On October 12, 2018 a
Party Notice
was filed
involving a dispute between
Jackson, Felecia,
and
Mcallen Iii, Frank,
for Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
CIV 020
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY STATE BAR NO 2 GZ 4 O
NAME iJACK I ESENSTEN ESQ SBN 26240
FIRMNAME LAW OFFICE OF JACK I ESENSTEN
STREETADDRESS 4000 PALOS VERDES DRIVE NORTH STE 200
ciTv ROLLING HILLS ESTATES STATE CA ZIPCODE 90274
TELEPHONE NO 31 O 3 J 7 rJ rJ rJ 7 Fnx No ifaaiab e 310 5 4 4 5 03 6
faITl1 1 y 1 dW Cd
Yl0 tITla 11 COTTI S IP
E MAIL ADDRESS i
availableJ 1@
C rv
I
arroRNevFOR rvame FRANK MCALLEN III UfV y
T iiF
SAN p hNrSA r
j c FO
A
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 1P p xJt
r5 f O
i
2 4 7 3 rd
STREET ADDRESS W st
MqR 1
MAILINGADDRESS S3Ille o
c rrarvoziPcooe San Bernardino CA 92415
qy
BR 4NCHNAME SAN BERNARDINO COURT
M
PLAINTIFF PETITIONER FELECIA JACKSON McALLEN r
ps C y
p T1
DEFENDANT RESPONDENT FRANK MCALLEN III
CASE NUMBER
NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE
CIVDS1826610
1 Party intending to appear by telephone is
Plaintiff Petitioner
name
0 DefendanURespondent name Frank McAllen II I
0 Other name
2 The conference hearing or proceeding is fordescribe Order to Show Cause
date
set on Ap ri 1 1 2 02 0 at time 8 2 0 a m in department S 2 3
before name of judicial o cer if known
Date March 3 2020
Jack I Esensten Esa
TYPE OR PRINT NAME SIGNATURE
See Code of Civil Procedure section 367 5 and California Rules of Court ru e 3 670 to determine if a conference
hearing or proceeding is one generally considered appropriate for telephone appearance Note that a court may
determine on a hearing by hearing basis that a personal appearance is required Code Civ Proc 367 5 c
This form is intended only toprovide written notice to a court andparties asprovided in rule 3 670 h of the California
Rules of Court Check with the court to determine how to make arrangements for telephone services for an
appearance either directly with the court or through a court appointed vendor
Read California Rules of Court rule 3 670 h to determine when you have to file and serve notice of the
intent to appear
by telephone There are different deadlines depending upon the circumstances
1 On a regularly noticed hearing notice must be given at least two court days before the appearance Cal Rules of
Court rule 3 670 h 1 B or afterreceiving notice that another party will
be appearing telephonically by noon on
the court day before the appearance Cal Rules of Court rule3 670 h 2
2 On an ex parte application notice must be given by an applicant by 10 00 a m two court days before the hearing
Cal Rules ofCourt rule 3 670 h 3 B Any party other than an applicant may give notice by 2 00 p m or the
close of business as thatterm is defined inrule 2 251 whichever is earlieron the court day before an ex parte
appearance Cal Rules of Court rule 3 670 h 4
Page 1 of 1
Form Approved for Optional Use Code of Civil Procedure
367 5
Judicial Council
ofCalifornia NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE
lAt I1S CalRules of Court rule 3 670
CIV 020 Rev 1
January2016 P
w
1 PROOF OF SERVICE
2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
3 I am employed in the County of Los Angeles State of California Iam over the age of
18 and not a party to the within action my business address is 4000 Palos Verdes Drive
4 North Suite 200 Rolling Hills Estates California 90274
5 On the date written below I served NOTICE OF INTENTION TO APPEAR BY
TELEPHONE on interested parties in this action the original X a true
by placing
6 copy thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes addressed as foT s
7 Felecia Jackson McAllen
1474 Medical Center Drive
8 San Bernardino CA 92411
9
X BY MAIL
10 1 deposited such envelope in the mail at Rolling Hills Estates California
I am readily familiar with the firm s practice of collection and processing
11 correspon nce for mailing Under that practice it would be deposited with U S postal
service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Rolling Hills Estates
12 California in the ordinary course of business I am aware that on motion of the party
served service is presumed invalid ifpostal cancellation date or postage meter date is
13 more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit
14 BY PERSONAL SERVICE
I ersonally caused such envelopes to be delivered by hand to the office of
15 the addressee s above on
16
BY FAX I transmitted a true copy of said document by facsimile machine
17 pursuant to Rule 2005 The facsimile machine Iused com lied with Rule 2003 3 and no
error was reported by the machine Pursuant to Rule 2005 I caused the machine to print
18 a transmission record of the transmission a copy of which is attached to this declaration
Said fax transmission s occurred at m on the below written date Said fax
19 transmissions s were directed as fol ow
20
Executed March 3 2020 Hills Estates California
on at Rolling Ideclare under penalty of
21 perjury unde the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct
22
23
24 ia ar son
25
26
27
28
Document Filed Date
March 05, 2020
Case Filing Date
October 12, 2018
Category
Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.