arrow left
arrow right
  • JACKSON -V- MCALLEN Print Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice Unlimited  document preview
  • JACKSON -V- MCALLEN Print Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice Unlimited  document preview
  • JACKSON -V- MCALLEN Print Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice Unlimited  document preview
  • JACKSON -V- MCALLEN Print Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

CIV 020 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY STATE BAR NO 2 GZ 4 O NAME iJACK I ESENSTEN ESQ SBN 26240 FIRMNAME LAW OFFICE OF JACK I ESENSTEN STREETADDRESS 4000 PALOS VERDES DRIVE NORTH STE 200 ciTv ROLLING HILLS ESTATES STATE CA ZIPCODE 90274 TELEPHONE NO 31 O 3 J 7 rJ rJ rJ 7 Fnx No ifaaiab e 310 5 4 4 5 03 6 faITl1 1 y 1 dW Cd Yl0 tITla 11 COTTI S IP E MAIL ADDRESS i availableJ 1@ C rv I arroRNevFOR rvame FRANK MCALLEN III UfV y T iiF SAN p hNrSA r j c FO A SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 1P p xJt r5 f O i 2 4 7 3 rd STREET ADDRESS W st MqR 1 MAILINGADDRESS S3Ille o c rrarvoziPcooe San Bernardino CA 92415 qy BR 4NCHNAME SAN BERNARDINO COURT M PLAINTIFF PETITIONER FELECIA JACKSON McALLEN r ps C y p T1 DEFENDANT RESPONDENT FRANK MCALLEN III CASE NUMBER NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE CIVDS1826610 1 Party intending to appear by telephone is Plaintiff Petitioner name 0 DefendanURespondent name Frank McAllen II I 0 Other name 2 The conference hearing or proceeding is fordescribe Order to Show Cause date set on Ap ri 1 1 2 02 0 at time 8 2 0 a m in department S 2 3 before name of judicial o cer if known Date March 3 2020 Jack I Esensten Esa TYPE OR PRINT NAME SIGNATURE See Code of Civil Procedure section 367 5 and California Rules of Court ru e 3 670 to determine if a conference hearing or proceeding is one generally considered appropriate for telephone appearance Note that a court may determine on a hearing by hearing basis that a personal appearance is required Code Civ Proc 367 5 c This form is intended only toprovide written notice to a court andparties asprovided in rule 3 670 h of the California Rules of Court Check with the court to determine how to make arrangements for telephone services for an appearance either directly with the court or through a court appointed vendor Read California Rules of Court rule 3 670 h to determine when you have to file and serve notice of the intent to appear by telephone There are different deadlines depending upon the circumstances 1 On a regularly noticed hearing notice must be given at least two court days before the appearance Cal Rules of Court rule 3 670 h 1 B or afterreceiving notice that another party will be appearing telephonically by noon on the court day before the appearance Cal Rules of Court rule3 670 h 2 2 On an ex parte application notice must be given by an applicant by 10 00 a m two court days before the hearing Cal Rules ofCourt rule 3 670 h 3 B Any party other than an applicant may give notice by 2 00 p m or the close of business as thatterm is defined inrule 2 251 whichever is earlieron the court day before an ex parte appearance Cal Rules of Court rule 3 670 h 4 Page 1 of 1 Form Approved for Optional Use Code of Civil Procedure 367 5 Judicial Council ofCalifornia NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE lAt I1S CalRules of Court rule 3 670 CIV 020 Rev 1 January2016 P w 1 PROOF OF SERVICE 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 3 I am employed in the County of Los Angeles State of California Iam over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action my business address is 4000 Palos Verdes Drive 4 North Suite 200 Rolling Hills Estates California 90274 5 On the date written below I served NOTICE OF INTENTION TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE on interested parties in this action the original X a true by placing 6 copy thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes addressed as foT s 7 Felecia Jackson McAllen 1474 Medical Center Drive 8 San Bernardino CA 92411 9 X BY MAIL 10 1 deposited such envelope in the mail at Rolling Hills Estates California I am readily familiar with the firm s practice of collection and processing 11 correspon nce for mailing Under that practice it would be deposited with U S postal service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Rolling Hills Estates 12 California in the ordinary course of business I am aware that on motion of the party served service is presumed invalid ifpostal cancellation date or postage meter date is 13 more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit 14 BY PERSONAL SERVICE I ersonally caused such envelopes to be delivered by hand to the office of 15 the addressee s above on 16 BY FAX I transmitted a true copy of said document by facsimile machine 17 pursuant to Rule 2005 The facsimile machine Iused com lied with Rule 2003 3 and no error was reported by the machine Pursuant to Rule 2005 I caused the machine to print 18 a transmission record of the transmission a copy of which is attached to this declaration Said fax transmission s occurred at m on the below written date Said fax 19 transmissions s were directed as fol ow 20 Executed March 3 2020 Hills Estates California on at Rolling Ideclare under penalty of 21 perjury unde the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct 22 23 24 ia ar son 25 26 27 28