On December 02, 2016 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Bright Horizons Foster Family Agency A California Corporation,
Mathews, Carrie,
The Heart Matters Foster Family Agency A California Corporation,
and
Does 1-20,
Mathews, Carrie,
The Heart Matters Foster Family Agency A California Corporation,
for Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
a
1
2 SUPERIpq L
SAIV g
3
RN ERfvHR lpA
t i prv S pN
4
SEP 3 2019
5
Ho A P
aa Z
6 Pu
7
8 SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
9
Bright Horizons Foster Family Agency a Case No CIVDS1620395
10
California corporation
11
Plaintiff ORDER RE MOTION TO
12 v
COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES
13
Carrie Mathews The Heart matters Foster
14 Family Agency a California corporation
and DOES 1 through 20 inclusive Judge Cohn
15
Department S 26
Defendants
16
Ruling on Submitted matter 8 19 19
17 AND RELATED CROSS ACTION
ig The Court finds that former counsel for defendants Damon M Brown did not act
19 with substantial justification and therefore an award on monetary sanctions against
20 former counsel is appropriate Monetary sanctions are not appropriate against
21 defendants
22 The court has determined an appropriate award for having to bring these motions
is 2 500 00
23 Former Counsel Damon M Brown is ordered to pay sanctions to Plaintiff s
24 counsel within 30 days of service
25
26
DAVID COHN
27 Judge David S Cohn
28
Page 1
Bright liorizons v Mathews
PROP 05E ORDER RE MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES
S lawoffr 11079 OOBh9 OR22 Sanction Ordar dtx
1
2 PROOF OF SERVICE
3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
4
Iam employed in the County of Riverside State of California I am over the age of 18
5 and not a party to the within action my business address is3576 Arlington Ave Suite 210
Riverside CA 92506
6
On August 22 2019 Iserved the foregoing document s described as PROPOSED ORDER
RE MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES on the interested parties in this action
g by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed as follows
9 Rodney Diggs Damon M Brown
Ivie McNeil Wyatt Littler Mendelson
10 18th
444 S Flower Street Floor 2050 Main Street Suite 900
Los Angeles CA 90071 Irvine CA 92614
11
12
X By Mail
13 I am readily familiar with the firm s practice of collection and processing
correspondence for mailing Under that practice it would be deposited with U S postal
14 service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Riverside California in
the ordinary course business
of
I am aware that on motion of the party served service
15 is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one
day after the date of deposit for mailing an affidavit
16
By Overnight Courier I caused the above referenced document s to be delivered to
17
Golden State Overnight an overnight courier service for delivery to the above
addressee s
ig with a tracking number of
19 Executed on August 22 2019 at Riverside California
20 X State I declare under penalty of
perjury under the s of the State of California that
the above is true and correct
21
22
23
Lisa D Ballow
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2
Bright tlorizons v Mathews
PROPOSED ORDER RE MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES
S lawnffr 11079 00B 19 OR22 Sanction nrder doc
Document Filed Date
September 03, 2019
Case Filing Date
December 02, 2016
Category
Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
a 1 2 SUPERIpq L SAIV g 3 RN ERfvHR lpA t i prv S pN 4 SEP 3 2019 5 Ho A P aa Z 6 Pu 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 9 Bright Horizons Foster Family Agency a Case No CIVDS1620395 10 California corporation 11 Plaintiff ORDER RE MOTION TO 12 v COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES 13 Carrie Mathews The Heart matters Foster 14 Family Agency a California corporation and DOES 1 through 20 inclusive Judge Cohn 15 Department S 26 Defendants 16 Ruling on Submitted matter 8 19 19 17 AND RELATED CROSS ACTION ig The Court finds that former counsel for defendants Damon M Brown did not act 19 with substantial justification and therefore an award on monetary sanctions against 20 former counsel is appropriate Monetary sanctions are not appropriate against 21 defendants 22 The court has determined an appropriate award for having to bring these motions is 2 500 00 23 Former Counsel Damon M Brown is ordered to pay sanctions to Plaintiff s 24 counsel within 30 days of service 25 26 DAVID COHN 27 Judge David S Cohn 28 Page 1 Bright liorizons v Mathews PROP 05E ORDER RE MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES S lawoffr 11079 OOBh9 OR22 Sanction Ordar dtx 1 2 PROOF OF SERVICE 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 4 Iam employed in the County of Riverside State of California I am over the age of 18 5 and not a party to the within action my business address is3576 Arlington Ave Suite 210 Riverside CA 92506 6 On August 22 2019 Iserved the foregoing document s described as PROPOSED ORDER RE MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES on the interested parties in this action g by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed as follows 9 Rodney Diggs Damon M Brown Ivie McNeil Wyatt Littler Mendelson 10 18th 444 S Flower Street Floor 2050 Main Street Suite 900 Los Angeles CA 90071 Irvine CA 92614 11 12 X By Mail 13 I am readily familiar with the firm s practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing Under that practice it would be deposited with U S postal 14 service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Riverside California in the ordinary course business of I am aware that on motion of the party served service 15 is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after the date of deposit for mailing an affidavit 16 By Overnight Courier I caused the above referenced document s to be delivered to 17 Golden State Overnight an overnight courier service for delivery to the above addressee s ig with a tracking number of 19 Executed on August 22 2019 at Riverside California 20 X State I declare under penalty of perjury under the s of the State of California that the above is true and correct 21 22 23 Lisa D Ballow 24 25 26 27 28 Page 2 Bright tlorizons v Mathews PROPOSED ORDER RE MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES S lawnffr 11079 00B 19 OR22 Sanction nrder doc