Motion to Amend in Iskyo Aronov Plaintiff vs. Sound Connection Distributors Inc, et al Defendant| Trellis.Law

On September 03, 2021 a Complaint,Petition was filed involving a dispute between Aronov, Iskyo, and 2801 Greene Street Llc, Sound Connection Distributors Inc, Swissa, Shimon, for 3 in the District Court of Broward County.

Preview
Filing# 143006504 E-Filed 01/31/2022 06:55:55 PM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND
FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

ISKYO ARONOV, a Florida
Resident,

Plaintiff, Case No. CACE-21-016867

SOUND CONNECTION DISTRIBUTORS,
INC., a Florida for Profit Corporation,and
SHIMON SWISSA, a/k/a SHIMMON SWISSA,
a Florida Resident,

Defendants.
i

PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
ISKYO
Plaintiff, ARONOV, by and through
a Florida resident ("Aronov") ("Plaintiff'),

its undersigned Counsel, files this First Amended Complaint pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.190

against Defendants, SOUND CONNECTION DISTRIBUTORS, INC., a Florida for-profit

Corporation,and SHIMON SWISSA, a/kja SHIMMON SWISSA, a Florida resident,and in

support thereof allegesas follows:

PARTIES, JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. Plaintiff Aronov is an individual and resident o f Miami-Dade County, Florida.

2. Defendant, Sound Connection Distributors,Inc. ("Sound"), is a Florida for-profit

Corporationwhich conducts business in Broward County, with a principaladdress of 2801

Greene Street,Hollywood, FL 33020.

3 Defendant, Shimon Swissa a/k/a Shimmon Swissa ("Swissa"),is an individual

and resident of Miami-Dade County, Florida and is otherwise suijuris.

*** FILED: BROWARD COUNTY, FL BRENDA D. FORMAN, CLERK 01/31/2022 06:55:55 PM.****
4. This is an action for damages that exceeds $30,000.00 exclusive of costs, interest,

and attorneys'
fees.

5. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to Florida Statute Section 47.011 and

47.051 as Broward County is the county where the causes of action accrued and where

under the Agreement.
its obligations
Plaintiffperformed

6. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to Florida Statute Section 47.011 and

47.051 as Broward County is the county where the property in litigation
is located,with an

address of: 2801 Greene Street,Hollywood, Florida,33020.

7. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to Florida Statute Section 47.021 as one or

more Defendant(s)resides or has placeof business in
a principal Broward County.

GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
8 On or about March 22, 2019, Plaintiff Aronov entered into a written and signed

..,

Agreement, in two writings(hereinafter
"the Agreement") with Defendant Swissa, who, upon

information and belief,is the principalshareholder of Defendant Sound. This Agreement is

marked and attached hereto as composite Exhibit "A."

9- The subjectof the Agreement was the Business and property located at: 2801

Greene Street,Hollywood, Florida,33020 (hereinafter
"the Property").

10. Defendant Swissa is also the President of Defendant Sound, and on information

and belief,is the principalor sole shareholder ofDefendant Sound.

11. Defendant Sound is the owner of the Property, but part of Plaintiff's Agreement

with Defendant Swissa was that the Property would be transferred by Defendant Sound, to a

new entity,named 2801 Greene Street,LLC (hereinafter
"the new entity?)

2
12. Swissa agreed to first pay off the two existing"partners"on the Property, to

unwind their respectiveShareholder Agreements, which would allow him to reobtain 100%

interest in the Property. Swissa would then cause Defendant Sound to transfer the Property to

the new entityby using his ownersh* and control of Defendant Sound, therebycausingthe

transfer. This was to be done once Plaintiff sent the necessary funds. Plaintiff agreed to

furnish said funds via the trust account of Joseph Timlichman Law, PLLC (hereinafter

"Timlichman"). Composite Exhibit "A" is signedby Defendant Swissa in his personal

capacity.

13. because the Property
Additionally, is an investment property which produces

rental income, Plaintiff and Defendant agreed as part ofthe Agreement to allocate 50% of all

rental income to Plaintiff Aronov and 50% to Defendant Swissa to be paid by Defendant

Sound or the new entity.(See Composite Exhibit "A").

14. In reliance on the above and pursuant to the Agreement, Plaintiff distributed the

agreed upon $1,600,000.00, which series of payments were first wired through the trust

account of Timlichman, and then paid over to Defendant Swissa.

15. This was done so Swissa could buy out the partners/creditors
of its existing

shares,reacquire100% interest in the Property and use his control over the stock to order

Sound to transfer the Property to the new entityper the Agreement.

16. According to the Agreement, Defendants were obligatedto make Plaintiff a

partner of 2801 Greene Street,LLC, once the two priorpartners'respectiveShareholder

Agreements were unwound. While the Agreements were unwound with Plaintiff's money,

Plaintiff Aronov was never made a partner.

3
17. In fact,Defendant Swissa received $1.6 million from the Plaintiff,
paid offthe

priorpartners with whom they had entered into a settlement agreement to unwind its

respectiveShareholder Agreements, but blatantlyand egregiouslyfailed to uphold any of his

to the
obligations Plaintiff under the Agreement.

18. To this day, Defendants have failed to add Plaintiff as a partner in the new entity,

have not made him an officer in the new entity,
have failed to give him any money received

as rental income, failed to transfer title to the property to the new entity,
and have failed to

uphold any of their obligationsunder the Agreement.

19. All conditions precedent,statutory or otherwise,to the maintenance of this action

have been performed,waived, excused, or otherwise occurred.

20. Plaintiff Aronov has engaged and retained undersigned Counsel and is obligatedto

pay fees for the prosecutionof this Action. Defendants should be liable to reimburse Plaintiff

for reasonable attorneys'
fees and costs in the prosecutionof this matter.

COUNTI
BREACH OF CONTRACT
21. Plaintiff Aronov of paragraphs 1 through 20
hereby incorporatesthe allegations

above as if fullyset forth herein.

22. Plaintiff entered into a written Contract and Agreement with Defendant Shimon

a/k/a Shimmon Swissa in his personalcapacityon or about March 22,2019. (Composite

Exhibit "A").

23. The written Agreement contained a provisionwhereby Defendant Swissa was

obligatedto order or cause Defendant Sound to transfer the Property to a new entityby using

his ownersh* and control over Sound's stock. This was to occur immediately after the two

4
partners were paid off and their Shareholder Agreements were unwound. (See composite

Exhibit "A").

24. Defendant Swissa received $1.6 million from the Plaintiff,
through Timlichman's

trust account, in a series of payments, and paid offthe prior"partners,"
therebyunwinding

both Shareholder Agreements.

25. Plaintiffperformedits obligationsunder the Agreement by transferring
$1.6

million to Defendant Swissa, sent through Timlichman's trust account.

26. Defendants breached the written Contract and Agreement, inter alia,by failingto

order the transfer of the Property to the new entityafter funds were received from the

Plaintiff.

27. Defendants breached the written Contract and Agreement by failingto add

Plaintiff as a partner in the new entity, to make him an
failing officer of the new entity,

to give him any money received as rental income, and failing
failing to uphold any of their

obligationsas requiredby the Agreement.

28. The Defendants' numerous breaches were material in nature, and Plaintiff relied

on the Defendants' representations
regardingthe transfer of the Property and his equity/right

to rental income from the Property.

29. Defendants' numerous breaches, include the failure to transfer,to this day, the

Property or allocate Plaintiff his equity and rental income amounts as per the Agreement.

30. As a direct and proximate result of the Defendants' above listed breaches and

Plaintiff Aronov has suffered damages, including,
representations, but not limited to, the $1.6

million paid out, compensatory and consequentialdamages and attorneys'fees.

5
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff ARONOV demands judgment against the Defendants for:

damages to be determined at trial togetherwith prejudgment and post judgment interests and

costs, and attorneys'fees, and for such other and further relief as this Court deems just and

proper.

COUNT II
DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
31. Plaintiff Aronov of paragraphs 1 through 20
hereby incorporatesthe allegations

above as if fullyset forth herein.

32. There is a bona fide,actual,present, and practicalneed for a declaration as to the

rightsof the partiesas to: (i)whether the Defendants breached the Contract with Plaintiff;
(ii)

whether the Defendants breached their duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealings;(iii)
whether

performance of the contract as per the agreement and; (iv)
the Plaintiff is entitled to specific

whether the Plaintiff is entitled to an equitable
trust established by this Court to properly

allocate the shares and interests in the in the Property, and the rental income from the
entity,

Property.

33. The facts and
underlyingthe written Agreement, Defendants' obligations,

breaches thereof,are valid and are presentlyor easilyascertainable and support the entry of a

judgment. The partieshave legalor equitablerelations affected by the
declaratory

Defendants' actions and requirejudicialconfirmation as to their rightsand interests and are

entitled to have their rightsvalidated by this Court.

34. Plaintiff and Defendants have adverse interests with respect to the new entity,
the

Property and the equity and interest in rental income thereof and are all properly before this

Court.

6
35. Pursuant to Fla. Stat. 86.011 et. seq., PlaintiffAronov seeks a declaratory

judgment as to: (i)whether the Defendants breached the Contract with Plaintiff; whether
(ii)

the Defendants breached their duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealings;(iii)
whether the

Plaintiff is entitled to specificperformance of the contract as per the agreement and; (iv)

whether the Plaintiff is entitled to an equitabletrust established by this Court to properly

allocate the shares and interests in the entity,
in the Property and the rental income from the

Property.

36. The Defendants, through actions,practicesand expressed positions,has shown an

interest that is actual,present, adverse, and to the
antagonistic Plaintiff' s respectiverightsand

interests described in this Amended Complaint.

37. The Defendants' antagonisticand adverse interest is before the Court by proper

process.

38. The relief sought is not merely the giving of legaladvice by the Courts or the

answer to but would resolve questionsrelated to
questionspropounded from curiosity this

bona fide controversy in a manner that would assist the partiesin resolvingtheir dispute.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests the entry of a declaratoryjudgment resolvingthe facts

and issues set forth hereinabove.

COUNT III
SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE
39. Plaintiff Aronov of paragraphs 1 through 20
hereby incorporatesthe allegations

above as if fullyset forth herein.

40. Pursuant to Florida Statute Section 86.081 and §86.061, Plaintiff seeks specific

performance of the Agreement, and an order from this Court directing
the Defendants to

convey the Property in accordance with the Agreement.

7
41. The Property in question,and the rental income therefrom, are unique in nature

and constitute bargained-forconsideration which cannot
to Plaintiff, be replacedsolelyby an

award of money damages. Plaintiff would be irreparablyharmed if the subjectProperty is not

conveyed to Plaintiff in a manner that will allow Plaintiffto receive the benefit of his

bargain.Accordingly,this Court should order specificperformance of the Agreement.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff seeks specificperformance of the Agreement.

COUNT IV
BREACH OF THE COVENANT OF GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING
42. Plaintiff Aronov of paragraphs 1 through 20
hereby incorporatesthe allegations

above as if fullyset forth herein.

43. On or about March 22,2019, Defendant Swissa entered and executed the

Agreement with Plaintiff Aronov and was bound by all its terms, conditions,and obligations.

44. The Agreement is a valid,binding Contract.

45. Plaintiff Aronov reasonably expected to receive all the benefits and entitlements

as bargained and provided for in the Agreement, includingthe promise by Defendant Swissa

to transfer the Property,by using his stock ownership and control to cause Defendant Sound

to make the transfer into a new entity.

46. Plaintiff Aronov reasonablyexpected to receive all the benefits and entitlements

as bargained and provided for in the Agreement, particularly
after Plaintiff performed its

obligations through Timlichman's
under the Agreement by wire transferring, trust account,

$1,600,000.00 to the Defendants so they could pay offthe prior"partners"on the Property.

Defendants have not performed any of their obligationsunder the Agreement.

8
47. The covenant of good faith and fair dealingwas implied in the Agreement, and

the above-named Defendants had a duty to act in good faith and deal fairly
with Plaintiff

Aronov.

48. The covenant of good faith and fair dealingimposed a duty on the above-named

Defendants not to commit any act that would injurethe rightso f Aronov to receive the

expected benefits of the Agreement.

49. Plaintiff Aronov proceeded in good faith to fulfill his duties and obligations
under

the Agreement and was continuingto do so at the time that the above-named Defendants

breached the Agreement.

50. By such conduct as described above, the Defendants acted in bad faith and denied

Plaintiff Aronov the benefits o f the Agreement, and thus, breached the covenant o f good faith

and fair dealingwith Plaintiff Aronov.

51. As a direct and proximate result ofthe Defendants' breach ofthe covenant of

good faith and fair dealing,Plaintiff Aronov has suffered damages in an amount to be proven

at trial.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff ARONOV demands judgment againstthe Defendants for:

damages to be determined at trial togetherwith prejudgment and post judgment interests and

costs, and attorneys'
fees,and for such other and further relief as this Court deems justand

proper.

COUNT V
PROMISSORY AND EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL

52. Plaintiff Aronov of paragraphs 1 through 20
hereby incorporatesthe allegations

above as if fullyset forth herein.

9
53. This is an action for promissory and equitableestoppelagainstthe Defendants,

pleaded in the alternative to or in addition to other counts of this First Amended Complaint.

54. For the purposes o f this Count, Plaintiff allegesin the alternative that there was no

applicableContract, Agreement, or contractual provision,or that promises were made outside

of and covering actions by the partiesthat were not covered by any existingcontract

otherwise referred to herein.

55. Defendants made misrepresentations
of material fact regardingthe transfer of the

both the equity of the property and the rental income to the
property and regardingallocating

Plaintiff.

56. Defendants should have reasonablyexpectedto induce action or forbearance on

and in fact did induce action on the part of the Plaintiff in the
the part of the Plaintiff, form of

$1,600,000.00 in payments sent through Timlichman's trust account.

57. Plaintiffrelied on the representations
to his detriment.

58. Plaintiff suffered detriment caused by
significant its reliance on Defendants'

in reliance thereof,as he never received his equity
his change in position
misrepresentations,

in the entity,
Property, or any rental income from the property as agreed.

59. Defendants continue to collect rent payments from the Property and have not

given the Plaintiff any o f the rental income.

60. As a result,Plaintiff has suffered damages.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff ARONOV demands judgment againstthe Defendants for:

damages to be determined at trial togetherwith prejudgment and post judgment interests and

costs, and attorneys'fees,and for such other and further relief as this Court deems justand

proper.

10
COUNT VI
CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST

61. Plaintiff Aronov of paragraphs 1 through 20
hereby incorporatesthe allegations

above as if fullyset forth herein.

62. This is an action to impose a constructive trust againstDefendant Swissa's

interest in the subjectproperty, via his ownership of Defendant Sound's stock. Defendant

Sound is the owner ofrecord ofthe Property.

63. This is an equitableaction as Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law.

64. By virtue o f the Agreement existingbetween the Plaintiff and the De fendants,the

Defendants, through Shimon Swissa, promised,explicitly
or implicitly,
to transfer the

Property to a new entityand allocate Plaintiff an ownership interest in the new entityand an

interest in the rental income from the Property.

65. Plaintiff actively
engaged and assisted Defendants in leasingthe Property to new

tenants, in order to create a revenue stream from rental income.

66. By transferring
the $1,600,000.00 from the Plaintiff to their own accounts without

giving the Plaintiff his due shares,equityor rental income, Defendants wrongfully took

property that,in whole or part, rightfully
belonged to the Plaintiff. Thus, the Defendants have

unjustlyenriched themselves thereby.

67. which are
These egregiousactions have resulted in damage to the Plaintiff,

in nature, as the Defendants have concealed their true intent under the Agreement
irreparable

and have failed to this day to allocate the Plaintiff his due shares,equity,and rental income.

68. Plaintiff seeks to impose a constructive trust on the Property,on a portionof

Defendant's Swiss's stock in Defendant Sound, the new entity,
and all rental income

associated with the Property.

11
69. which
Defendants will be unjustlyenriched by the payments of the Plaintiff,

Defendants' priorpartners'
discharged/recaptured interests in the Property,unless this Court

imposes a constructive trust in favor of the Plaintiff.

70. Equity requiresthat a constructive trust be imposed in favor ofthe Plaintiff.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests this Court, impose a constructive trust on the Property,

a portionof Defendant Swiss's stock in Defendant Sound, the new entity,and all rental

income associated with the Propertytogetherwith prejudgment and post judgment interests

and costs, attorneys'fees,and for such other and further relief as this Court deems justand

proper.

COUNT VII
EQUITABLE LIEN
71. Plaintiff Aronov of paragraphs 1 through 20
hereby incorporatesthe allegations

above as if fullyset forth herein.

72. This is an action to impose an equitablelien againstShimon Swissa's interest in

the subjectproperty, via his ownership of Defendant Swissa's stock in Sound. Defendant

Sound is the owner ofrecord ofthe Property.

73. This is an equitableaction,and the Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law.

74. By virtue o f the Agreement existingbetween the Plaintiff and the De fendants,the

Defendants, through Shimon Swissa, promised,explicitly to transfer the
or implicitly,

Property to a new entityand allocate Plaintiff an ownership interest in the new entityand an

interest in the rental income from the Property.

75. Plaintiff activelyengaged and assisted in leasingthe Property to new tenants to

create a revenue stream from rental income.

12
76. By transferring
the $1,600,000.00 from the Plaintiff to their own accounts without

givingthe Plaintiff his due shares,equityor rental income, Defendants wrongfully took

property that,in whole or part, rightfully
belonged to the Plaintiff. Thus, the Defendants have

unjustlyenriched themselves thereby.

77. which are
These egregiousactions have resulted in damage to the Plaintiff,

irreparablein nature, as the Defendants have concealed their true intent under the Agreement

and have failed to this day to allocate the Plaintiff his due shares,equity,and rental income.

78. Equity requiresthat an equitablelien be imposed in favor of the Plaintiff.

79. At a minimum, Plaintiff seeks to impose an equitablelien on a portionof

Defendant's Swissa's stock in Defendant Sound, the new entity,
the Property and all rental

income associated with the Property.

80. which
Defendants will be unjustlyenriched by the payments of the Plaintiff,

Defendants' priorpartners'
discharged/recaptured interests in the Property,unless this Court

imposes an equitablelien in favor o f the Plaintiff.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests this Court, impose an equitablelien on the Property,on

a portionof Defendant's Swissa's stock in Defendant Sound, the new entity,and all rental

income associated with the Property togetherwith prejudgment and post judgment interests

and costs, fees,and for such other and further relief as
attorneys' this Court deems justand

proper.

COUNT VIII
UNJUST ENRICHMENT

81. Plaintiff Aronov of paragraphs 1 through 20
hereby incorporatesthe allegations

above as if fullyset forth herein.

13
82. At all times material herein,Plaintiff conferred a benefit upon the Defendants in

the form of payments and/or wire transfers totaling
$1,600,000.00.

83. The Defendants voluntarilyaccepted and willfullyretained the $1,600,000.00 but

have egregiouslyfailed to uphold their under the Agreement, i.e.,
obligations to transfer the

Property and allocate Plaintiff his equityand share o f the rental income.

84. As such, it would be inequitablefor the Defendants to retain that $1,600,000.00

without paying back the value thereof,as described in the precedingparagraph,and the other

benefits which Plaintiff was to receive.

85. There is no adequate available legalremedy at law and the Plaintiff has been

damaged as stated
significantly herein.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Aronov demands judgment againstthe Defendants for any and

all damages caused by Defendants' unjustenrichment, includingbut not limited to the

lost rent amounts owed, costs,
fees,if applicable,
$1,600,000.00 alreadytendered, attorneys'

togetherwith any other and further
prejudgment and post judgment interest, relief this Court

deems justand proper.

COUNT IX
TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
86. Plaintiff Aronov of paragraphs 1 through 20
hereby incorporatesthe allegations

above as if fullyset forth herein.

87. This is an action for temporary injunctive
relief, to be made permanent,
thereafter,

preventingthe transfer,re-sale,conveyance or assignmentof any stock,interest or equityin

the Property and of Defendant Sound to a third or subsequent buyer, which is necessary and

appropriatein order to maintain the status harm
quo and prevent irreparable to Plaintiff

Aronov.

14
88. Injunctiverelief is supportedby the attachments made a part of this Amended

Complaint.

89. Injunctiverelief is necessary to preserve the status quo ofthe Property.

90. Plaintiff Aronov has suffered harm through the further
and will suffer irreparable

failures of the Defendants to provide Plaintiff the benefits he was to receive under the

Agreement, especiallyif any portion of the Property is conveyed.

91. Plaintiffhas a clear legalrightto the relief requestedfor the reasons set forth

throughout this Complaint. Plaintiff is likelyto succeed on the merits of his case as the

Defendants have failed to uphold any of their obligations
under the Agreement.

92. Plaintiffhas no adequateremedy at law available to protect and preserve its rights

under the Agreement.

93. An injunctionserves the publicinterest for the reasons set forth throughoutthis

Complaint.

94. Temporary injunctive
relief, to be made permanent, should be issued
thereafter,

by this Court to prevent the transfer,
re-sale,conveyance or assignmentof any stock,interest,

or equity in the Property and of Defendant Sound to a third or subsequent buyer, which is

harm to
necessary and appropriatein order to maintain the status quo and prevent irreparable

Plaintiff Aronov.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests this Court order a temporary injunction, to
thereafter,

be made permanent, preventingthe transfer,re-sale,conveyance or assignment of any stock,

interest,or equityin the Property and of Defendant Sound to a third or subsequentbuyer,

which is necessary and appropriatein order to maintain the status quo, togetherwith

15
and other such further or other relief that
prejudgment and post judgment interest, this Court

may deem justand proper.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Aronov respectfullyrequests that this Court grant all of

Plaintiffs' a constructive
requestedrelief herein, includingestablishing trust in order to transfer/

facilitate the transfer ofthe ownership ofthe Property, specificperformance,

equitablelien,compensatory and consequentialdamages, injunctiverelief,attorneys'fees and

costs, togetherwith prejudgment and post judgment interest,
and other such further or other relief

that this Court may deem justand proper.

Dated: January 31,2022

Respectfullysubmitted,

Greenspoon Marder, LLP MB Law Group, PLLC
Joseph S. Geller,Esq.,Partner 21610 Frontenac Court
200 East Broward Blvd., Suite 1800 Boca Raton, FL 33433
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Tel. (516) 587-3342
Tel. (954) 491-1120
MB@mblaw.group
Joseph.geller@gmlaw.com
Gloria.Donaire@gmlaw.com
By-./s/ Matthew I. Bistritzky
By-- /s/ Joseph Geller, Esq. Matthew I. Bistritzky,
Esq.
Joseph Geller,Esq. FLBar No.:1024661
FL Bar No.: 292771

[BALANCE OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANKI

16
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

WE HEREBY CERTIFY and correct copy of the foregoing First Amended
that a true

Complaint has been e-filed and served on John J. Philips Jr., Esq., at:
Service@johnjphilipspa.comon January 31,2022.

17
, '
I
\ ( j. i 144
/ , R.
U-- -TA

EXHIBIT "A'
511
-,ti gJJ J 3\

CIYC.R)
I,jl..,Ic

17
IO ACKr /87+191.174.Sv?rR

I'-I
Y? -T Fi'1-C.ICC
LD
1

CV hh ILI.CLL
i .Z.n,inJ L

-:. .
-FU-i.-,
I L-
EXHIBIT "A"

71n

---Dzw.BJD 150?-
S1

5Z.USZIHSC C.. .3-1./

--1- .- - -. -
-

Twn 3
JSOK

1
227/7?j=3.

---

Case Info

Judge

Fahnestock, Fabienne E. Track Judge’s New Case

Case No.

(Subscribe to View)

Document Filed Date

January 31, 2022

Case Filing Date

September 03, 2021

County

Parties

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Complaint,Petition: Iskyo Aronov Plaintiff vs. Sound Connection Distributors Inc, et al Defendant

Preview

Case Info

Parties