arrow left
arrow right
  • Armand Santaguida v. Gertrude Hennessy, Eugene Hennessy Torts - Other Negligence (Trip & Fall) document preview
  • Armand Santaguida v. Gertrude Hennessy, Eugene Hennessy Torts - Other Negligence (Trip & Fall) document preview
  • Armand Santaguida v. Gertrude Hennessy, Eugene Hennessy Torts - Other Negligence (Trip & Fall) document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 08/20/2019 04:48 PM INDEX NO. 703470/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 27 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/20/2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF QUEENS --------------------------------------------X ARMAND SANTAGUIDA, Plaintiff, AFFIRMATION -against- Index No.: 703470/18 GERTRUDE HENNESSY AND EUGENE HENNESSY Defendants. ----------------------------------------------------------------------X MITCHELL SILBOWITZ, an attorney admitted to practice before the Courts of this State affirms the truth of the following under the penalty of perjury: 1. I am a member of SILBOWITZ, GARAFOLA, SILBOWITZ, SCHATZ & FREDERICK, LLP, attorneys for the Plaintiff herein and as such I am fully familiar with the facts and circumstances of this action based upon a review of the case file and the investigation materials contained therein. 2. This affirmation is submitted in connection with the Plaintiff s application for an Order restoring this case to the active Trial Calendar and extending plaintiff's time to file . a Note of Issue. 3. This is a negligence action to recover damages for serious injuries sustained by Plaintiff as a result of an accident which occurred on December 13, 2017. On said date, plaintiff an employee of the United States Postal Service was caused to trip and fall on the 813t front steps of premises 61-23 Street in Queens County while delivering mail to defendants. 1 of 3 FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 08/20/2019 04:48 PM INDEX NO. 703470/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 27 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/20/2019 4. Pursuant to the Compliance Conference Order dated November 5, 2018, plaintiff was directed to file a Note of Issue by July 12, 2019. (A copy of said Order is annexed as Exhibit "A"). 5. As plaintiff is a post office employee, federal regulations govern the acquisition of needed files,such as employment and the documents concerning investigation of the accident, and also the deposing of plaintiff's co-workers and supervisors. 6. By letterdated July 3, 2019, your Affiant informed the Court of this fact. The letter stated that while we have very recently received the results of our request for the investigative file,we are stillin the process of acquiring his employment file, and presently have a deposition of plaintiff's supervisor (a witness to the incident) scheduled for July 10d'. In the event that she does not appear, or her deposition does not yield the requisite information, we may be forced to pursue other lines of discovery, including depositions of other co-workers. The letter also requested that plaintiff's time to file a Note of Issue be extended in view of the foregoing or a conference scheduled. (A copy of the letteris annexed as Exhibit "B"). 7. The Court did not respond and our office lost track of the filing date while awaiting a reply. Law Office failure is a reasonable excuse for the failure to filea Note of Issue. 8. Moreover, plaintiff has a meritorious cause of action as demonstrated by his Affidavit of Merit annexed as Exhibit "C"). 9. It is obvious, from the foregoing, that plaintiff has not intended to abandon this litigation and that he and his attorneys have diligently prosecuted same. Plaintiff has also 2 of 3 FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 08/20/2019 04:48 PM INDEX NO. 703470/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 27 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/20/2019 set forth a reasonable excuse and a meritorious cause of action for his failure to file a Note of Issue within the time period provided by the Court. 10. Accordingly, it is requested that this matter be restored to the active Trial , Calendar and that the time within which to filea Note of Issue be extended as that discovery, crucial to plaintiff's case, may be conducted. The outstanding discovery is essential, relevant and material. 11. No prejudice accrues to defendants ifthe relief sought is granted. 12. No prior request for the relief requested herein has heretofore been made. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests the within motion be granted in all respects and that this Court grant such other and further relief as it deems just and proper. Dated: New York, NY August 20, 2019 MITCHELL SILBOWITZ 3 of 3