arrow left
arrow right
  • Caraska, et al. v. Action Urgent Care, Inc. (Class Action/PAGA) Other Employment Unlimited (15)  document preview
  • Caraska, et al. v. Action Urgent Care, Inc. (Class Action/PAGA) Other Employment Unlimited (15)  document preview
						
                                

Preview

( ( CM-01 pS Ree ey TB TERE (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY 4 ip E. Carey SBN 155185 A Law Corporation 2100 Northrop Ave., Suite 900 Sacramento, CA. 95825 TELEPHONE NO: (916) 564-0706 raxno.. (916) 564-6455 ATTORNEY FOR (Namo): Kate Caraska and Bryce Rosellini SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Santa Clara street appress: 19] N, First St. MAILING ADDRESS: cmyanozpcove: San Jose, 95113 BRANCH NAME: CASE NAME: CARASKA, ET AL v. ACTION URGENT CARE, INC., ET AL. CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Complex Case Designation CASE HUMBER: [7] unlimited [—] Limited (Amount (Amount Counter Joinder Gee demanded demanded is Filed with first appearance by defendant ” exceeds $25,000) $25,000 or less) (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.402) DEPT: ftems 1-6 below must be completed (see instructions on page 2). 1. Check one box betow for the case type that best describes this case: Auto Tort Contract Provisionally Complex Clvit Litigation Auto (22) Breach of contracttwarranty (06) (Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.400-3.403) Uninsured motorist (46) Rule 3.740 collections (09) [5 antiirusitrade regulation (03) Other PYPD/WD (Personal Injury/Property Other collgctions (09) Construction defect (10) DamageWrangful Death) Tort Insurance Goverage (18) L_} Mass tort (40) ‘Asbestos (04) Other contract (37) {J securities litigation (28) Product liability (24) Real Property {J EnvironmentaifToxic tort (30) Medicat malpractice (45) Eminent domain/inverse Insurance coverage claims arising from the Other PYPDWD (23) condemnation (14) above listed provisionally complex case Non-PIIPDIWD (Other Tort Wrongful eviction (33) ‘ypas (41) [J Business tortfuntair business practice (07) ‘Other real property (26) Enforcement of Judgment LJ civitrights (8) Unlawful Detainer {_} Enforcement of judgment (20) [J Defamation (13) Commercial (31) Miscellaneous Civil Complaint Fraud (16) [J Residential (32) [_] rico e7) Intellactual property (19) [J rugs (38) Olher complaint (not specified above) (42) Professional nagligance (25) dudiclal Review Miscellaneous Civil Petition Other non-PI/PD/WD tort (35) Asset forfeiture (05) Partnership and corporate governance (21) Employment Petition re: arbitration award (11) [] other petition (no! specified above) (43) [__} Wrongful termination (36) L_] writ of mandate (02} wv] Other employment (15) [_] other judicial review (39) 2. Thiscase [ is ¥ isnot complex under rule 3.400 of the California Rules of Court. If the case is complex, mark the factors requiring exceptional judicial management: a. Large number of separately represented parties af] Large number of witnesses b. J Extensive motion practice raising difficult or novel =e. CL Coordination with related actions pending in one or more courts issues that will be time-consuming to resolve in other counties, states, or countries, or in a federal court c.L_] Substantial amount of documentary evidence ft. L_] substantial post{udgment judicial supervision Remedies sought (check all that apply): a._¥ | monetary b.L¥ | nonmonetai Number of causes of action (specify): 10 This case [tis isnot aclass action suit. If