On May 09, 2022 a
Miscellaneous
was filed
involving a dispute between
Bryce Rosellini,
Kate Caraska,
and
Action Urgent Care, Inc.,
for Other Employment Unlimited (15)
in the District Court of Santa Clara County.
Preview
( (
CM-01
pS Ree ey TB TERE (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY 4
ip E. Carey SBN 155185
A Law Corporation
2100 Northrop Ave., Suite 900
Sacramento, CA. 95825
TELEPHONE NO: (916) 564-0706 raxno.. (916) 564-6455
ATTORNEY FOR (Namo): Kate Caraska and Bryce Rosellini
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Santa Clara
street appress: 19] N, First St.
MAILING ADDRESS:
cmyanozpcove: San Jose, 95113
BRANCH NAME:
CASE NAME:
CARASKA, ET AL v. ACTION URGENT CARE, INC., ET AL.
CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Complex Case Designation CASE HUMBER:
[7] unlimited [—] Limited
(Amount (Amount Counter Joinder Gee
demanded demanded is Filed with first appearance by defendant ”
exceeds $25,000) $25,000 or less) (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.402) DEPT:
ftems 1-6 below must be completed (see instructions on page 2).
1. Check one box betow for the case type that best describes this case:
Auto Tort Contract Provisionally Complex Clvit Litigation
Auto (22) Breach of contracttwarranty (06) (Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.400-3.403)
Uninsured motorist (46) Rule 3.740 collections (09) [5 antiirusitrade regulation (03)
Other PYPD/WD (Personal Injury/Property Other collgctions (09) Construction defect (10)
DamageWrangful Death) Tort Insurance Goverage (18) L_} Mass tort (40)
‘Asbestos (04) Other contract (37) {J securities litigation (28)
Product liability (24) Real Property {J EnvironmentaifToxic tort (30)
Medicat malpractice (45) Eminent domain/inverse Insurance coverage claims arising from the
Other PYPDWD (23) condemnation (14) above listed provisionally complex case
Non-PIIPDIWD (Other Tort Wrongful eviction (33) ‘ypas (41)
[J Business tortfuntair business practice (07) ‘Other real property (26) Enforcement of Judgment
LJ civitrights (8) Unlawful Detainer {_} Enforcement of judgment (20)
[J Defamation (13) Commercial (31) Miscellaneous Civil Complaint
Fraud (16) [J Residential (32) [_] rico e7)
Intellactual property (19) [J rugs (38) Olher complaint (not specified above) (42)
Professional nagligance (25) dudiclal Review Miscellaneous Civil Petition
Other non-PI/PD/WD tort (35) Asset forfeiture (05) Partnership and corporate governance (21)
Employment Petition re: arbitration award (11) [] other petition (no! specified above) (43)
[__} Wrongful termination (36) L_] writ of mandate (02}
wv] Other employment (15) [_] other judicial review (39)
2. Thiscase [ is ¥ isnot complex under rule 3.400 of the California Rules of Court. If the case is complex, mark the
factors requiring exceptional judicial management:
a. Large number of separately represented parties af] Large number of witnesses
b. J Extensive motion practice raising difficult or novel =e. CL Coordination with related actions pending in one or more courts
issues that will be time-consuming to resolve in other counties, states, or countries, or in a federal court
c.L_] Substantial amount of documentary evidence ft. L_] substantial post{udgment judicial supervision
Remedies sought (check all that apply): a._¥ | monetary b.L¥ | nonmonetai
Number of causes of action (specify): 10
This case [tis isnot aclass action suit.
If
Document Filed Date
May 09, 2022
Case Filing Date
May 09, 2022
Category
Other Employment Unlimited (15)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.