On May 03, 2021 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Vora, Ved,
and
Twitter, Inc.,
for OTHER CIVIL PETITIONS
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
a
“
I
o
Zz
ww
w
°
7
ee
uw
°
a
wi
a
Zz
w
zZ
°
C7
x
150 Post Street, Suite 520 San Francisco, CA 94108
onnrt oa nr Wn
yDNNNMYRHN NNN ESA ezeAetaanaoigs
RBNS&ask & Ss 3 56 Oo DOD N ODO FON = DO
KRONENBERGER ROSENFELD, LLP
Karl S. Kronenberger (Bar No. 226112)
Jeffrey M. Rosenfeld (Bar No. 222187)
Ruben Pefia (CA Bar No. 328106)
150 Post Street, Suite 520
San Francisco, CA 94108
Telephone: (415) 955-1155
Facsimile: (415) 955-1158
karl@KRinternetLaw.com
jeff@KRinternetLaw.com
ruben@KRinternetLaw.com
Attorneys for Petitioner Ved Vora
San Francisco County Superior ‘Court
JUN 0 9 2024
CER Be THE COURT UU
BY: Say lerk
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
VED VORA, an individual,
Petitioner,
v.
TWITTER, INC.,
Respondent.
VED VORA,
Plaintiff,
Vv.
JOHN DOE 1 and
JOHN DOES 2-10,
Defendants.
Case No. CPF-21-517434
Case No. CPF-21-517434
|
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER VED
VORA’S PETITION TO COMPEL
TWITTER, INC. TO RESPOND TO
SUBPOENA ISSUED FOR CASE
PENDING IN FOREIGN JURISDICTION
PURSUANT TO C.C.P. §2029.600
Wh
-{PRGP.] ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S
PETITION TO COMPEL TWITTERon nt OD aA F&F WN =
aA sa a a ew a en
Nn DO a FB Ww NH + OG
150 Post Slroct, Suita §20 San Francisco, CA 94108
=
@
KRONENBERGER ROSENFELD
=
o
No NY NY NY NH NY NY NN NY
on oak © DH = CO
This matter came on for hearing on June 4, 2021 on Petitioner Ved Vora’s Petition
to Compel Twitter, Inc. (“Twitter”) to Respond to Subpoena Issued for Case Pending in
Foreign Jurisdiction Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure (“CCP”) §2029.600 (the
“Petition”), The Court, having reviewed and considered Petitioner's Petition, the
memorandum of points and authorities and declarations in support thereof, Twitter's
response thereto, the other related papers and pleadings on file herein, and with good
cause appearing therefore:
Petitioner's Petition is GRANTED. The Court finds that Petitioner has satisfied the
requirements of Krinsky v. Doe 6 (2008) 159 Cal. App. 4th 1154 as applied in ZL
Technologies, Inc. v. Does (2017) 13 Cal. App. 5th 603.
Twitter shall give its affected user, the Twitter account handle @marco87138252
(the “Account”), notice of this Order and Petitioner's Subpoena and allow the affected
user twenty-one (21) calendar days to file any petition to quash the Subpoena. If no
petition to quash is filed, Twitter is directed to provide responsive documents to
Petitioner's Subpoena within five (5) calendar days.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 9, 2021 CCL
fee Judge of the Superior Court
revs \M1 Liza Lapin
\Case No. CPF-21-517434 4 fPROP-} ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S
PETITION TO COMPEL TWITTER
Document Filed Date
June 09, 2021
Case Filing Date
May 03, 2021
Category
OTHER CIVIL PETITIONS
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.