On January 06, 2017 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Ding, Zhongying,
and
City And County Of San Francisco,
Does 1 Through 100,
The City And County Of San Francisco,
The Palace Of Fine Arts,
for civil
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
BISH LAW
22505 Market St, Ste 104
CA 91321
Newhall,
IYINDY Bish SBK 169/43
iM othy KUAS TIL BY Groby
Bish Lhn, (PE
Z28ol Mt ker TK Sere s04- FILED
NEWHALL, CA G1321- 29385 MAY 76 2o19
Tile + (Gb)) 6 - $300 o ERR PF THR C
CRY | 661) 2S 8 30) Déplity Clerk’
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
ZHONGYING DING, Case No.: CGC-17-556300
Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTION TO Q
v. SUBPOENA [P
ITHE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN Pate: May 16,201 9
FRANCISCO; and DOES 1 TO 100, Place: 400 McAllister St
Inclusive, San Francisco, CA 94102
Dept. 302
Defendants.
The matter came regularly for hearing on May 16, 2019 in Department 302, Timothy R.
Vrastil appearing for Plaintiff and James F. Hannawalt appearing for Defendant. After reviewing
the Moving Papers, Opposition and Reply Briefs, the Court rules as follows:
Defendant City and County of San Francisco's motion to quash trial subpoena of
Jeffrey Bramlett is denied. The City's counsel previously agreed to accept service of the subpoena
on behalf of Mr. Bramlett, who is a material witness who signed the City's written discovery
responses and a declaration in support of the City's motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff
Zhongying Ding is not seeking to reopen discovery or to depose Mr. Bramlett. The City can
readily resolve Mr. Bramlett's schedule conflict with the current trial date by accepting Plaintiff's
offer to stipulate to a brief continuance of the trial until Mr. Bramlett returns from vacation.
IT IS SO ORDERED
Dated: May 16, 2019 Play? _—
on. Ethan'P. Schulman
ORDER ON MOTION TO OUASH SUBPOENA
Document Filed Date
May 16, 2019
Case Filing Date
January 06, 2017
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
BISH LAW 22505 Market St, Ste 104 CA 91321 Newhall, IYINDY Bish SBK 169/43 iM othy KUAS TIL BY Groby Bish Lhn, (PE Z28ol Mt ker TK Sere s04- FILED NEWHALL, CA G1321- 29385 MAY 76 2o19 Tile + (Gb)) 6 - $300 o ERR PF THR C CRY | 661) 2S 8 30) Déplity Clerk’ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ZHONGYING DING, Case No.: CGC-17-556300 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTION TO Q v. SUBPOENA [P ITHE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN Pate: May 16,201 9 FRANCISCO; and DOES 1 TO 100, Place: 400 McAllister St Inclusive, San Francisco, CA 94102 Dept. 302 Defendants. The matter came regularly for hearing on May 16, 2019 in Department 302, Timothy R. Vrastil appearing for Plaintiff and James F. Hannawalt appearing for Defendant. After reviewing the Moving Papers, Opposition and Reply Briefs, the Court rules as follows: Defendant City and County of San Francisco's motion to quash trial subpoena of Jeffrey Bramlett is denied. The City's counsel previously agreed to accept service of the subpoena on behalf of Mr. Bramlett, who is a material witness who signed the City's written discovery responses and a declaration in support of the City's motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff Zhongying Ding is not seeking to reopen discovery or to depose Mr. Bramlett. The City can readily resolve Mr. Bramlett's schedule conflict with the current trial date by accepting Plaintiff's offer to stipulate to a brief continuance of the trial until Mr. Bramlett returns from vacation. IT IS SO ORDERED Dated: May 16, 2019 Play? _— on. Ethan'P. Schulman ORDER ON MOTION TO OUASH SUBPOENA