arrow left
arrow right
  • MARTIN -V- VI, INC. Print Product Liability Unlimited  document preview
  • MARTIN -V- VI, INC. Print Product Liability Unlimited  document preview
  • MARTIN -V- VI, INC. Print Product Liability Unlimited  document preview
  • MARTIN -V- VI, INC. Print Product Liability Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

02 23 20 r 2pm Prom T 219 P 014 017 F 063 suPEPic r COUY ii v e i LIFORNUk c v i RNARDl O W FilA Sia ISl RICT 2 APR 2018 3 Qy 4 Dep 1 5 6 7 8 SUPERiOR COURT QF TH STAT C1F CALIF RI TA 9 YN AND FUT THE CO CJNT Y O SAN E tNARDINU C NTYtAY DYCXA DTSTRICT 0 l l STYN MARTTN an individual CHRISTINA CASE NO CY V S 1517974 11 MARTIN an individual OT 7E t RE GOOD 1 Plainrtiffs FAITH S TTL MENT 13 vs j Date Timc Apri12 8 3U m 2018 14 VI INC dba V APE INDUSTRY a Cali ornia Dept S32 corppration CYG CrTY a business entity form Judge Hon Wilfxed J Schneider 3r 15 unl nown and DQ S 1 1QQ inclusi ve 15 Defendants Actio i Filed l ecernber 5 2015 Tria1 Date 7un 11 201 S 17 AND ALL LATET7 CROSS ACTYONS 4 l8 19 0 The Mption for r7etermination ofGoad aith Settlement as to DefendanUCross Comptainant 2l GLASS TECH WHOLESALES INC dba GT VAPE having been presented to this Court and TT 22 APPEARXI Cir 70 T TE SATTS ACTTON Or TT E COURT THAT tl e moCion is made pursuant to 23 Code uf Civil Procedure 877 6 24 T TE EFORE IT IS H REBY QRU It I THAT the settlement a re m nt described in 25 said motion was rriade and entered in good faith between the paxties to the a reement within the 26 meanin and effect of Code of Civil Procedure 877 6 and Tech 13idCInc v Woodward Clyde 27 Associares 1985 38 Ca1 3d 488 499 2 lll a ac oo a Far rrr s mrr NT G ICLIENTS15261P1cadings GT Vapc GfS MotionUvlrn 3FS Ordar wp i 02 23 20 9 1 2pm From T 219 P 015 017 F 063 1 IT IS FURTH R 01 7ER 1 that any jaint tartfeasor or co obligor is barred from any 2 further claims against Iaefe idant GLASS TECH WHQLESALES INC dba CrT VAPE forequitable 3 comparative contribuuon ar partial or camparati ve indemnit based upan comparative negligence 4 or corr parative fault and that all Complaints against Defendant CrLASS T C T WT OT SALE5 5 INC dba GT VAPE axe dismissed 6 t j 7 Dated 2 r Ion W ed J S ei er 1r 8 JCJD OF T SUPERIOR COURT 9 10 11 12 1 14 1S 16 li 17 1 19 20 2 2 23 24 25 27 2s PRQppS D ORDER RE GOOD FAIT I SETTLEMENT G ICl 1FN CS 5261 Pieudings QT Vape GFS Mocion Mm GFS Ordar wp 1