Order: Richard Best Transfer, Inc. vs. Archer Daniels Midland Company

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA            o COUNTY OF      FRESNO                  F0      UR   SE  NLY
                                                Civil Division
                                                1130  O Street                    ‘




                                      Fresno,  California 93721—2220
                                                                                                                  JUN   22   2022

          PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:          Rlchard Best Transfer, Inc.                                        SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA
                                                                                                                  COUNTY 0F FRESNO
          DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:          Archer Daniels Midland Compan’y                                >
                                                                                                                                  DEPUTY

                                                                                                        CASE NUMBER.
                ORDER ON       REQUEST     FOR   PRETRIAL    DISCOVERY       CONFERENCE                               ”cecgmon
                                                                        ORDER
          The Request     for PreTriolDiscovery Conference        is:


           D     Denied.
                 Reoson(s)   for The  Denial:
           D     Insufficient meet 0nd confer efforts prior to filing The      Reques1    for Pretrial Discovery Conference.
           D     Failure to make    request on The Mandatory local form.
           D     Failure to provide a sufficient summary of The dispute.
           D     Failure 10 provide o proper privilege log.
           D     Failure 10 serve the   opposing    party wi1h o copy of The Request
                                                                           /
                                                                                             for PretrialDiscovery Conference.
           D     Other:



           D     The Cour’r   finds tho? the current dispute will     noT benefit  from o   Pretrial Discovery Conference.
                 D   PIoinfiff(s) D    Defendonfls)      D   Cross—comploinonfls)         D   Cross—defendonfls)       D  Other(s)   may file o
                     discovery motion limited To The dispute set ou’r in The Request for Pretrial           Discovery Conference.
                 Granted.


         The  Pretrial Discovery Conference        isseT for  7/7/2022        0T  2:30 p.m.        inDepartmenf      503

           D      Porfies ore ordered 10 bring       alldiscovery requests     0nd responses and evidence          of oll meet 0nd confer
                  ofiemp’rs.

           X      O’rher: Parties  may appear via      Coun‘COII.



         The Time   for filingo motion ’ro compel discovery on The disputed issues is Tolled            between The dcfe of The filing       of
         The request and the date of The Court's order Thereon.             CCP§201 6.080(C)(2).      The Coun‘ calculates this 10 be
         23       days.  CCP §§1013 and        10130   (4)apply.

          Refusal of  any counsel    fo participate    in a Pretrial DiscoveryConference shall be grounds, in the discretion
         of The Court, for entry of    on order adverse To The party represented by counsel so refusing, or adverse To counsel.

          A1 The conclusion of The Pretrial Discovery Conference, parties will be asked ’ro stipulate that the Court may issue
          on order odjudicofing ’rhe merHs of The discovery dispute, which is The subjecf of The Request for Prefriol‘Discovery
          Conference. See ofioched sfipulofion.



          Date:   6/22/2022                                                          /’