On August 19, 2019 a
Answer
was filed
involving a dispute between
Geico Indemnity Company,
and
Rodriguez, Ariel,
Rodriguez, Cristofher,
Vera, Valia,
for Auto Negligence
in the District Court of Miami-Dade County.
Preview
Filing # 122424766 E-Filed 03/03/2021 02:29:45 PM
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA
GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY,
a/a/o NICOLE MORAZAN,
Plaintiff, CASE NO.: 2019-24552-CA-01
vs.
VALIA VERA, ARIEL RODRIGUEZ, and
CRISTOPHER RODRIGUEZ
Defendant.
______________________________________________/
AMENDED ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
Defendant, Christopher Rodriguez, by and through this undersigned attorney hereby
files this Answer to the Plaintiff’s Complaint as follows:
1. Admitted.
2. Admitted.
3. Admitted.
4. Admitted.
5. Denied.
6. Admitted.
7. Denied.
8. Denied as phrased.
9. Without knowledge.
10. Denied.
11. Denied.
12. Defendant denies that the Plaintiff is entitled to judgment or to the relief sought.
13. Defendant denies all allegations of the Plaintiffs Complaint which are not
specifically admitted herein and demands strict proof thereof.
14. Any and all allegations of liability, negligence, legal cause and damages of any
kinds are specifically denied.
15. Defendant demands trial by jury of all issues so triable.
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
16. As their first affirmative defense, Defendants state that the Plaintiff’s insureds
negligence was the sole cause of the accident or contributed to the cause the
accident and that any damages assessed against the Defendant’s must be
reduced by an amount equal to the comparative degree of negligence of the
Plaintiffs insureds.
17. As their second affirmative defense, Defendant state that third parties caused or
contributed to cause the accident to such a degree or percentage that any
damages assessed against the Defendant must be an amount equal to the
comparative degree negligence of the third parties.
18. As their third affirmative defense, Defendants state that the accident falls within
the provisions of the Florida No Fault Law effective on the date of he accident and
the Defendant pleads all the defenses, exemptions, and set-offs available to him
under the provisions under the Florida No-Fault Law.
19. As their fourth affirmative defense, Defendants state that the Plaintiff failed to
mitigate its damages and any damages assessed against the Defendant must be
reduced by an amount equal to Plaintiffs failure to mitigate.
20. As their fifth affirmative defense, Defendants state that the amount charged to
repair Plaintiffs vehicle was unreasonable, excessive and not customary in the
community.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was
furnished via email service on this 3rd day of March 2021 at: Bruce H. Schiller, Esquire,
Attorney for Plaintiff, 7900 Glades Road, Suite 405, Boca Raton, Florida 33434 at
pleadings@yatesandschiller.com.
LAW OFFICES OF
TERRY M. TORRES & ASSOCIATES
Employees of Infinity Insurance Company
A KEMPER CORPORATION AFFILIATE
THIS OFFICE IS NOT A PARTNERSHIP OR
CORPORATION
8400 NW 36th Street, Suite 250
Miami, FL 33166
Telephone: (305) 714-3300
Facsimile: (305) 714-3301
Service Email: MiamiLegal@ipacc.com
By:_____________________________________
Jonell T. Murphy, Esquire
Florida Bar No.: 99578
Document Filed Date
March 03, 2021
Case Filing Date
August 19, 2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.