arrow left
arrow right
  • LAMAR MITCHELL VS MIAMI-DADE COUNTY ET AL Auto Negligence document preview
  • LAMAR MITCHELL VS MIAMI-DADE COUNTY ET AL Auto Negligence document preview
  • LAMAR MITCHELL VS MIAMI-DADE COUNTY ET AL Auto Negligence document preview
  • LAMAR MITCHELL VS MIAMI-DADE COUNTY ET AL Auto Negligence document preview
						
                                

Preview

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT 0 AUGUST 13, 2021 $9; ; g E39 g C3: {:3 $357 544.33 LAMAR MITCHELL, CASE NO: 3020-15qg - ; 5:3 Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), 535' N: 3,2} vs. L.T. NO.: 19-89312}; (5 ,5: MlAMl-DADE COUNTY, (n no Appellee(s)/Respondent(s), Upon review of the Record on Appeal led on December 18, 2020, the Court has determined that the filed condensed transcripts fail to comply with the requirements of Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(4) and 9.220(c)(4). Any such condensed transcripts led after January 1, 2019, are hereby stricken. The appellant shall file transcripts that comply with the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure within forty five (45) days from the date of this Order. The properly formatted and paginated transcripts shall be led with a motion to supplement the record and the Initial Brief shall be amended to provide the correct citation to the relevant provision of the cited transcripts. The amended initial brief shall be led with the motion to supplement the record. Within fteen (15) days of the ling of the amended initial brief, the appellee shall le an amended answer brief to reflect accurate citations to the correctly formatted and paginated transcripts led with the motion to supplement the record. Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of this appeal. FERNANDEZ, C.J., and SCALES and LOBREE, JJ., concur. cc: Andres Alejandro Hermida Brian J. Lee Daniel Frastai Miami Dade Clerk ts