arrow left
arrow right
  • RAUL MEJIA ET AL VS PEDRO LOPEZ (PROPERTY APPRAISER) ET AL Declaratory Judgment document preview
  • RAUL MEJIA ET AL VS PEDRO LOPEZ (PROPERTY APPRAISER) ET AL Declaratory Judgment document preview
  • RAUL MEJIA ET AL VS PEDRO LOPEZ (PROPERTY APPRAISER) ET AL Declaratory Judgment document preview
  • RAUL MEJIA ET AL VS PEDRO LOPEZ (PROPERTY APPRAISER) ET AL Declaratory Judgment document preview
						
                                

Preview

Filing # 113047648 E-Filed 09/09/2020 09:25:39 AM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO: 2018-012371-CA-01 SECTION: CA10 JUDGE: Peter R. Lopez RAUL MEJIA et al Plaintiff(s) vs. PEDRO LOPEZ (PROPERTY APPRAISER) et al Defendant(s) ____________________________/ ORDER ON INTENT TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION THIS CAUSE having come before the Court for hearing pursuant to the Order to Appear on the intent to dismiss for lack of prosecution, in accordance with Rule 1.420(e), Fla.R.Civ.P., and the Party(ies) having been timely and properly noticed for the hearing, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: [X] The case shall REMAIN PENDING. The Court finds that the Party(ies) appeared and affirmatively established at least one of the five grounds set forth below: 1. There had been record activity within ten (10) months prior to service of this Notice and Order to Appear; or 2. A stay of the action was in effect within the ten (10) months prior to service of this Notice and Order to Appear; or 3. There has been record activity within sixty (60) days immediately following the service of this Notice and Order to Appear; or 4. The Court issued a stay of the action within sixty (60) days immediately following the service of this Notice and Order to Appear; or 5. At least five (5) days before the hearing, the party opposing the dismissal established good cause, in writing, for the action to remain pending. [_] The case is DISMISSED for lack of prosecution. The Court finds that the Party(ies) failed to affirmatively establish at least one of the five grounds set forth above. Case No: 2018-012371-CA-01 Page 1 of 2 [X] Plaintiff appeared [_] Defendant appeared [_] No appearance DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at Miami-Dade County, Florida on this 9th day of September, 2020. 2018-012371-CA-01 09-09-2020 9:14 AM Hon. Peter R. Lopez CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE Electronically Signed No Further Judicial Action Required on THIS MOTION CLERK TO RECLOSE CASE IF POST JUDGMENT Electronically Served: Andre Alexander Gibson, AAGibson@Gibsontaxlaw.com Andre Alexander Gibson, EFile@Gibsontaxlaw.com Ely Gonzalez, Ely.Gonzalez@miamidade.gov Florida Attorney General's Office, oag.civil.eservice@myfloridalegal.com Michael Mastrucci, mastrucc@miamidade.gov Michael Mastrucci, wilma.morillo@miamidade.gov Michael Postell, mjftlaud@gmail.com Timothy E Dennis, timothy.dennis@myfloridalegal.com Timothy E Dennis, jon.annette@myfloridalegal.com Timothy E Dennis, rebecca.padgett@myfloridalegal.com Physically Served: Case No: 2018-012371-CA-01 Page 2 of 2