arrow left
arrow right
  • Daniil Pruglo, et al vs Ramada by Wyndham Marina, et al.Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited (23) document preview
  • Daniil Pruglo, et al vs Ramada by Wyndham Marina, et al.Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited (23) document preview
  • Daniil Pruglo, et al vs Ramada by Wyndham Marina, et al.Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited (23) document preview
  • Daniil Pruglo, et al vs Ramada by Wyndham Marina, et al.Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited (23) document preview
  • Daniil Pruglo, et al vs Ramada by Wyndham Marina, et al.Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited (23) document preview
  • Daniil Pruglo, et al vs Ramada by Wyndham Marina, et al.Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited (23) document preview
  • Daniil Pruglo, et al vs Ramada by Wyndham Marina, et al.Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited (23) document preview
  • Daniil Pruglo, et al vs Ramada by Wyndham Marina, et al.Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited (23) document preview
						
                                

Preview

PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF: REBECCA PRUGLO CASE NUMBER: RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT: RITESH PATEL d/b/a RAMADA BY WYNDHAM MARINA 20CV000819 ATTACHMENT 8b(2) - BALANCE FOR CLAIMANT Defendant(s) and/or their insurer(s) has agreed to make the following future periodic payments: Payee: Rebecca Pruglo $10,000.00 annually for 4 years, starting January 22, 2029, with the last guaranteed payment on January 22, 2032 A Lump Sum Payment of $20,000.00 paid on January 22, 2032 A Lump Sum Payment of $53,421.49 paid on January 22, 2036 The future payment amounts outlined above are guaranteed based upon a projected annuity purchase date of March 11, 2022. Any delay in funding the annuity may result in a delay of the payment dates or change in payment amounts that shall be recorded in the settlement agreement and release, qualified assignment document and annuity contract without the need of obtaining an amended Petition/Court Order up to 180 days after original purchase date. These payments have a present value of $92,042.31 and will be provided on a tax-free basis pursuant to Section 104(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended." The sum of $92,042.31 is to be used by Defendant(s) to arrange for the purchase of a tax-free structured settlement annuity policy from Metropolitan Tower Life Insurance Company. Defendant(s) and/or their insurer(s) shall execute a "Qualified Assignment" of its obligation to make periodic payments pursuant thereto in compliance with IRC Section 104(a)(2) and Section 130(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Said assignment shall be made to METLIFE ASSIGNMENT COMPANY INC. ("Assignee"). Upon doing so, Defendant(s) and/or their insurer(s) will no longer be obligated to make the future periodic payments and the Assignee will be the Plaintiff's sole obligor with respect to the future periodic payments, and Defendant(s) and/or their insurer(s) will have no further obligations whatsoever to the Plaintiff. The Assignee shall purchase structured settlement annuities for $92,042.31 through Metropolitan Tower Life Insurance Company which is rated A+ through A.M. Best. Lock in 239411 M. bercowetz 01/26/2022 REVSIED