arrow left
arrow right
  • In Re the Matter of: DeAndre Antonio McKenzie vs. Philexia Davis Custody document preview
  • In Re the Matter of: DeAndre Antonio McKenzie vs. Philexia Davis Custody document preview
  • In Re the Matter of: DeAndre Antonio McKenzie vs. Philexia Davis Custody document preview
  • In Re the Matter of: DeAndre Antonio McKenzie vs. Philexia Davis Custody document preview
						
                                

Preview

27-FA-16-7554 Filed in Fourth Judicial District Court 8/8/2018 4:24 PM Hennepin County, MN ' STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT In Re the Matter of: Court File No‘ 27—FA-16—7554 De’Andre Antonio McKenzie, Petitioner, ORDER DENYING MOTION and Philexia D. Davis, Respondent. This matter came administratively before the Court on August 8, 2018. Based on the record, together with the arguments of the parties, the Court makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The parties are the parents oan’layha Ora Marie McKenzie, born December 3 1, 2015. 2. Pursuant to an Order (“J&D”) entered February 15, 2017, the parties have joint legal and joint physical custody of Aa’llayha. The J&D granted Ms. Davis the right to claim the dependency exemption for Aa’layha until Mr. McKenzie either became employed or started paying child—support. 3. On August 7, 2018, Mr. McKenzie filed a motion requesting he be allowed t0 claim the dependency exemption every other year. The motion is frivolous and must be denied for at least two reasons. 27-FA-16-7554 Filed in Fourth Judicial District Court 8/8/2018 4:24 PM Hennepin County, MN 4. First, the J&D clearly states that Mr. McKenzie may request that the Court reconsider the allocation 0f the dependency exemption if he becomes employed 0r begins paying child support. He has not paid child support since the J&D. He does not allege that he is now employed. If he is, the parties Will retum t0 Court and he will be ordered to pay child support. 5. Second, the federal tax law has eliminated the dependency exemption, making this issue moot. If the dependency exemption is reinstated in the future, Mr. McKenzie can raise the issue then, provided he is either employed or paying child support. ORDER 1. Mr. McKenzie’s motion is DENIED; and 2. The September 21, 2018 hearing on Mr. McKenzie’s motion is CANCELLED. August 8, 2018 ’M'j/deflfl/w Thomas S. Fraser f Judge of District Court