On January 22, 2013 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Rechsteiner, Eric J.,
and
Bown, David H.,
Freeland, Mike E.,
for Business Tort
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
ka 1
Dawn Taylor Esq Bar No
Saenz
The Historic Roosevelt Building
288610
v
S aDRT
pF 5AN N
BE STF
2
3638 University Ave Suite 246 SAN BRNARDItv
C
3 Riverside CA 92501
pUG 12 2013
Telephone 951 1233
682
d
a Facsimile
a
D
pUTY
D
5 gY
Attorney for Plaintiff
ERIC RECHSTEINER
s
SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
s COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
s UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
ERIC J RECHSTEINER an individual CASE NO CIVDS 1300658
1
Plaintiff ORDER AFTER EX RTE HEARING
PA
2
V
3
4 MIKE E FREELAND dba MUSIC
LESSONS CENTRAL MIKE E
15 FREELAND an individual DAVID H
BOWN dba MUSIC LESSONS CENTRAL
6
DAVID H BOWN an individual and DOES
10
1 INCLUSIVE
8 Defendants
9
o The Parte Application of Plaintiff Eric J Rechsteiner
Ex came on for Ex Parte hearing on
go 2013 in Dept the above
f entitled Court located at
d e onorable
la
22 j a Y1
pX GE BRIAN S
t McCARVfLLE
3 Presiding
4 In reading the application ofPlaintifF and good cause appearing therefore
5 IT IS ORDERED THAT the ex parte application ofPlaintiff Eric J Rechsteiner is hereby
6 GRANTED
7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT a temporary restraining order is issued against a11
Defendants restraining them their agents attorneys and representa
tives and all persons acting in
APPLICATION FOR TRO OSC FOR PRELINIINARY INJUNCTION DECLARATION
CIVDS 1300658
I
concert or participating with them from locking Plaintiff out of his private teaching studio within
2 MLC removing Plaintiff
sproperty within his private teaching studio inside MLC barring
3 s access to MLC
Plaintiff S voicemail system and MLC S wireless internet connection and
4 removing Plaintif
s phone jack withul his private teaching studio while this action is pending The
g f at M
3
g
s temporary restraining order sha11 expire on
s IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT an order to show cause hearing shall be held on
o of the above
entitled Court as to
7 Q I at gin Dept
M
s why a preliminary injunction should not issue against all nts restraining them their
Defenda
9 agents attorneys and representatives and all persons acting in concert or participating with them
o from locking Plaintiff out of his private teaching studio within MLC removing PlaintifP s property
within his private teaching studio inside MLC bazring Plaintiff saccess to MLC S voicemail
2 system and MLCS wireless internet connection and removing Plaintiff sphonejack within his
3 private teaching studio while this action is pending
4 This order the Ex Parte Application and Plaintiffs Motion and supporting papers shall be
h
s served by personal delivery on the attorney of record for
g n3
All papers opposing the motion shall be filed by Defendant by
8 Qy 2013 and shall be served by personal delivery on the attorney ofrecord
9 for Plaintiffs by 0 J3 2013
o All reply papers shall be filed by the attorney of record for Plaintiff by a
D
2013 and shall be served by personal delivery on the attorney ofrecord for Defendant
2 by j a 1 2013
3
4 Dated 7i
JUDGE BRlAN S L
McCARVtS
25 C
NDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
26
27
28
APPLICATION FOR TRO OSC FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION DECLARATION
CIVDS 1300658
Document Filed Date
August 12, 2013
Case Filing Date
January 22, 2013
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.