arrow left
arrow right
  • MARY KAY INC.  vs.  xxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxxCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • MARY KAY INC.  vs.  xxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxxCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • MARY KAY INC.  vs.  xxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxxCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • MARY KAY INC.  vs.  xxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxxCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • MARY KAY INC.  vs.  xxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxxCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • MARY KAY INC.  vs.  xxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxxCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
						
                                

Preview

CAUSE NO. DC-18-05560 MARY KAY INC., § 1N THE DISTRICT COURT 0F Plaintiff, g v. g DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS xxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxx, g Defendant. g 116th JUDICIAL DISTRICT ORDER On July 25, 201 8, the Court held a hearing 0n Defendant Jaime xxxxx xxxxxxx’s Objection t0 Third Party Discovery Subpoenas Duces Tecum and Motion t0 Quash, filed June 8, 2018 (the “M0ti0n”). After considering the briefing, the evidence presented, and arguments of the parties, the Court DENIES the Motion and enters the following ORDERS regarding Plaintiff Mary Kay’s third—party discovery t0 Jenny Chavez; Chrissy Tighe, and Tighe, Kress & Orr (collectively the “Third Parties” 0r singularly a “Third Party”): Plaintiff shall deliver a signed copy of this Order t0 each 0f the Third Parties notifying them that the Court has directed, t0 the extent the Third Parties” response t0 Mary Kay’s subpoena production shall be duces tecum includes the production 0f documents, that such document delivered t0 counsel for Jaime xxxxx xxxxxxx, Gary D. Wilson, Esq., Wilson McCoy, P.A., Point 100 Building, 100 E. Sybelia Avenue, Suite 205, Maitland, Florida 3275 1. The Third Parties shall not produce any documents responsive to Mary Kay’s subpoena duces tecum directly t0 Mary Kay or Mary Kay’s counsel. Jaime xxxxx xxxxxxx’ counsel shall notify Mary Kay’s counsel, n0 later than one day after receipt 0f documents from the Third Parties, 0f their receipt 0f documents, identifying the party producing the documents and how many documents were produced. Jaime xxxxx xxxxxxx’ counsel shall have five business days from receipt 0f the documents from a Third Party t0 review the documents for confidential or highly confidential information. On the sixth business day after receipt 0f the documents from a Third Party, Jaime xxxxx xxxxxxx’ counsel shall either (1) provide the documents, appropriately marked as desired in accordance with the Court’s Agreed Protective Order and bates labeled, t0 counsel for Mary Kay; or, (2) file a motion for protection regarding those certain documents that Jaime xxxxx xxxxxxx maintains should not be produced in this case such motion for hearing at the Court’s earliest under any circumstances and promptly seek t0 set opportunity. SO ORDERED: Dated: August Q 2018 AGREED AS TO FORM: Dated: August 1, 201 8 /s/ Ryan K. Lurich /s/ Christopher J. Schwegmann Christopher Schwegmann, Esq. J. Ryan K. Lurich State Bar N0. 24013070 LYNN PINKER Cox & HURST, LLP rlurich@fflaw0ffice.com 2100 Ross Avenue, Suite 2700 FRIEDMAN & FIEGER, LLP Dallas, Texas 75201 5301 Spring Valley Road, Suite 200 Tel: (214)981-3800 Dallas, Texas 75254 Fax: (214) 981-3839 Tel: (972) 788—1400 Fax: (972) 788-2667 Gary D. Wilson* Florida Bar N0. 0846406 gwilson@wilsonmccoy1aw.com Point 100 Building 100 E. Sybelia Avenue, Suite 205 Maitland, Florida 32751 Tel: (407) 803-5400 Fax: (407) 803-4617 * Admitted Pro Hac Vice ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT xxxxx CRUISE xxxxxxx