On February 23, 2018 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Mason, Dawn Ann,
Mason, James,
and
Does 1 Through 10, Inclusive,
Fca Us, Llc,
for CONTRACT/WARRANTY
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
JON D. UNIVERSAL, SBN 141255
JAMES P. MAYO, SBN 169897
NEJLA NASSIRIAN, SBN 308730
ADAM G. KHAN, SBN 296617 L E
BRETT H. WANNER, SBN 314025 jor Court
BOBBY C. WALKER, SBN 321788 San Francleco County Sup!
UNIVERSAL & SHANNON, LLP +05 2019
2240 Douglas Boulevard, Suite 290 JUN 05 2
Roseville, California 95661 :
Telephone: (016) 780-4050 CLERIV9Y THE COURT
Facsimile: (916) 780-9070 BY: ly Oak
Attorneys for Defendant FCA US LLC
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
DAWN ANN MASON and JAMES MASON, __| Case No.: CGC-18-564545
Plaintiffs, Action Filed: February 23, 2018
Trial Date: November 12, 2019
ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO
COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH THE
vs.
FCA US LLC; and DOES 1 through 10, COURT’S FEBRUARY 4, 2019
,
inclusive, DISCOVERY ORDER AND FOR
PROSPECTIVE SANCTIONS OF $500
Defendants. PER DAY
Hearing Date: May 30, 2019
Hearing Time: 9:00 a.m.
Hearing Location: 302
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Compliance with the Court’s February 4, 2019 Discovery
Order and Request for Prospective Sanctions of $500 Per Day (the “Motion”) initially came’on for
hearing on May 13, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. in the above entitled court.
On May 10, 2019 the Court issued a tentative ruling granting Plaintiff's Motion but
reserving the issue of sanctions until May 30, 2019. Neither party contested the ruling or requested
oral argument. The Court adopted it’s tentative ruling, ordered the parties to submit a brief
providing a status update on the compliance no later than May 27, 2019 and a further hearing on
compliance and sanctions for May 30, 2019 at 9:00 a.m.
Mf
1
ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH THE COURT’S FEBRUARY 4, 2019
DISCOVERY ORDER AND FOR PROSPECTIVE SANCTIONS OF $500 PER DAYOn May 30, 2019, at 9:00 a.m in the above entitled court, Plaintiffs’ Motion was again on
for hearing on the issue of compliance and sanctions.
Caitlin Scott of STRATEGIC LEGAL PRACTICES, APC on behalf of Plaintiff. Nejla
Nassirian of UNIVERSAL & SHANNON, LLP appeared on behalf of Defendant.
Having read Plaintiffs’ Motion and Defendant’s opposition, including all memoranda and
declarations filed by both parties, and having considered the oral arguments of counsel, the Court
hereby orders that:
Plaintiff's request for sanctions is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 30, 2019
Noah D. Lebowitz
fudge Pro-Fenro! uperior Court
County of San Francisco
2
ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH THE COURT’S FEBRUARY 4, 2019
DISCOVERY ORDER AND FOR PROSPECTIVE SANCTIONS OF $500 PER DAY
Document Filed Date
June 05, 2019
Case Filing Date
February 23, 2018
Category
CONTRACT/WARRANTY
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
JON D. UNIVERSAL, SBN 141255 JAMES P. MAYO, SBN 169897 NEJLA NASSIRIAN, SBN 308730 ADAM G. KHAN, SBN 296617 L E BRETT H. WANNER, SBN 314025 jor Court BOBBY C. WALKER, SBN 321788 San Francleco County Sup! UNIVERSAL & SHANNON, LLP +05 2019 2240 Douglas Boulevard, Suite 290 JUN 05 2 Roseville, California 95661 : Telephone: (016) 780-4050 CLERIV9Y THE COURT Facsimile: (916) 780-9070 BY: ly Oak Attorneys for Defendant FCA US LLC SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO DAWN ANN MASON and JAMES MASON, __| Case No.: CGC-18-564545 Plaintiffs, Action Filed: February 23, 2018 Trial Date: November 12, 2019 ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH THE vs. FCA US LLC; and DOES 1 through 10, COURT’S FEBRUARY 4, 2019 , inclusive, DISCOVERY ORDER AND FOR PROSPECTIVE SANCTIONS OF $500 Defendants. PER DAY Hearing Date: May 30, 2019 Hearing Time: 9:00 a.m. Hearing Location: 302 Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Compliance with the Court’s February 4, 2019 Discovery Order and Request for Prospective Sanctions of $500 Per Day (the “Motion”) initially came’on for hearing on May 13, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. in the above entitled court. On May 10, 2019 the Court issued a tentative ruling granting Plaintiff's Motion but reserving the issue of sanctions until May 30, 2019. Neither party contested the ruling or requested oral argument. The Court adopted it’s tentative ruling, ordered the parties to submit a brief providing a status update on the compliance no later than May 27, 2019 and a further hearing on compliance and sanctions for May 30, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. Mf 1 ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH THE COURT’S FEBRUARY 4, 2019 DISCOVERY ORDER AND FOR PROSPECTIVE SANCTIONS OF $500 PER DAYOn May 30, 2019, at 9:00 a.m in the above entitled court, Plaintiffs’ Motion was again on for hearing on the issue of compliance and sanctions. Caitlin Scott of STRATEGIC LEGAL PRACTICES, APC on behalf of Plaintiff. Nejla Nassirian of UNIVERSAL & SHANNON, LLP appeared on behalf of Defendant. Having read Plaintiffs’ Motion and Defendant’s opposition, including all memoranda and declarations filed by both parties, and having considered the oral arguments of counsel, the Court hereby orders that: Plaintiff's request for sanctions is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 30, 2019 Noah D. Lebowitz fudge Pro-Fenro! uperior Court County of San Francisco 2 ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH THE COURT’S FEBRUARY 4, 2019 DISCOVERY ORDER AND FOR PROSPECTIVE SANCTIONS OF $500 PER DAY