arrow left
arrow right
  • MANOLAKOS, JAMES N V HIMEBACK, RONALD PAUL AUTO NEGLIGENCE document preview
  • MANOLAKOS, JAMES N V HIMEBACK, RONALD PAUL AUTO NEGLIGENCE document preview
  • MANOLAKOS, JAMES N V HIMEBACK, RONALD PAUL AUTO NEGLIGENCE document preview
  • MANOLAKOS, JAMES N V HIMEBACK, RONALD PAUL AUTO NEGLIGENCE document preview
						
                                

Preview

Filing # 140035660 E-Filed 12/09/2021 12:11:49 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO: 50-2021-CA-007517-XXXX-MB JAMES N. MANOLAKOS, Plaintiff, vs. RONALD PAUL HIMEBACK, Defendant. / PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME ON DEFENDANT’S 11-09-21 INTERROGATORIES Plaintiff, JAMES N. MANOLAKOS (hereinafter Plaintiff), by and through his undersigned attorneys, for extension of time to answer the 11-09-21 interrogatories of Defendant RONALD PAUL HIMEBACK (hereinafter Defendant) and moves for a protective order and for grounds states as follows: 1. This matter is currently not set for trial. Talre dant areal tntawnn natantnn a ae cha 11 ANAL VTLCUUALLL STLVEU LILCLIOBALOLICS Oli OF ADOUL L1-UY-Z1. 9 2. 3. From the very inception of this case Plaintiff's counsel has been attempting to schedule depositions related to the subject which Defendant seeks answers to interrogatories interro gatories, 4. Plaintiff had depositions rescheduled and then canceled at the request of the City of West Palm Beach and/or Defendant on more than one occasion. CHEN. DAIAARCACUAAIINTY Cl INGEDU ARDIIV7ZN FLEDY 49INAINNN 49.44.40 DMA PILL. PAL DUA VUUINE TT, PL, vUOL II mDnuecy, ULL, Ierugeue! 12.1 to ci5. Defendant cannot expect Plaintiff to answer the type of interrogatories being propounded without a full and fair opportunity for Plaintiff to do discovery. 6. Defendant would not be prejudiced by an extension given the above facts. 7. The interrogatories may involve objectionable matter. Accordingly, Plaintiff request that the extension include time to file any objections. MEMO OF LAW Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1.340(a) states that the “court may allow a shorter or longer time” to answer interrogatories. Plaintiff requests that the court allow an additional thirty (30) days to file answers after the previously scheduled depositions have been concluded, including any objections. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests the court’s order granting an extension of time as set forth above, including any objections. Thereby certify that on this G day of December, 2021 a true and accurate copy of the Torgoing was e-served by filing it with the Circuit Court and furnished by email to: dstephens@oslegal.com, LOlds@oslegal.com, volds@oslegal.com, agagnon@oslegal.com PPecaro@lawdrive.com and gigi@lawdrive.com. Philip Alain Stillman, Esa, Bader Stillman, P.L. 6100 W Atlantic Blvd #5 and Margate, FL 33063 Tel: (954) 971-3399 phil@baderstillman.com Florida Bar No.: 653860 Dieon C, Asencin PA BU We EROUHIOLU, deeds 4440 PGA Blvd. Suite 600 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Tel: es en Email; diego634¢@ag By: Cre Di edb C. Asencio, Esa. Florida Bar No.: 352942