arrow left
arrow right
  • MARY KAY INC.  vs.  xxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxxCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • MARY KAY INC.  vs.  xxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxxCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • MARY KAY INC.  vs.  xxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxxCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • MARY KAY INC.  vs.  xxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxxCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
						
                                

Preview

CAUSE NO. DC-18-05560 MARY KAY INC., § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF § Plaintiff, § § v. § DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS § xxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxx, § § Defendant. § 116TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ______ TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff Mary Kay Inc.’s (“Mary Kay”) Application for a Temporary Restraining Order (“the Application”). Upon consideration of the Application for a Temporary Restraining Order and the applicable authorities, this Court finds that Mary Kay is likely to prevail on the merits of its claims and will suffer imminent, irreparable injury with no adequate remedy at law, unless Defendant xxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxx (“xxxxxxx”) is immediately and temporarily enjoined. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant xxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxx, her agents, servants, employers, employees, attorneys and all persons or entities acting in concert or participation with her are prohibited from engaging in the following actions: a) Promoting, distributing, or selling to other members of the Mary Kay sales organization in the United States of America any products or services which are not produced, sold, or endorsed in writing by Mary Kay; b) Recruiting, directly or indirectly Mary Kay Beauty Consultants, Sales Directors, or National Sales Directors in the United States of America to sell products or services other than those sold by Mary Kay, or to use or permit any other person to use any names, mailing lists, or other information which xxxxxxx has obtained during her association with Mary Kay for recruiting or for promotion of the sale of any other company’s products or services; TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER PAGE 1 c) Soliciting or inducing, directly or indirectly, any Sales Director or Beauty Consultant to terminate their business relationship with Mary Kay, whether such solicitation or inducement be for xxxxxxx’s own account or that of others; d) Seeking, receiving or accepting, directly or indirectly, any fee, commission, override commission, financial benefit, contract right, monetary or non-monetary reward or other form of compensation from any other company or business organization based on or associated with the solicitation, recruitment, enrollment, or association by employment, contract, or otherwise for such company or business organization of any person whom xxxxxxx knows or has reason to believe is then under contract as a member of the Mary Kay sales organization. The Court finds that the requirements of TEXAS RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 683 are satisfied with respect to the entry of this Injunction. The Court finally ORDERS that this case is set for a hearing on Mary Kay’s Application for a Temporary Injunction on ________________________________________, 2018, and the amount of security to be given is set at $___________. This temporary restraining order expires in 14 days. IT IS SO ORDERED this ____ day of May, 2018. The Honorable Tonya Parker TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER PAGE 2