On July 30, 2019 a
Proof of Service
was filed
involving a dispute between
Herrera, Margarita,
and
City And County Of San Francisco,
Does 1 Through 15,
for OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
1 DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669
City Attorney
2 KATHARINE HOBIN PORTER, State Bar #173180 ELECTRONICALLY
Chief Labor Attorney FILED
3 Erin Kuka, State Bar #275042 Superior Court of California,
County of San Francisco
Deputy City Attorney
4 Fox Plaza 06/17/2020
1390 Market Street, Floor Five Clerk of the Court
BY: RONNIE OTERO
5 San Francisco, California 94102-5408 Deputy Clerk
Telephone: (415) 554-4229
6 Facsimile: (415) 554-4248
E-Mail: erin.kuka@sfcityatty.org
7
8 Attorneys for Defendant
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
9
10 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
11 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
12 UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
13 MARGARITA HERRERA, Case No. CGC-19-578026
14 Plaintiff, PROOF OF SERVICE
15 vs. Date Action Filed: July 30, 2019
Trial Date: January 25, 2021
16 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO,
17
Defendant.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
PROOF OF SERVICE; CASE NO. CGC-19-578026 n:\labor\li2019\200243\01396203.docx
PROOF OF SERVICE
1
2 I, SYLVIA ANGELO, declare as follows:
3 I am a citizen of the United States, over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the above-
4 entitled action. I am employed at the City Attorney’s Office of San Francisco, Fox Plaza Building,
5 1390 Market Street, Fifth Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102.
6 On June 17, 2020, I served the following documents:
7 • MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S
8 MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST SET OF
REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, FIRST SET OF REQUESTS
9 FOR ADMISSION AND FORM INTERROGATORIES – EMPLOYMENT (SET ONE)
AND FOR AN AWARD OF A MONETARY SANCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT IN
10 THE AMOUNT OF $2,597.50
• DECLARATION OF ERIN KUKA IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT CITY AND
11 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO
COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS
12 FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR
ADMISSION AND FORM INTERROGATORIES - EMPLOYMENT (SET ONE) AND
13 FOR AN AWARD OF A MONETARY SANCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT IN THE
AMOUNT OF $2,597.50
14
• DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO’S RESPONSE TO
15 PLAINTIFF’S SEPARATE STATEMENT RE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S FORM
INTERROGATORIES – EMPLOYMENT LAW, SET NO. ONE AND FOR AN
16 AWARD OF A MONETARY SANCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT IN THE AMOUNT
OF $2,597.50
17
• DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO’S RESPONSE TO
18 PLAINTIFF’S SEPARATE STATEMENT RE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS, SET NO. ONE AND FOR AN AWARD OF A
19 MONETARY SANCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,597.50
• DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO’S RESPONSE TO
20 PLAINTIFF’S SEPARATE STATEMENT RE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET NO. ONE AND FOR AN
21 AWARD OF A MONETARY SANCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT IN THE AMOUNT
OF $2,597.50
22
on the following persons at the locations specified:
23 Deborah Kochan Attorneys for Plaintiff
Mathew Stephenson
24 KOCHAN & STEPHENSON
1680 Shattuck Avenue
25 Berkeley, CA 94709
26 Email: dkochan@kochanstephenson.net
Email: mstephenson@kochanstephenson.net
27
28
2
PROOF OF SERVICE; CASE NO. CGC-19-578026 n:\labor\li2019\200243\01396203.docx
in the manner indicated below:
1
BY UNITED STATES MAIL: Following ordinary business practices, I sealed true and correct copies of
2 the above documents in addressed envelope(s) and placed them at my workplace for collection and mailing with
the United States Postal Service. I am readily familiar with the practices of the San Francisco City Attorney's
3 Office for collecting and processing mail. In the ordinary course of business, the sealed envelope(s) that I placed
for collection would be deposited, postage prepaid, with the United States Postal Service that same day.
4
BY PERSONAL SERVICE: I sealed true and correct copies of the above documents in addressed
5 envelope(s) and caused such envelope(s) to be delivered by hand at the above locations by a professional
messenger service. A declaration from the messenger who made the delivery is attached or will be
6 filed separately with the court.
7 BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY: I sealed true and correct copies of the above documents in addressed
envelope(s) and placed them at my workplace for collection and delivery by overnight courier service. I am
8 readily familiar with the practices of the San Francisco City Attorney's Office for sending overnight deliveries. In
the ordinary course of business, the sealed envelope(s) that I placed for collection would be collected by a courier
9 the same day.
10 BY ELECTRONIC MAIL: Based on a court order or an agreement of the parties to accept electronic
service, I caused the documents to be sent to the person(s) at the electronic service address(es) listed above. Such
11 document(s) were transmitted via electronic mail from the electronic address: sylvia.angelo@sfcityatty.org in
portable document format ("PDF") Adobe Acrobat or in Word document format.
12
BY ELECTRONIC MAIL: Based on a court order or an agreement of the parties to accept electronic
13 service, I caused the documents to be served electronically through File & ServeXpress in portable document
format ("PDF") Adobe Acrobat.
14
15 I declare under penalty of perjury pursuant to the laws of the State of California that the
16 foregoing is true and correct.
17 Executed June 17, 2020, at San Francisco, California.
18
19
SYLVIA ANGELO
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
PROOF OF SERVICE; CASE NO. CGC-19-578026 n:\labor\li2019\200243\01396203.docx
Document Filed Date
June 17, 2020
Case Filing Date
July 30, 2019
Category
OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.