arrow left
arrow right
  • GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY VS VALIA VERA ET AL Auto Negligence document preview
  • GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY VS VALIA VERA ET AL Auto Negligence document preview
  • GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY VS VALIA VERA ET AL Auto Negligence document preview
  • GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY VS VALIA VERA ET AL Auto Negligence document preview
  • GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY VS VALIA VERA ET AL Auto Negligence document preview
  • GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY VS VALIA VERA ET AL Auto Negligence document preview
						
                                

Preview

Filing # 122424766 E-Filed 03/03/2021 02:29:45 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, a/a/o NICOLE MORAZAN, Plaintiff, CASE NO.: 2019-24552-CA-01 vs. VALIA VERA, ARIEL RODRIGUEZ, and CRISTOPHER RODRIGUEZ Defendant. ______________________________________________/ AMENDED ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Defendant, Christopher Rodriguez, by and through this undersigned attorney hereby files this Answer to the Plaintiff’s Complaint as follows: 1. Admitted. 2. Admitted. 3. Admitted. 4. Admitted. 5. Denied. 6. Admitted. 7. Denied. 8. Denied as phrased. 9. Without knowledge. 10. Denied. 11. Denied. 12. Defendant denies that the Plaintiff is entitled to judgment or to the relief sought. 13. Defendant denies all allegations of the Plaintiffs Complaint which are not specifically admitted herein and demands strict proof thereof. 14. Any and all allegations of liability, negligence, legal cause and damages of any kinds are specifically denied. 15. Defendant demands trial by jury of all issues so triable. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 16. As their first affirmative defense, Defendants state that the Plaintiff’s insureds negligence was the sole cause of the accident or contributed to the cause the accident and that any damages assessed against the Defendant’s must be reduced by an amount equal to the comparative degree of negligence of the Plaintiffs insureds. 17. As their second affirmative defense, Defendant state that third parties caused or contributed to cause the accident to such a degree or percentage that any damages assessed against the Defendant must be an amount equal to the comparative degree negligence of the third parties. 18. As their third affirmative defense, Defendants state that the accident falls within the provisions of the Florida No Fault Law effective on the date of he accident and the Defendant pleads all the defenses, exemptions, and set-offs available to him under the provisions under the Florida No-Fault Law. 19. As their fourth affirmative defense, Defendants state that the Plaintiff failed to mitigate its damages and any damages assessed against the Defendant must be reduced by an amount equal to Plaintiffs failure to mitigate. 20. As their fifth affirmative defense, Defendants state that the amount charged to repair Plaintiffs vehicle was unreasonable, excessive and not customary in the community. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was furnished via email service on this 3rd day of March 2021 at: Bruce H. Schiller, Esquire, Attorney for Plaintiff, 7900 Glades Road, Suite 405, Boca Raton, Florida 33434 at pleadings@yatesandschiller.com. LAW OFFICES OF TERRY M. TORRES & ASSOCIATES Employees of Infinity Insurance Company A KEMPER CORPORATION AFFILIATE THIS OFFICE IS NOT A PARTNERSHIP OR CORPORATION 8400 NW 36th Street, Suite 250 Miami, FL 33166 Telephone: (305) 714-3300 Facsimile: (305) 714-3301 Service Email: MiamiLegal@ipacc.com By:_____________________________________ Jonell T. Murphy, Esquire Florida Bar No.: 99578