On February 17, 2017 a
Order to Show Cause
was filed
involving a dispute between
Fishman, Gregory,
and
Cambridge Staffing Solutions, Llc.,,
Does 1 Through 50, Inclusive,
Kiritchenko, Lidia,
Sino, Alex,
for civil
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
om IN A HW F&F WN
WILLIAM C. LAST, JR. (SBN 83588)
PATRICK J. WHITEHORN (SBN 225927)
LAST & FAORO
520 South El Camino Real, Suite 430 ELECTRONICALLY:
San Mateo, California 94402
Telephone: (650) 696-8350 FILED
Facsimile: (650) 696-8365 Superior Court of California,
County of San Francisco
03/19/2018
Attomeys for Gregory Fishman. OE nec
Deputy Clerk
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
IN AND FOR SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
GREGORY FISHMAN Case No.: CGC-17-557162
ties NOTICE OF CONTINUED ORDER TO
Plaintiff, SHOW CAUSE
ve Date: May 8, 2018
Time: 10:30 a.m.
CAMBRIDGE STAFFING SOLUTIONS, LLC. a] pene: 610
California limited liability company; ALEX SINO,
an Individual and manager of Cambridge Staffing
Solutions, LLC; LIDIA KIRITCHENKO, an
Individual and manager of Cambridge Staffing
Solutions, LLC; and DOES 1 through 50,
inclusive,
Defendants.
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of San Francisco Superior Court’s CONTINUED ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE: to obtain an answer(s) from, or enter default(s) as to First Amended Complaint.
A true and correct copy of the order is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Dated: March 19, 2018
LAST & FAORO,
illiam C. Last
Patrick J. Whitehorn
Attorneys for Gregory Fishman
NOTICE OF CONTINUED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSEEXHIBIT ASUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA ox,
My Ve
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO “Ap SD
400 MCALLISTER STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CA941 02-48%, g Op
io
Lay
GREGORY FISHMAN Case Management Department 640
Case Management Order
PLAINTIFF (S)
vs. NO. CGG-17-857162
CAMBRIDGE STAFFING SOLUTIONS, LLC., et
a Continued Order to Show Cause
DEFENDANT (S)
TO: PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL AND/OR SELF-REPRESENTED PLAINTIFF(S)
The Mar-20-2018 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE is canceled.
YOU ARE HEREBY ORDERED TO APPEAR in Department 610 on May-08-2018 at 10:30 am, pursuant
to Local Rule 3.0 C to show cause why this action should not be dismissed or why sanctions should not
be imposed for failure to:
obtain an answer(s) from, or enter default(s) against, defendant(s) as to First Amended Complaint.
CRC 3.110(i) requires that responsive papers to an order to show cause must be filed and served at least
5 calendar days before the hearing.
However, it would facilitate the issuance of a case management order prior to the Order to Show Cause
hearing if the Response to Order to Show Cause is filed, served and lodged in Department 610 twenty
(20) days before the Order to Show Cause hearing.
PLAINTIFF(S) must serve a copy of this notice on all parties not listed on the attached proof of service
within five (5} days of the date of this order.
You may call (415) 551-4000 after 12:00 noon the day before the hearing to determine whether your
compliance has taken the order to show cause off calendar.
DATED: MAR-15-2018 TERI L. JACKSON
JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
Continued Order to Show Cause
Form 000001PROOF OF SERVICE
I, the undersigned, declare that | am employed in the City and County of San Mateo,
California. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within action. My business address
is 520 S. El Camino Real, Ste 430, San Mateo, California 94402,
On the indicated below, I served the within document(s), entitled:
NOTICE OF CONTINUED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
on each party(ies) addressed as follows:
Stephen H. Dye
Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis, LLP
650 California Street, 19th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108-2736
Fax: 415-364-6785
Email: sdye@schnader.com
[X] BY MAIL: by placing a true copy of each document listed above in a sealed envelope
addressed to the parties listed above and depositing it with the U.S. Postal Service on the date
shown below.
Oo BY E-MAIL: I caused a true copy to be transmitted via e-mail to the addressee(s) listed above
at the e-mail noted after the party’s address.
0 BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY: by delivering each document to an authorized courier
authorized by the express service carrier to receive documents in an envelope designated by
the express service carrier with delivery fees prepaid or provided for and addressed as above-
shown.
oO BY FACSIMILE: I caused a true copy to be transmitted via facsimile to the addressee(s)
listed above at the Fax number noted after the party’s address.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing
is true and correct.
Executed on March 19, 2018.
[Nun Cpr
Lynne Casanova
Proof of Service
Document Filed Date
March 19, 2018
Case Filing Date
February 17, 2017
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.