Plaintiff's Response to APTVC, LLC's Motion to Compel

On November 8, 2016 a personal inj (non-auto) case was filed by Claiborne, Angela, represented by Wexler, Noah M., and Wexler, Noah Michael, against Amg Woodfair Llc, Aptvc Llc, Claiborne, Akeisha et al. represented by Gibson, Robert Gaines Jr., and Sanders, Thomas C., in the jurisdiction of Harris County. Judge BEAU MILLER presiding.

                        
Preview
Angela Claiborne IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff Vv. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS APTVC, LLC Defendant 190 JUDICIAL DISTRICT Plaintiff’s Response to APTVC, LLC’s Motion to Compel Defendant APTVC, LLC’s (““APTVC”) Motion to Compel should be denied because: Plaintiff timely responded that she does not have any responsive documents to APTVC’s Third Set of Requests for Production. Because APTVC has Plaintiff's medical record authorization, the documents sought in APTVC’s ion are equally available to Defendants. The documents requested in APTVC’s Fourth Set of Requests for P are inadmissible and irrelevant under the collateral source rule. For these reasons, APTVC’s motion should be denied. …

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope