Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
OHMAN VS WELLS FARGO
A 16-Cl >10k <25k Fraud - Civil Limited case was filed by Ohman, Cynthia L, and Ohman, Nathan W, against Wells Fargo Bank Southwest, Na F K A Wachovia Mortgage Fsb F K A World Savings B, in the jurisdiction of Kern County. Judge Etienne, Linda S. presiding.
Case Details
Case Number
Filing Date
April 19, 2010
Last Refreshed
November 20, 2021
Filing Location
Kern County, CA
Category
16-CL >10K <25K Fraud - Civil Limited
Status
Dismissal
Case Duration
7 months and 14 days
Parties
Plaintiffs
Ohman, Cynthia L
Ohman, Nathan W
Defendants
Wells Fargo Bank Southwest, Na F K A Wachovia Mortgage Fsb F K A World Savings B
Case Events
| Date | Type | Description | |
|---|---|---|---|
| December 02, 2010 | hearing |
NP1435 Department: 14 Calendar Notes: NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. THE ABOVE ENTITLED CAUSE CAME ON REGULARLY AT THIS TIME TODAY FOR HEARING WITH PARTIES PRESENT AS FOLLOWS: NATHAN W OHMAN (PL-1) APPEARS IN PROPRIA PERSONA. CYNTHIA L OHMAN (PL-2) APPEARS IN PROPRIA PERSONA. NO APPEARANCE BY ANY OTHER PARTY. *************************************************************************************** CASE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. UPON THE REQUEST OF THE PLAINTIFF'S. |
|
| December 02, 2010 | hearing |
4145 Further Case Management Conference Hearing Entered. Calendar Notes: RE: POS REJECTED TODAY |
|
| December 02, 2010 | hearing |
Further Case Management Conference RE: POS REJECTED TODAY Judge: Etienne, Linda S. |
|
| December 02, 2010 | Docket Event |
Further Case Management Conference RE: POS REJECTED TODAY Judge: Etienne, Linda S. |
|
| December 02, 2010 | Docket Event |
4145 Further Case Management Conference Hearing Entered. Calendar Notes: RE: POS REJECTED TODAY |
|
| December 02, 2010 | Docket Event |
NP1435 Department: 14 Calendar Notes: NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. THE ABOVE ENTITLED CAUSE CAME ON REGULARLY AT THIS TIME TODAY FOR HEARING WITH PARTIES PRESENT AS FOLLOWS: NATHAN W OHMAN (PL-1) APPEARS IN PROPRIA PERSONA. CYNTHIA L OHMAN (PL-2) APPEARS IN PROPRIA PERSONA. NO APPEARANCE BY ANY OTHER PARTY. *************************************************************************************** CASE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. UPON THE REQUEST OF THE PLAINTIFF'S. |
|
| October 18, 2010 | hearing |
NP4170 AND ORDER TO APPEAR RE: SANCTIONS AS TO PLAINTIFF'S FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH RULE 3.110. Department: 14 |
|
| October 18, 2010 | hearing |
NP1430 Department: 14 Calendar Notes: NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN RE DISMISSAL AND ORDER TO APPEAR RE: SANCTIONS AS TO PLAINTIFF'S FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH RULE 3.110. THE ABOVE ENTITLED CAUSE CAME ON REGULARLY AT THIS TIME TODAY FOR HEARING WITH PARTIES PRESENT AS FOLLOWS: NATHAN W OHMAN (PL-1) APPEARS IN PROPRIA PERSONA. CYNTHIA L OHMAN (PL-2) APPEARS IN PROPRIA PERSONA. NO APPEARANCE BY DEFENDANT. *************************************************************************************** MATTER DROPPED AS TO THE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED TODAY. CAUSE IS CONTINUED TO 12/2/2010 AT 8:30 AM IN DIV/DEPT 14 FOR HEARING ON CAL: FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE BEFORE THE HON. Linda S Etienne OR OTHER ASSIGNED JUDICIAL OFFICER. REASON FOR NEXT APPEARANCE: TIME TO RE-SUBMIT CORRECT PROOF OF SERVICE AND RE-SUBMIT. COPY OF MINUTE ORDER MAILED TO PARTIES AS STATED ON THE ATTACHED DECLARATION. 
|
|
| October 18, 2010 | hearing |
Rejection/Correction Notice TO: NATHAN W. OHMAN IN PRO PER 10115 SANTA ANITA LANE BAKERSFIELD, CA 93312 RE: OHMAN VS WELLS FARGO Case No. S-1500-CL-248413, LSE NOTICE OF REJECTION / REQUEST FOR CORRECTIONS _X_ The attached PROOF OF SERVICE RE: WELLS FARGO BANK...ETC. papers are being returned for the following reason(s): __ Your pleadings have been filed; however, this matter will not be calendared for the following reason(s): __ Fee of $___________ required for _____________________. Additional fee of $___________ required. __ Filing fee of $_________________ returned. Check No. ____________________. __ Civil Case Cover Sheet required. __ Signature missing: __ Not an original. Copies not acceptable. __ Acknowledgement of Receipt must be attached to a completed Proof of Service. __ Superior Court case number / Judge's initials: __wrong __missing. __ Does not conform to Rule 2.100 - 2.119 / 3.250 / California Rules of Court. __ Attach proof of Service on opposing party. __ Correct Proof of Service as follows:_____________________________________________________. __ Default cannot be entered. Reason:_____________________________________________________. __ This pleading does not appear to be for Superior Court, Kern County. __ Summons does not conform to Complaint / Cross-Complaint. Page: 1 of 2 NOTICE OF REJECTION / REQUEST FOR CORRECTIONS (continued) RE:OHMAN VS WELLS FARGO Case No. S-1500-CL-248413, LSE __ Not submitted timely under provisions of CCP Section 1005 and California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1300. __ Date you have noticed is a court holiday. __ Hearing must be renoticed for another date: Judge is unavailable from ____________________ to ____________________. Matter will be calendared at time of filing renotice with the court. NO FEE. __ Must be renoticed for ________________ a.m. in Department/Division ____________. __ Answer to Complaint must accompany stipulation to set aside default. __ To dismiss entire action, need joinder of ____________________________________________________. __ Dismissal cannot be entered. Reason: ______________________________________________________. __ Need to submit dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Kern County Local Rule 336(e). __ Consolidated matter: any case numbers to which the dismissal applies must be listed in the body of the document under "other". __ Answer filed: you will be notified of trial date. __ Must file Application for Writ of Possession. __ Does not conform to Kern County Local Rule __________________________________. __ Consolidated matter: all case numbers must be listed in the heading with the lead case. __ Does not conform to California Rules of Court, Rule ____________________________. __ Must use Mandatory Judicial Council form. __ Order page does not contain enough information regarding case; need at least three lines of text with identifying information for order and case (short case title and case number). _X_ Item(s) # 6_is incomplete. Must sepcify party name as shown on documents served. _X_ Other: PROOF OF SERVICE IS DEFECTIVE. #3a. - MUST SPECIFY NAME OF PARTY AS SHOWN ON DOCUMENT SERVED (SEE COMPLAINT). #3b. - IS JANE CURRY AUTHORZIED AGENT FOR SERVICE? IF NOT, MUST LIST NAME OF AUTHORIZED AGENT ON LINE 3b. AND THE NAME AND TITILE OF PERSON ACCEPTING SERVICE ON BEHALF OF AUTHORIZED AGENT ON LINE 5b , THEN THIS WOULD BE DEEMED SUBSTITUTION OF SERVICE IF NOT SERVING AUTHORIZED AGENT AND A DECLARATION OF MAILING ADDRESSED TO AUTHORIZED AGENT WOULD NEED TO BE ATTACHED AS WELL. _______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________. ANY CORRESPONDENCE REQUIRING AN ANSWER FROM THE COURT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A STAMPED, SELF ADDRESSED ENVELOPE. Calendar Notes: TO: NATHAN W. OHMAN IN PRO PER 10115 SANTA ANITA LANE BAKERSFIELD, CA 93312 RE: OHMAN VS WELLS FARGO Case No. S-1500-CL-248413, LSE NOTICE OF REJECTION / REQUEST FOR CORRECTIONS _X_ The attached PROOF OF SERVICE RE: WELLS FARGO BANK...ETC. papers are being returned for the following reason(s): __ Your pleadings have been filed; however, this matter will not be calendared for the following reason(s): __ Fee of $___________ required for _____________________. Additional fee of $___________ required. __ Filing fee of $_________________ returned. Check No. ____________________. __ Civil Case Cover Sheet required. __ Signature missing: __ Not an original. Copies not acceptable. __ Acknowledgement of Receipt must be attached to a completed Proof of Service. __ Superior Court case number / Judge's initials: __wrong __missing. __ Does not conform to Rule 2.100 - 2.119 / 3.250 / California Rules of Court. __ Attach proof of Service on opposing party. __ Correct Proof of Service as follows:_____________________________________________________. __ Default cannot be entered. Reason:_____________________________________________________. __ This pleading does not appear to be for Superior Court, Kern County. __ Summons does not conform to Complaint / Cross-Complaint. Page: 1 of 2 NOTICE OF REJECTION / REQUEST FOR CORRECTIONS (continued) RE:OHMAN VS WELLS FARGO Case No. S-1500-CL-248413, LSE __ Not submitted timely under provisions of CCP Section 1005 and California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1300. __ Date you have noticed is a court holiday. __ Hearing must be renoticed for another date: Judge is unavailable from ____________________ to ____________________. Matter will be calendared at time of filing renotice with the court. NO FEE. __ Must be renoticed for ________________ a.m. in Department/Division ____________. __ Answer to Complaint must accompany stipulation to set aside default. __ To dismiss entire action, need joinder of ____________________________________________________. __ Dismissal cannot be entered. Reason: ______________________________________________________. __ Need to submit dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Kern County Local Rule 336(e). __ Consolidated matter: any case numbers to which the dismissal applies must be listed in the body of the document under "other". __ Answer filed: you will be notified of trial date. __ Must file Application for Writ of Possession. __ Does not conform to Kern County Local Rule __________________________________. __ Consolidated matter: all case numbers must be listed in the heading with the lead case. __ Does not conform to California Rules of Court, Rule ____________________________. __ Must use Mandatory Judicial Council form. __ Order page does not contain enough information regarding case; need at least three lines of text with identifying information for order and case (short case title and case number). _X_ Item(s) # 6_is incomplete. Must sepcify party name as shown on documents served. _X_ Other: PROOF OF SERVICE IS DEFECTIVE. #3a. - MUST SPECIFY NAME OF PARTY AS SHOWN ON DOCUMENT SERVED (SEE COMPLAINT). #3b. - IS JANE CURRY AUTHORZIED AGENT FOR SERVICE? IF NOT, MUST LIST NAME OF AUTHORIZED AGENT ON LINE 3b. AND THE NAME AND TITILE OF PERSON ACCEPTING SERVICE ON BEHALF OF AUTHORIZED AGENT ON LINE 5b , THEN THIS WOULD BE DEEMED SUBSTITUTION OF SERVICE IF NOT SERVING AUTHORIZED AGENT AND A DECLARATION OF MAILING ADDRESSED TO AUTHORIZED AGENT WOULD NEED TO BE ATTACHED AS WELL. _______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________. ANY CORRESPONDENCE REQUIRING AN ANSWER FROM THE COURT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A STAMPED, SELF ADDRESSED ENVELOPE. |
|
| October 18, 2010 | hearing |
4170 Order to Show Cause in re: Dismissal Hearing Entered. Calendar Notes: AND OTA AS TO PLAINTIFF FTC WITH 3.110 SET WITH CMC ON SAME DAY |
|
| October 18, 2010 | hearing |
4156 Case Management Conference (N40u) Hearing Entered. |
|
| October 18, 2010 | hearing |
Order to Show Cause in re: Dismissal AND OTA AS TO PLAINTIFF FTC WITH 3.110 SET WITH CMC ON SAME DAY Judge: Etienne, Linda S. |
|
| October 18, 2010 | hearing |
Case Management Conference
Judge: Etienne, Linda S. |
|
| October 18, 2010 | Docket Event |
NP1430 Department: 14 Calendar Notes: NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN RE DISMISSAL AND ORDER TO APPEAR RE: SANCTIONS AS TO PLAINTIFF'S FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH RULE 3.110. THE ABOVE ENTITLED CAUSE CAME ON REGULARLY AT THIS TIME TODAY FOR HEARING WITH PARTIES PRESENT AS FOLLOWS: NATHAN W OHMAN (PL-1) APPEARS IN PROPRIA PERSONA. CYNTHIA L OHMAN (PL-2) APPEARS IN PROPRIA PERSONA. NO APPEARANCE BY DEFENDANT. *************************************************************************************** MATTER DROPPED AS TO THE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED TODAY. CAUSE IS CONTINUED TO 12/2/2010 AT 8:30 AM IN DIV/DEPT 14 FOR HEARING ON CAL: FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE BEFORE THE HON. Linda S Etienne OR OTHER ASSIGNED JUDICIAL OFFICER. REASON FOR NEXT APPEARANCE: TIME TO RE-SUBMIT CORRECT PROOF OF SERVICE AND RE-SUBMIT. COPY OF MINUTE ORDER MAILED TO PARTIES AS STATED ON THE ATTACHED DECLARATION.
|
|
| October 18, 2010 | Docket Event |
4170 Order to Show Cause in re: Dismissal Hearing Entered. Calendar Notes: AND OTA AS TO PLAINTIFF FTC WITH 3.110 SET WITH CMC ON SAME DAY |
|
| October 18, 2010 | Docket Event |
NP4170 AND ORDER TO APPEAR RE: SANCTIONS AS TO PLAINTIFF'S FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH RULE 3.110. Department: 14 |
|
| October 18, 2010 | Docket Event |
Order to Show Cause in re: Dismissal AND OTA AS TO PLAINTIFF FTC WITH 3.110 SET WITH CMC ON SAME DAY Judge: Etienne, Linda S. |
|
| October 18, 2010 | Docket Event |
4156 Case Management Conference (N40u) Hearing Entered. |
|
| October 18, 2010 | Docket Event |
Rejection/Correction Notice TO: NATHAN W. OHMAN IN PRO PER 10115 SANTA ANITA LANE BAKERSFIELD, CA 93312 RE: OHMAN VS WELLS FARGO Case No. S-1500-CL-248413, LSE NOTICE OF REJECTION / REQUEST FOR CORRECTIONS _X_ The attached PROOF OF SERVICE RE: WELLS FARGO BANK...ETC. papers are being returned for the following reason(s): __ Your pleadings have been filed; however, this matter will not be calendared for the following reason(s): __ Fee of $___________ required for _____________________. Additional fee of $___________ required. __ Filing fee of $_________________ returned. Check No. ____________________. __ Civil Case Cover Sheet required. __ Signature missing: __ Not an original. Copies not acceptable. __ Acknowledgement of Receipt must be attached to a completed Proof of Service. __ Superior Court case number / Judge's initials: __wrong __missing. __ Does not conform to Rule 2.100 - 2.119 / 3.250 / California Rules of Court. __ Attach proof of Service on opposing party. __ Correct Proof of Service as follows:_____________________________________________________. __ Default cannot be entered. Reason:_____________________________________________________. __ This pleading does not appear to be for Superior Court, Kern County. __ Summons does not conform to Complaint / Cross-Complaint. Page: 1 of 2 NOTICE OF REJECTION / REQUEST FOR CORRECTIONS (continued) RE:OHMAN VS WELLS FARGO Case No. S-1500-CL-248413, LSE __ Not submitted timely under provisions of CCP Section 1005 and California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1300. __ Date you have noticed is a court holiday. __ Hearing must be renoticed for another date: Judge is unavailable from ____________________ to ____________________. Matter will be calendared at time of filing renotice with the court. NO FEE. __ Must be renoticed for ________________ a.m. in Department/Division ____________. __ Answer to Complaint must accompany stipulation to set aside default. __ To dismiss entire action, need joinder of ____________________________________________________. __ Dismissal cannot be entered. Reason: ______________________________________________________. __ Need to submit dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Kern County Local Rule 336(e). __ Consolidated matter: any case numbers to which the dismissal applies must be listed in the body of the document under "other". __ Answer filed: you will be notified of trial date. __ Must file Application for Writ of Possession. __ Does not conform to Kern County Local Rule __________________________________. __ Consolidated matter: all case numbers must be listed in the heading with the lead case. __ Does not conform to California Rules of Court, Rule ____________________________. __ Must use Mandatory Judicial Council form. __ Order page does not contain enough information regarding case; need at least three lines of text with identifying information for order and case (short case title and case number). _X_ Item(s) # 6_is incomplete. Must sepcify party name as shown on documents served. _X_ Other: PROOF OF SERVICE IS DEFECTIVE. #3a. - MUST SPECIFY NAME OF PARTY AS SHOWN ON DOCUMENT SERVED (SEE COMPLAINT). #3b. - IS JANE CURRY AUTHORZIED AGENT FOR SERVICE? IF NOT, MUST LIST NAME OF AUTHORIZED AGENT ON LINE 3b. AND THE NAME AND TITILE OF PERSON ACCEPTING SERVICE ON BEHALF OF AUTHORIZED AGENT ON LINE 5b , THEN THIS WOULD BE DEEMED SUBSTITUTION OF SERVICE IF NOT SERVING AUTHORIZED AGENT AND A DECLARATION OF MAILING ADDRESSED TO AUTHORIZED AGENT WOULD NEED TO BE ATTACHED AS WELL. _______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________. ANY CORRESPONDENCE REQUIRING AN ANSWER FROM THE COURT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A STAMPED, SELF ADDRESSED ENVELOPE. Calendar Notes: TO: NATHAN W. OHMAN IN PRO PER 10115 SANTA ANITA LANE BAKERSFIELD, CA 93312 RE: OHMAN VS WELLS FARGO Case No. S-1500-CL-248413, LSE NOTICE OF REJECTION / REQUEST FOR CORRECTIONS _X_ The attached PROOF OF SERVICE RE: WELLS FARGO BANK...ETC. papers are being returned for the following reason(s): __ Your pleadings have been filed; however, this matter will not be calendared for the following reason(s): __ Fee of $___________ required for _____________________. Additional fee of $___________ required. __ Filing fee of $_________________ returned. Check No. ____________________. __ Civil Case Cover Sheet required. __ Signature missing: __ Not an original. Copies not acceptable. __ Acknowledgement of Receipt must be attached to a completed Proof of Service. __ Superior Court case number / Judge's initials: __wrong __missing. __ Does not conform to Rule 2.100 - 2.119 / 3.250 / California Rules of Court. __ Attach proof of Service on opposing party. __ Correct Proof of Service as follows:_____________________________________________________. __ Default cannot be entered. Reason:_____________________________________________________. __ This pleading does not appear to be for Superior Court, Kern County. __ Summons does not conform to Complaint / Cross-Complaint. Page: 1 of 2 NOTICE OF REJECTION / REQUEST FOR CORRECTIONS (continued) RE:OHMAN VS WELLS FARGO Case No. S-1500-CL-248413, LSE __ Not submitted timely under provisions of CCP Section 1005 and California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1300. __ Date you have noticed is a court holiday. __ Hearing must be renoticed for another date: Judge is unavailable from ____________________ to ____________________. Matter will be calendared at time of filing renotice with the court. NO FEE. __ Must be renoticed for ________________ a.m. in Department/Division ____________. __ Answer to Complaint must accompany stipulation to set aside default. __ To dismiss entire action, need joinder of ____________________________________________________. __ Dismissal cannot be entered. Reason: ______________________________________________________. __ Need to submit dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Kern County Local Rule 336(e). __ Consolidated matter: any case numbers to which the dismissal applies must be listed in the body of the document under "other". __ Answer filed: you will be notified of trial date. __ Must file Application for Writ of Possession. __ Does not conform to Kern County Local Rule __________________________________. __ Consolidated matter: all case numbers must be listed in the heading with the lead case. __ Does not conform to California Rules of Court, Rule ____________________________. __ Must use Mandatory Judicial Council form. __ Order page does not contain enough information regarding case; need at least three lines of text with identifying information for order and case (short case title and case number). _X_ Item(s) # 6_is incomplete. Must sepcify party name as shown on documents served. _X_ Other: PROOF OF SERVICE IS DEFECTIVE. #3a. - MUST SPECIFY NAME OF PARTY AS SHOWN ON DOCUMENT SERVED (SEE COMPLAINT). #3b. - IS JANE CURRY AUTHORZIED AGENT FOR SERVICE? IF NOT, MUST LIST NAME OF AUTHORIZED AGENT ON LINE 3b. AND THE NAME AND TITILE OF PERSON ACCEPTING SERVICE ON BEHALF OF AUTHORIZED AGENT ON LINE 5b , THEN THIS WOULD BE DEEMED SUBSTITUTION OF SERVICE IF NOT SERVING AUTHORIZED AGENT AND A DECLARATION OF MAILING ADDRESSED TO AUTHORIZED AGENT WOULD NEED TO BE ATTACHED AS WELL. _______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________. ANY CORRESPONDENCE REQUIRING AN ANSWER FROM THE COURT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A STAMPED, SELF ADDRESSED ENVELOPE. |
|
| September 23, 2010 | hearing |
NP4170 AND ORDER TO APPEAR RE: SANCTIONS AS TO PLAINTIFF FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH RULE 3.110. Department: 14 Calendar Notes: NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN RE DISMISSAL AND ORDER TO APPEAR RE: SANCTIONS AS TO PLAINTIFF FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH RULE 3.110. THE ABOVE ENTITLED CAUSE CAME ON REGULARLY AT THIS TIME TODAY FOR HEARING WITH PARTIES PRESENT AS FOLLOWS: NATHAN W OHMAN (PL-1) APPEARS IN PROPRIA PERSONA. CYNTHIA L OHMAN (PL-2) APPEARS IN PROPRIA PERSONA. NO APPEARANCE BY DEFENDANT. *************************************************************************************** CAUSE IS CONTINUED TO 10/18/2010 AT 8:30 AM IN DIV/DEPT 14 FOR HEARING ON CAL: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN RE DISMISSAL BEFORE THE HON. Linda S Etienne OR OTHER ASSIGNED JUDICIAL OFFICER. REASON FOR NEXT APPEARANCE: ATTEMPTING SERVICE ON AMENDED COMPLAINT. COPY OF MINUTE ORDER MAILED TO PARTIES AS STATED ON THE ATTACHED DECLARATION.
|
|
| September 23, 2010 | hearing |
4170 Order to Show Cause in re: Dismissal Hearing Entered. Calendar Notes: AND OTA AS TO PLAINTIFF'S FTC WITH 3.110 |
|
| September 23, 2010 | hearing |
Order to Show Cause in re: Dismissal AND OTA AS TO PLAINTIFF'S FTC WITH 3.110 Judge: Etienne, Linda S. |
|
| September 23, 2010 | Docket Event |
Order to Show Cause in re: Dismissal AND OTA AS TO PLAINTIFF'S FTC WITH 3.110 Judge: Etienne, Linda S. |
|
| September 23, 2010 | Docket Event |
NP4170 AND ORDER TO APPEAR RE: SANCTIONS AS TO PLAINTIFF FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH RULE 3.110. Department: 14 Calendar Notes: NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN RE DISMISSAL AND ORDER TO APPEAR RE: SANCTIONS AS TO PLAINTIFF FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH RULE 3.110. THE ABOVE ENTITLED CAUSE CAME ON REGULARLY AT THIS TIME TODAY FOR HEARING WITH PARTIES PRESENT AS FOLLOWS: NATHAN W OHMAN (PL-1) APPEARS IN PROPRIA PERSONA. CYNTHIA L OHMAN (PL-2) APPEARS IN PROPRIA PERSONA. NO APPEARANCE BY DEFENDANT. *************************************************************************************** CAUSE IS CONTINUED TO 10/18/2010 AT 8:30 AM IN DIV/DEPT 14 FOR HEARING ON CAL: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN RE DISMISSAL BEFORE THE HON. Linda S Etienne OR OTHER ASSIGNED JUDICIAL OFFICER. REASON FOR NEXT APPEARANCE: ATTEMPTING SERVICE ON AMENDED COMPLAINT. COPY OF MINUTE ORDER MAILED TO PARTIES AS STATED ON THE ATTACHED DECLARATION.
|
|
| September 23, 2010 | Docket Event |
4170 Order to Show Cause in re: Dismissal Hearing Entered. Calendar Notes: AND OTA AS TO PLAINTIFF'S FTC WITH 3.110 |
|
| September 08, 2010 | hearing |
153 Pmt: Civil Sanctions CCP 128 & 128.5 Amount of $250.00 for OHMAN, NATHAN W (PL-1). Received from NATHAN CYNTHIA OHMAN, check no(s) 1221. Receipt #546470 for amount of $250.00. |
|
| September 08, 2010 | hearing |
Summons Issued and Filed ON FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED BY NATHAN W OHMAN AND CYNTHIA L OHMAN, BOTH IN PRO PER |
|
| September 08, 2010 | hearing |
First Amended Complaint DEFTS: WELLS FARGO BANK SOUTHWEST, NA F/K/A WACHOVIA MORTGAGE FSB F/K/A/ WORLD SAVINGS BANK FSB; DOES 1 TO 10 INCLUSIVE FILED BY NATHAN W OHMAN AND CYNTHIA L OHMAN, BOTH IN PRO PER |
|
| September 08, 2010 | Docket Event |
Summons Issued and Filed ON FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED BY NATHAN W OHMAN AND CYNTHIA L OHMAN, BOTH IN PRO PER |
|
| September 08, 2010 | Docket Event |
153 Pmt: Civil Sanctions CCP 128 & 128.5 Amount of $250.00 for OHMAN, NATHAN W (PL-1). Received from NATHAN CYNTHIA OHMAN, check no(s) 1221. Receipt #546470 for amount of $250.00. |
|
| September 08, 2010 | Docket Event |
First Amended Complaint DEFTS: WELLS FARGO BANK SOUTHWEST, NA F/K/A WACHOVIA MORTGAGE FSB F/K/A/ WORLD SAVINGS BANK FSB; DOES 1 TO 10 INCLUSIVE FILED BY NATHAN W OHMAN AND CYNTHIA L OHMAN, BOTH IN PRO PER |
|
| August 02, 2010 | hearing |
NP1511 Department: 14 Calendar Notes: NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: AUTO NOTICE PURSUANT TO CRC 3.110. THE ABOVE ENTITLED CAUSE CAME ON REGULARLY AT THIS TIME TODAY FOR HEARING WITH PARTIES PRESENT AS FOLLOWS: NO APPEARANCE BY PLAINTIFF'S. NO APPEARANCE BY DEFENDANT. *************************************************************************************** SANCTIONS IMPOSED ON PLAINTIFF'S IN THE AMOUNT OF $250.00 TO BE PAID BY /STAYED (30) DAYS (UNTIL 09/01/10) IF IN COMPLIANCE SANCTIONS WAIVED IF NOT DUE AND PAYABLE ON 09/02/10. COURT SETS THIS MATTER FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL AND AN ORDER TO APPEAR RE: SANCTIONS AS TO PLAINTIFF'S, FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH RULE(S) 3.110. HEARING SET 9/23/2010 AT 08:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT 14. NOTICE TO ISSUE FROM THE COURT. |
|
| August 02, 2010 | hearing |
4159 Order to Show Cause - (N20a - CRC 3.110) Hearing Entered. |
|
| August 02, 2010 | hearing |
Order to Show Cause - CRC 3.110
Judge: Etienne, Linda S. |
|
| August 02, 2010 | Docket Event |
NP1511 Department: 14 Calendar Notes: NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: AUTO NOTICE PURSUANT TO CRC 3.110. THE ABOVE ENTITLED CAUSE CAME ON REGULARLY AT THIS TIME TODAY FOR HEARING WITH PARTIES PRESENT AS FOLLOWS: NO APPEARANCE BY PLAINTIFF'S. NO APPEARANCE BY DEFENDANT. *************************************************************************************** SANCTIONS IMPOSED ON PLAINTIFF'S IN THE AMOUNT OF $250.00 TO BE PAID BY /STAYED (30) DAYS (UNTIL 09/01/10) IF IN COMPLIANCE SANCTIONS WAIVED IF NOT DUE AND PAYABLE ON 09/02/10. COURT SETS THIS MATTER FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL AND AN ORDER TO APPEAR RE: SANCTIONS AS TO PLAINTIFF'S, FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH RULE(S) 3.110. HEARING SET 9/23/2010 AT 08:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT 14. NOTICE TO ISSUE FROM THE COURT. |
|
| August 02, 2010 | Docket Event |
4159 Order to Show Cause - (N20a - CRC 3.110) Hearing Entered. |
|
| April 27, 2010 | hearing |
844J Pmt: Ltd Civil Complaint > $10,000 GC 70613(A) (7/28/09 Amount of $330.00 for OHMAN, NATHAN W (PL-1). Received from NATHAN CYNTHIA OHMAN, check no(s) 1158. Receipt #520045 for amount of $330.00. |
|
| April 27, 2010 | Docket Event |
844J Pmt: Ltd Civil Complaint > $10,000 GC 70613(A) (7/28/09 Amount of $330.00 for OHMAN, NATHAN W (PL-1). Received from NATHAN CYNTHIA OHMAN, check no(s) 1158. Receipt #520045 for amount of $330.00. |
|
| April 22, 2010 | hearing |
Rejection/Correction Notice Summons DOES NOT CONFORM TO COMPLAINT |
|
| April 22, 2010 | hearing |
Order to Show Cause NOTICE OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE 3.110 TO PLAINTIFF AND PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL: YOU ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR ON Aug 02, 2010 AT 8:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT_14 OF THE ABOVE ENTITLED COURT TO GIVE ANY LEGAL REASON WHY SANCTIONS SHALL NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO SERVE THE COMPLAINT ON ALL NAMED DEFENDANTS AND FILE PROOF(S) OF SERVICE WITH THE COURT WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS AFTER THE FILING OF THE COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE 3.110. ALL APPEARANCES ARE MANDATORY, UNLESS FIVE (5) COURT DAYS PRIOR TO HEARING DATE THE COURT HAS RECEIVED THE REQUIRED PROOF(S) OF SERVICE, THEN NO APPEARANCE IS NECESSARY. Calendar Notes: NOTICE OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE 3.110 TO PLAINTIFF AND PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL: YOU ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR ON Aug 02, 2010 AT 8:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT_14 OF THE ABOVE ENTITLED COURT TO GIVE ANY LEGAL REASON WHY SANCTIONS SHALL NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO SERVE THE COMPLAINT ON ALL NAMED DEFENDANTS AND FILE PROOF(S) OF SERVICE WITH THE COURT WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS AFTER THE FILING OF THE COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE 3.110. ALL APPEARANCES ARE MANDATORY, UNLESS FIVE (5) COURT DAYS PRIOR TO HEARING DATE THE COURT HAS RECEIVED THE REQUIRED PROOF(S) OF SERVICE, THEN NO APPEARANCE IS NECESSARY. |
|
| April 22, 2010 | hearing |
NOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO EACH PARTY AND THE ATTORNEY OF RECORD FOR EACH PARTY IN THIS ACTION: THIS CASE IS SET FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE BY THE HONORABLE Linda S Etienne, ON Oct 18, 2010 AT 8:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT 14, OF THIS SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF KERN. APPEARANCE BY THE ATTORNEY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TRIAL OF THIS ACTION IS MANDATORY. NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL IMPORTANT: You are required to serve this Notice of Case Management Conference date with the service of the Summons, Complaint (Local Rule 3.8 (a)), Civil Mediation Information Brochure, and ADR Stipulation and Order Form. [CRC, Rule 3.221] NOTICE TO CROSS COMPLAINANT'S COUNSEL IMPORTANT: If you are bringing a cross complaint against new parties, you are, likewise, required to serve this Notice of Case Management Conference date on the new cross defendants. Calendar Notes: NOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO EACH PARTY AND THE ATTORNEY OF RECORD FOR EACH PARTY IN THIS ACTION: THIS CASE IS SET FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE BY THE HONORABLE Linda S Etienne, ON Oct 18, 2010 AT 8:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT 14, OF THIS SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF KERN. APPEARANCE BY THE ATTORNEY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TRIAL OF THIS ACTION IS MANDATORY. NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL IMPORTANT: You are required to serve this Notice of Case Management Conference date with the service of the Summons, Complaint (Local Rule 3.8 (a)), Civil Mediation Information Brochure, and ADR Stipulation and Order Form. [CRC, Rule 3.221] NOTICE TO CROSS COMPLAINANT'S COUNSEL IMPORTANT: If you are bringing a cross complaint against new parties, you are, likewise, required to serve this Notice of Case Management Conference date on the new cross defendants.
|
|
| April 22, 2010 | hearing |
CONV New case created by deputy: 432 |
|
| April 22, 2010 | Docket Event |
CONV New case created by deputy: 432 |
|
| April 22, 2010 | Docket Event |
Order to Show Cause NOTICE OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE 3.110 TO PLAINTIFF AND PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL: YOU ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR ON Aug 02, 2010 AT 8:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT_14 OF THE ABOVE ENTITLED COURT TO GIVE ANY LEGAL REASON WHY SANCTIONS SHALL NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO SERVE THE COMPLAINT ON ALL NAMED DEFENDANTS AND FILE PROOF(S) OF SERVICE WITH THE COURT WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS AFTER THE FILING OF THE COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE 3.110. ALL APPEARANCES ARE MANDATORY, UNLESS FIVE (5) COURT DAYS PRIOR TO HEARING DATE THE COURT HAS RECEIVED THE REQUIRED PROOF(S) OF SERVICE, THEN NO APPEARANCE IS NECESSARY. Calendar Notes: NOTICE OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE 3.110 TO PLAINTIFF AND PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL: YOU ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR ON Aug 02, 2010 AT 8:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT_14 OF THE ABOVE ENTITLED COURT TO GIVE ANY LEGAL REASON WHY SANCTIONS SHALL NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO SERVE THE COMPLAINT ON ALL NAMED DEFENDANTS AND FILE PROOF(S) OF SERVICE WITH THE COURT WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS AFTER THE FILING OF THE COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE 3.110. ALL APPEARANCES ARE MANDATORY, UNLESS FIVE (5) COURT DAYS PRIOR TO HEARING DATE THE COURT HAS RECEIVED THE REQUIRED PROOF(S) OF SERVICE, THEN NO APPEARANCE IS NECESSARY. |
|
| April 22, 2010 | Docket Event |
Rejection/Correction Notice Summons DOES NOT CONFORM TO COMPLAINT |
|
| April 22, 2010 | Docket Event |
NOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO EACH PARTY AND THE ATTORNEY OF RECORD FOR EACH PARTY IN THIS ACTION: THIS CASE IS SET FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE BY THE HONORABLE Linda S Etienne, ON Oct 18, 2010 AT 8:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT 14, OF THIS SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF KERN. APPEARANCE BY THE ATTORNEY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TRIAL OF THIS ACTION IS MANDATORY. NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL IMPORTANT: You are required to serve this Notice of Case Management Conference date with the service of the Summons, Complaint (Local Rule 3.8 (a)), Civil Mediation Information Brochure, and ADR Stipulation and Order Form. [CRC, Rule 3.221] NOTICE TO CROSS COMPLAINANT'S COUNSEL IMPORTANT: If you are bringing a cross complaint against new parties, you are, likewise, required to serve this Notice of Case Management Conference date on the new cross defendants. Calendar Notes: NOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO EACH PARTY AND THE ATTORNEY OF RECORD FOR EACH PARTY IN THIS ACTION: THIS CASE IS SET FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE BY THE HONORABLE Linda S Etienne, ON Oct 18, 2010 AT 8:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT 14, OF THIS SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF KERN. APPEARANCE BY THE ATTORNEY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TRIAL OF THIS ACTION IS MANDATORY. NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL IMPORTANT: You are required to serve this Notice of Case Management Conference date with the service of the Summons, Complaint (Local Rule 3.8 (a)), Civil Mediation Information Brochure, and ADR Stipulation and Order Form. [CRC, Rule 3.221] NOTICE TO CROSS COMPLAINANT'S COUNSEL IMPORTANT: If you are bringing a cross complaint against new parties, you are, likewise, required to serve this Notice of Case Management Conference date on the new cross defendants.
|
|
| April 19, 2010 | hearing |
Complaint IN PRO PER |
|
| April 19, 2010 | Docket Event |
Complaint IN PRO PER |
