On October 15, 2019 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Villeda , Jesus,
Villeda , Jhaneth,
and
Citizens Property Insurance Corporation,
for Contract and Indebtedness
in the District Court of Broward County.
Preview
Filing# 137418099 E-Filed 10/27/2021 06:13:47 PM
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE 17TH
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR
BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA
JESUS VILLEDA
CASE NO.: CACE-19-021344
and JHANETH VILLEDA,
Plaintiffs,
V
CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE
CORPORATION,
Defendant.
i
NOTICE OF FILING AFFIDAVIT OF JAVIER MARTIN IN OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs,JESUS VILLEDA and JHANETH VILLEDA, by and through undersigned
attorney, hereby give Notice of FilingAffidavit of Javier Martin in Opposition to Defendant's
Motion for Summary Judgment.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy ofthe foregoingwas served on Counsel
ofRecordfbr Detendant(s)via the Florida E-FilingPortal on this 27 day of October 2021.
YOUR INSURANCE ATTORNEY, PLLC.
Attorneysfor the Plaintiff
2601 S. Bayshore Dr. 18thFloor
Telephone: (305)444-5969
Facsimile: (305)444-1939
Primary Email: YIA20@yourinsuranceattomey.com
Secondary Email:
Eservice@yourinsuranceattorney.com
By: /s/David F. Garcia
David F. Garcia, Esq.
Fla Bar No: 87055
IdelysMartinez, Esq.
Florida Bar No.: 101104
*** FILED: BROWARD COUNTY, FL BRENDA D. FORMAN, CLERK 10/27/2021 06:13:46 PM.****
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE 17TH
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR
BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA
JESUS VILLEDA
CASE NO.: CACE-19-021344
and JHANETH VILLEDA,
Plaintiffs,
V
CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE
CORPORATION,
Defendant.
AFFIDAVIT OF JAVIER MARTIN IN OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
STATE OF FLORIDA
: SS.
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY
:
BEFORE ME, the undersigned notary public,this date appeared JAVIER MARTIN
being personallyknown to me and having taken an oath,deposes and says:
1.
My name is Javier Martin, and I am over the age of 21 and competent to make
this affidavit.
2.
The contents of this affidavit are based on my personalknowledge.
3
I am a licensed publicadjusterin the state of Florida.
4.
I am an independent contractor for Leading Public Adjusters, Inc., a public
adjustingcompany ("LPA").
5.
LPA was retained on behalf of Jesus Villeda and Jhaneth Villeda (the"Insured")
to inspectthe property located at 12708 NW 15th Street,Sunrise,FL 33323 (the"Property")and
prepare an estimate of the damages due to sudden and accidental plumbing loss.
6.
LPA prepared an estimate of the damages. The estimate is attached hereto as
Exhibit "A...
7.
The Estimate attached as Exhibit "A" has been electronically
stored in LPA's
office since it was prepared. It was prepared duringthe ordinarycourse of its business and it is
customary business practiceto retain such documents in its office.
8
I recognizethe Estimate attached as Exhibit "A" because it bears Leading Public
Adjusters'company header and address of the subjectProperty.
9-
I inspectedthe property in connection with the claimed loss and prepared an
estimate on industrystandard software for the total amount of money necessary to restore the
Property to its pre-losscondition. The total amount of my Estimate is $27,438.15. See Exhibit
CC A 57
1-1
.
10.
During the policyperiod,the property suffered a direct and physicalloss when the
plumbing system in the Property failed.
11.
The property suffered direct physicaldamage from the direct exposure of water
dischargefrom the failed plumbing system.
12.
Certain line items in my Estimate are included in order to address the repairs
needed to restore the damage to the property caused directlyby water discharge.
13.
My Estimate also includes certain line items in order to address the estimated cost
to repairand restore damage to the property caused by the tear out and repairof the failed
plumbing system, and which are unrelated to direct physicaldamage by water.
14.
Additionally,the Estimate also includes other line items which are included in
order to preform repairsto the Property that were not directlydamaged by water, but are
included because there are tie-ins that must be considered in order to keep the Property's"lines
of sight"consistent and uniform, as well as the fact that certain damage to abuttingareas cannot
be avoided duringthe repairprocess.
15.
After the loss, the Insured hired Xpress Restoration to provide reasonable
emergency services,pursuant to the Policy,in order to prevent the Property from sustaining
further water damage and mold.
16.
The Policyprovidesseparate mold coverage for $10,000.00.
17.
The insured's actions proved essential in protectingthe property from further
direct damage from water.
18.
There was evidence of mold growth at the Propertyduringmy inspection.
19.
Xpress performed their dry-out/remediationservices to clean out mold at the
property but they did not perform any repairsto the covered property that was damaged by water
as a result of the claimed loss.
20.
The cost of the services provided by Xpress Restoration was $6,364.58.
21.
The entiretyof the cost of Xpress Restoration's water mitigationand restoration
was for services and not for repairof the direct physicaldamage by water.
22.
Therefore,the Insurance Company has not paid the Insured the full amount for the
direct physicalwater damage suffered at the Property.
MMAINDEROFPAGEINTENTIONALLYLEFTBLANKI
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT.
COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE
T
I
JAVIER MARTIN
,
L?
TL
Sworn to and subscribed before me this ct-1
day of October 2021, by Javier Martin
who is personallyknown to me and who did take an oath.
C-
A**?
n
%+9237
ARQA Ie'maaxpfyf.
Cam.#GG910953
(Name ofNotary, typed,printedor stamped)
EM. Sept8,2023
9,F BondedQXRIRANiMCommssionNo.EiC7910953
My Commission expires:
.9/8/2023
Document Filed Date
October 27, 2021
Case Filing Date
October 15, 2019
Category
Contract and Indebtedness
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.