arrow left
arrow right
  • USA Medicare Advisors Insurance Agency LLC, et al Plaintiff vs. Elite Health Investents Inc, et al Defendant 3 document preview
  • USA Medicare Advisors Insurance Agency LLC, et al Plaintiff vs. Elite Health Investents Inc, et al Defendant 3 document preview
  • USA Medicare Advisors Insurance Agency LLC, et al Plaintiff vs. Elite Health Investents Inc, et al Defendant 3 document preview
  • USA Medicare Advisors Insurance Agency LLC, et al Plaintiff vs. Elite Health Investents Inc, et al Defendant 3 document preview
						
                                

Preview

Filing# 139405899 E-Filed 11/30/2021 07:05:21 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. CACE21010364 DIVISION 18 JUDGE Fabienne Fahnestock USA Medicare Advisors Insurance Agency LLC, et al / Petitioner(s) Plaintiff(s) V. Elite Health Investents Inc, et al Defendant(s)/ Respondent(s) ' AGREED ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS I, II, AND IV OF DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIM, PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT'S AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S DISCOVERY REOUESTS THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on Plaintiff USA Medicare Advisors Insurance Agency LLC's (hereinafter, "Plaintiff" or "UMA") Motion to Dismiss Counts I,Il,and IV of Defendant Elite Health Investments, Inc.'s ("Defendant") Counterclaim ("Motion to Dismiss") and Motion to Strike Defendant's Affirmative Defenses or, in the Alternative, For a More Definite Statement ("Motion to Strike")filed on September 8, 2021, and upon Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Discovery Requests ("Motion for Extension") filed on November 2, 2021, and the Court having considered the Motion, having been advised of the agreement of counsel, and being otherwise duly advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that: 1. Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in lightof the express written contract between the parties covering the bases for said counterclaims. See Williams v. Bear Stearns & Co., 725 So. 2d 397, 400 (Fla.5th DCA 1998); Baron v. Osman, 39 So. 2d 449, 451 (Fla. *** FILED: BROWARD COUNTY, FL BRENDA D. FORMAN, CLERK 11/30/2021 07:06:38 PM.**** CaseNo: CACE21010364 Page 2 of 2 5th DCA 2010); 2. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part without prejudice. Only Defendant's seventh, catch-all affirmative defense is stricken (with the abilityfor Defendant to file for leave to amend if warranted under the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure); and 3. Defendant's Motion for Extension is GRANTED insofar as Defendant shall have up to and through seven (7) days from execution of this agreed order to serve its responses to Plaintiffs discovery requests. DONE and ORDERED Broward County, Florida on 1-30-2021. Chambers, H in at 1 ffkLAG