIGUEZ VS. JAKE WEIR ET AL PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • ALVARO ELVIR RODRIGUEZ VS. JAKE WEIR ET AL PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • ALVARO ELVIR RODRIGUEZ VS. JAKE WEIR ET AL PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • ALVARO ELVIR RODRIGUEZ VS. JAKE WEIR ET AL PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • ALVARO ELVIR RODRIGUEZ VS. JAKE WEIR ET AL PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • ALVARO ELVIR RODRIGUEZ VS. JAKE WEIR ET AL PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • ALVARO ELVIR RODRIGUEZ VS. JAKE WEIR ET AL PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - VEHICLE RELATED document preview
						
                                

Preview

CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, Stale Gar number, and address). FOR COURT USE ONLY Kevin J. Gray, SBN: 142685 Jin Im, SBN: 266810 Harrington, Foxx, Dubrow & Canter, LLP 601 Montgomery Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94111 ‘TELEPHONE No. 415-288-6600 FAX NO. (Optionay: 415-288-6618 EE eee EMAIL ADDRESS (Ostiona FILED ATTORNEY FOR (Name). De fendan Superior Court of California, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF San Francisco County of San Francisco streer aporess: 400 McAllister Street 05/25/2017 MAILING ADDRESS: Clerk of the Court ciryanozpcone: San Francisco, CA BY:KENNETH HUNT BRANCH NAME: Deputy Clerk PLAINTIFF/PETITIONERALVARO ELVIR RODRIGUEZ DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:JAKE WEIR, BETTY WEIR, SCOTT WEIR CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Sasriarers (Check one): X UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE CGC-17-556326 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: June 14, 2017 Time:10:30 a.m. Dept: 610 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): X. Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Jin Im INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. _X_ This statementis submitted by party (name):Defendants Jake Weir, Betty Weir, Scott Weir b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): b. The cross-compiaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of casein %_ complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): personal injury, motor vehicle accident. Pago 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Gal, Rules of Cour, “usical Goune! of Catfomie CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT [egal rules 3.720-8.730 OM-110 (Rev. July 1, 2011] Solutign:CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: ALVARO ELVIR RODRIGUEZ ‘CASE NUMBER: DEFENDANTRESPONDENT: JAKE WEIR, BETTY WEIR, SCOTT werR — | CSC-17-556326 4. b. Provide a brief statement of the case, including any damages. (If personal injury damages are sought, specify the injury and damages claimed, including medical expenses to date [indicate source and amount], estimated future medical expenses, Jost earnings to date, and estimated future lost earnings. If equitable relief is sought, describe the nature of the relief.) Plaintiff alleges he sustained injuries due to a motor vehicle accident on or about January 24, 2015 in San Francisco, CA, (If more space is needed, check this box and attach a page designated as Attachment 4b.) 5. Jury or nonjury trial The party or parties request x _ ajury trial @ nonjury trial. (if more than one party, provide the name of each party requesting a jury trial): 6. Trial date a. The trial has been set for (date): b. x. No trial date has been set. This case will be ready for trial within 12 months of the date of the filing of the complaint (if not, explain): c. Dates on which parties or attorneys will not be available for trial (specify dates and explain reasons for unavailability): 7. Estimated length of trial The party or parties estimate that the trial will take (check one): a. |X. days (specify number): 5-7 b. hours (short causes) (specify): 8. Trial representation (to be answered for each party) The party or parties will be represented at trial X_ by the attorney or party listed in the caption by the following: a. Attorney: b. Firm: c. Address: d. Telephone number: f. Fax number: e. E-mail address: g. Party represented: Additional representation is described in Attachment 8. 9. Preference This case is entitled to preference (specify code section): 10. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) a. ADR information package. Please note that different ADR processes are available in different courts and communities; read the ADR information package provided by the court under rule 3.221 for information about the processes available through the court and community programs in this case. (1) For parties represented by counsel: Counsel _x has has not provided the ADR information package identified in rule 3.221 to the client and reviewed ADR options with the client. (2) For self-represented parties: Party has has not reviewed the ADR information package identified in rule 3.221. b. Referral to judicial arbitration or civil action mediation (if available). (1) This matter is subject to mandatory judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.11 or to civil action mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775.3 because the amount in controversy does not exceed the statutory limit. (2) Plaintiff elects to refer this case to judicial arbitration and agrees to limit recovery to the amount specified in Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.11. (3) This case is exempt from judicial arbitration under rule 3.811 of the California Rules of Court or from civil action mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775 et sea. (specify exemption): EM-110 Rev. July 1, 20717 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page2 ofSPLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: ALVARO ELVIR RODRIGUEZ CASE NUMBER PEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: JAKE WEIR, BETTY WEIR, SCOTT WEIR CGE-17=556326 CM-110 10, c. Indicate the ADR process or processes that the party or parties are willing to participate in, have agreed to participate in, or have already participated in (check all that apply and provide the specified information): The party or parties completing this form are willing to participate in the following ADR processes (check all that apply): | stipulation): if the party or parties completing this form in the case have agreed to participate in or have already completed an ADR process or processes, indicate the status of the processes (attach a copy of the parties’ ADR x_ Mediation session not yet scheduled Mediation session scheduled for (date): (1) Mediation x Agreed to complete mediation by (date): Mediation completed on (date): x_ Settlement conference not yet scheduled (2) Settlement Settlement conference scheduled for (date): conference * Agreed to complete settlement conference by (date): Settlement conference completed on (date): (3) Neutral evaluation Neutral evaluation not yet scheduled Neutral evaluation scheduled for (date): Agreed to complete neutral evaluation by (date): Neutral evaluation completed on (date): (4) Nonbinding judicial arbitration Judicial arbitration not yet scheduled Judicial arbitration scheduled for (date): Agreed to complete judicial arbitration by (date): Judicial arbitration completed on (date): (5) Binding private arbitration (6) Other (specify): Private arbitration not yet scheduled Private arbitration scheduled for (date): Agreed to complete private arbitration by (date): Private arbitration completed on (date): ADR session not yet scheduled ADR session scheduled for (date): Agreed to complete ADR session by (date): ADR completed on (date): CHAA10 (Rev. July 7, 2071] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page ateCM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: ALVARO ELVIR RODRIGUEZ CASE NUMBER: | DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: JAKE WEIR, BETTY WEIR, SCOTT WEIR CGC-17-556326 11. Insurance a. xX. Insurance carrier, if any, for party filing this statement (name): IDS Property Casualty Ins. Co. b. Reservation of rights: Yes x No c. Coverage issues will significantly affect resolution of this case (explain): 12. Jurisdiction Indicate any matters that may affect the court's jurisdiction or processing of this case and describe the status. Bankruptcy Other (specify): Status: 13. Related cases, consolidation, and coordination a. There are companion, underlying, or related cases. (1) Name of case: (2) Name of court: (3) Case number: (4) Status: Additional cases are described in Attachment 13a. b. Amotion to consolidate coordinate will be filed by (name party): 14. Bifurcation The party or parties intend to file a motion for an order bifurcating, severing, or coordinating the following issues or causes of action (specify moving party, type of motion, and reasons): 15. Other motions The party or parties expect to file the following motions before trial (specify moving party, type of motion, and issues): 16. Discovery a. The party or parties have completed all discovery. b. x. The following discovery will be completed by the date specified (describe all anticipated discovery): Party Description Date Defendants Written Discovery 8/2017 Defendants Depositions 9/2017 Defendants Expert discovery Per Code c. _x The following discovery issues, including issues regarding the discovery of electronically stored information, are anticipated (specify): aes eae CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 4:98CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: ALVARO ELVIR RODRIGUEZ CASE NUMBER: | DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: JAKE WEIR, BETTY WEIR, SCOTT WEIR CGC-17-556326 17. Economic litigation a. This is a limited civil case (i.e, the amount demanded is $25,000 or less) and the economic litigation procedures in Code of Civil Procedure sections 90-98 will apply to this case. b. This is a limited civil case and a motion to withdraw the case from the economic litigation procedures or for additional discovery will be filed (if checked, explain specifically why economic litigation procedures relating to discovery or trial should not apply to this case): 18. Other issues The party or parties request that the following additional matters be considered or determined at the case management conference (specify): 19. Meet and confer a. The party or parties have met and conferred with all parties on all subjects required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court (if not, explain): b. After meeting and conferring as required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court, the parties agree.on the following (specify): 20. Total number of pages attached (if any): | am completely familiar with this case and will be fully prepared to discuss the status of discovery and altemative dispute resolution, as well as other issues raised by this statement, and will possess the authority to enter into stipulations on these issues at the time of the case management conference, including the written authority of the party where required. Ht Date: May ™ 2017, Jin Im » eae eee TYPE OR PRINT HAE) as ‘OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) Additional signatures are attached. EMO Re day 3 2071 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page otePROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Iam employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is 601 Montgomery Street, Suite 800, San Francisco, California 94111. On May 25, 2017 I served the foregoing document described as CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT on all interested parties in this action by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes addressed as stated on the attached service list: [X] BY MAIL - I deposited such envelope in the mail at San Francisco, California. The envelope was mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid. I am “readily familiar” with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at San Francisco, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one (1) day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. BY PERSONAL SERVICE - I caused such envelope to be delivered by a process server employed by ProLegal Attorney Services. VIA FACSIMILE- I faxed said document, to the office(s) of the addressee(s) shown above, and the transmission was reported as complete and without error. BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION - I transmitted a PDF version of this document by electronic mail to the party(s) identified on the attached service list using the e-mail address(es) indicated. BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY - | deposited such envelope for collection and delivery by Federal Express with delivery fees paid or provided for in accordance with ordinary business practices. I am “readily familiar” with the firm’s practice of collection and processing packages for overnight delivery by Federal Express. They are deposited with a facility regularly maintained by Federal Express for receipt on the same day in the ordinary course of business. (State) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. (Federal) I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made. Executed on May 25, 2017, at San Francisco, California.Robyn Rodriguez v Mark Steven Dean, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive SERVICE LIST Santa Clara County Superior Court Case No.: 16CV303754 Roger Hecht, Esq. FARLING, HECHT & DAVIS 96 N. Third Street, Suite 660 San Jose, CA 95112 Phone: (408) 295-6100 Fax: (408) 299-0396 E\casesf\aahi.5 1 96\pos\master proof of service.docx 2 PROOF OF SERVICE