Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
Accommodations Plus International, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Accommodations Plus, Inc. v. Thomas Grupp, Hotel Connections, Ltd.
On December 06, 2012 a commercial case was filed by (Subcribe to view) represented by (Subcribe to view) against (Subscribe to view) represented by (Subscribe to view) in the jurisdiction of Suffolk County. Judge Emily Pines presiding.
Case Details
Case Number
Filing Date
December 06, 2012
Last Refreshed
July 21, 2023
Filing Location
Suffolk County, NY
Filing Court House
Suffolk County Supreme Court
Category
Commercial
Practice Area
Commercial
Matter Type
General Commercial
Case Outcome Type
Disposed
Status
Closed
Case Duration
8 months and 21 days
Overview
API’s Business
API is a successful, full-service travel management company that provides crew
accommodation services to the airline and transportation industries.
API was founded in 1984 to deliver cost-effective crew accommodations to the
airline industry.
Today, API provides hotel sourcing, corporate travel services and other travel
management services to more than forty (40) international and domestic airline and
transportation clients.
Two of APT’s most important assets are its strong relationships with its clients and
the innovative technological tools with which it provides an exceptional layover experience for
its clients.
API tirelessly serves its clients around the clock via its account staff and 24/7
Operations Center. API has spent countless personnel hours forging relationships with its
clients. API has invested an untold amount of resources in providing the highest level of service
to its clients, soliciting their feedback, and improving its systems — all so that API can maintain
the trusting client relationships and client goodwill that it has worked years to develop.
In addition to developing personal relationship with clients, API utilizes a number
of proprietary systems to manage client accounts and serve its clients at the highest level. It is
API’s technological advancement that permits it to provide unparalleled service to its clients and
to retain those clients.
API operates an automated online booking engine called HotelExpress, which isstaffed by professional reservations agents and provides clients with access to API's specially-
negotiated rates at more than seventy thousand (70,000) hotels worldwide.
HotelExpress is just one of the proprietary systems developed and utilized by API
in its business. HotelExpress gives API an advantage over its competitors by providing clients
with a convenient means of booking travel online at real-time discounted rates negotiated by
API. HotelExpress stores clients’ prearranged preferences and provides them the assurance of
instant booking confirmation. API's proprietary technology makes these features possible.
API also provides its clients access to its proprietary CrewCare system, an online
tool that is designed so that airline crews can easily access their accommodation information
while they are away from base. Airline crews are provided hotel and local area information,
available benefits and special concessions, as well as online leisure travel booking at specially-
negotiated rates. CrewCare enables airline management to track, manage and report feedback on
accommodations in real time. The CrewCare system is supervised by an API account manager
and is another of API’s proprietary client service tools.
API also utilizes the ACES system, an automated proprietary tool that provides
API’s clients with a full range of crew accommodations. ACES creates monthly hotel and
transportation schedules by pairing optimizers or bidding systems, posting them to secure
supplier websites, and ensuring supplier review and confirmation. ACES also permits day of
operations changes in a manner that ensures crews are always protected. ACES also provides
clients with fully-integrated invoices and general ledger accounting while ensuring that clients
obtain maximum savings and compliance with applicable provisions of Sarbanes Oxley.
Grupp’s Employment with API
On or about May 7, 2008, API hired Grupp as its Account Director.17. As the Account Director for API, Grupp was directly responsible for contracts
with clients on behalf of API, from the initial request for proposal through the drafting,
negotiation, execution and renewal of contracts.
Grupp was also responsible for building and maintaining strategic alliances with
clients by collecting pricing information from hotels, reviewing information and making
informed recommendations for clients and managing client complaints and concerns.
Grupp was also responsible for sourcing and procuring vendor relationships
worldwide. Grupp conducted hotel site inspections with clients in order to check for quality and
safety. In addition, he managed budgets and supply chains.
In the course of his employment, Grupp was also responsible for conducting
internal market research for API. Grupp compiled worldwide pricing trend information for API
and its clients in order to ascertain the state of the market.
In connection with his employment with API, Grupp was granted unfettered
access to API's client information, including detailed client contact information and detailed
information regarding client preferences and needs. Such information would not be publicly
available and had been developed by API over time and through a great expenditure of resources,
Grupp had regular, intensive contact with API’s clients. As the Account
Manager, he was integral to API’s efforts to establish relationships with new and potential clients
and to maintain existing client relationships. The relationships Grupp established with clients on
behalf of API were made possible by API’s decades of extensive work in the industry and API's
substantial investment of company resources in client development and technology.
In connection with his employment with API, Grupp was also granted unfettered
access to API’s proprietary technology systems, including HotelExpress, CrewCare and ACES.Grupp needed access to these systems in order to explain API’s services to prospective clients
and to address the ongoing concerns of API’s existing clients.
Grupp acquired more than a passing familiarity with API’s proprietary
technology during the course of his employment. He acquired extensive confidential
information regarding the particular technical specifications of API’s proprietary systems and the
mechanisms by which API achieves its industry-leading programs.
The Confidential Information and Competitive Activity Agreement
In connection with his employment, Grupp executed a Confidential Information
and Competitive Activity Agreement (the “Agreement”). (See Agreement, annexed hereto as
Exhibit A.)
Inthe Agreement, Grupp acknowledged that he would have access to API’s
Confidential Information, defined as:
financial, organizational and operational information, pricing
information, contractual relationships, investor and client
information, information relating to the performance of any API
account, and any other information that could reasonably be expected
to prove harmful to API or any API-related entity, including without
limitation, any information that could reasonably be expected to aid
a competitor or potential competitor, but shall not include information
generally available to be public.
Grupp further agreed not to disclose any Confidential Information during his employment or at
any time thereafter without the express written consent of API, and agreed not to “copy, transmit,
reproduce, summarize, quote or make any commercial or other use whatsoever of Confidential
Information.”
Inthe Agreement Grupp agreed to a reasonable, limited restriction on his
employment activity for one (1) year following the termination of his employment with API.Pursuant to the Agreement, Grupp agreed not to “[p]erform travel management services provided
by API or any of its affiliated entities for a travel management company which competes with
API.”
Grupp also agreed not to “[i]nterfere with or induce any existing airline Client to
discontinue any business relationship with API or its affiliated entities” for one (1) year
following the termination of his employment with API.
Because of the intensive client-contact involved in Grupp’s employment with API
and the extensive nature of his knowledge of API’s Confidential Information, Grupp
acknowledged that any violation of the Agreement would constitute irreparable harm to API for
which there is no adequate remedy at law.
In the Agreement, AP] is entitled to “an injunction, restraining order or other
equitable relief in favor of API, without the necessity of posting a bond, restraining you [Grupp]
from committing or continuing to commit any such violation” without waiving API's right to any
other remedy API may have at law or equity.
31, On or about July 3. 2012, Grupp was terminated ftom his employment with API.
Hotel Connections
Shortly after Grupp was terminated, AP] learned that he was in violation of the
Agreement in several respects.
Grupp pursued positions with API’s direct competitors. Grupp applied for
positions with API's direct competitors based on his extensive client contacts and the in-depth
Confidential Information that he obtained while working at API.
Upon information and belief, in the course of applying for employment with
API's direct competitors, Grupp made unauthorized disclosures of API’s ConfidentialInformation.
| Grupp applied for a position with Hotel Connections, a travel management
company that is a direct competitor with API.
On or about August 7, 2012, counsel for API advised Hotel Connections that
Grupp was restricted by the Agreement and detailed the relevant terms thereof.
After August 7, 2012, Hotel Connections was on notice that Grupp was prohibited
by the terms of the Agreement from disclosing API’s proprietary and Confidential Information,
from performing travel management services in direct competition with API for one year, and
from inducing API’s existing clients to discontinue their relationship with API.
Upon information and belief, Grupp pursued a position with Hotel Connections
based on representations that he would convince API’s clients to discontinue their relationship
with API and to establish a relationship with Hotel Connections.
39, Upon information and belief, Grupp pursued a position with Hotel Connections
based on representations that he would provide Hotel Connections with API’s proprietary and
Confidential Information, thereby giving Hotel Connections a competitive edge against API.
Upon information and belief, and despite being advised of the restrictions on
Grupp’s employment, Hotel Connections hired Grupp.
Upon information and belief, Grupp is now employed by Hotel Connections and
continues to be in violation of the Agreement by disclosing API’s Confidential Information,
performing travel management services in direct competition with API, and attempting to induce
APIs existing clients to discontinue their relationship with API.
Upon information and belief, Grupp has already divulged to Hotel Connections
significant proprietary and Confidential Information, including but not limited to proprietary andconfidential client information belonging to API.
Upon information and belief, Grupp has already used the proprietary and
Confidential Information from API to induce existing customers of API to discontinue their
relationships with API and to do business with Hotel Connections instead.
Hotel Connections’ employment of Grupp has already resulted in significant,
irreparable breaches of the Agreement which can only be cured by the discontinuance of the
employer-employee relationship between Hotel Connections and Grupp.
Causes of Action
Facts Common to All Causes of Action
1. FOR A PRELIMINARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST GRUPP
AS. AND FOR A SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION FOR A PRELIMINARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST GRUPP
3. FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT AGAINST GRUPP
4. FOR A MISAPPROPRIATION OF TRADE SECRETS AGAINST GRUPP
5. FOR A PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST HOTEL CONNECTIONS
6. FOR TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE WITH CONTRACT AGAINST HOTEL CONNECTIONS
Parties
Plaintiffs
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Defendants
Attorneys for Defendants
Case Documents
STIPULATION - DISCONTINUANCE (POST RJI)
Date: Aug 28, 2013DECISION ORDER ON MOTION (Motion 001)
Date: Aug 19, 2013STIPULATION - ADJOURNMENT OF MOTION (Motion 001)
Date: Mar 06, 2013MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT (Motion 001)
Date: Feb 08, 2013NOTICE OF MOTION (Motion 001)
Date: Feb 08, 2013AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIRMATION IN SUPPORT OF MOTION (Motion 001)
Date: Feb 08, 2013ANSWER
Date: Feb 07, 2013STIPULATION - OTHER
Date: Feb 01, 2013STIPULATION - OTHER
Date: Jan 15, 2013SUMMONS COMPLAINT
Date: Dec 06, 2012Case Events
Date | Type | Description | |
---|---|---|---|
September 03, 2013 | hearing |
OTHER FINAL DISP-PRE NOTE PRELIMINARY CONF PART 46 STD 8/28/13 EFILED 8/28/13 Judge: EMILY PINES/COMM |
|
August 28, 2013 | Docket Event | STIPULATION - DISCONTINUANCE (POST RJI) | |
August 19, 2013 | Docket Event | DECISION + ORDER ON MOTION (Motion #001) | |
May 28, 2013 | hearing |
FULLY SUBMITTED (Motion #001) MOTION PART 46 Judge: EMILY PINES/COMM |
|
April 23, 2013 | hearing |
ADJOURNED (Motion #001) MOTION PART 46 Judge: EMILY PINES/COMM |
|
March 19, 2013 | hearing |
ADJOURNED (Motion #001) MOTION PART 46 PIP 3/13/13 Judge: EMILY PINES/COMM |
|
March 08, 2013 | hearing |
ADJOURNED (Motion #001) MOTION PART 46 Judge: EMILY PINES/COMM |
|
March 06, 2013 | Docket Event |
STIPULATION - ADJOURNMENT OF MOTION (Motion #001) Stipulation to Adjourn Motion to Dismiss to 3/29/13. |
|
February 14, 2013 | Motion |
DISMISSAL (Motion #001) Decided: 08/14/2013MOTION GRANTED Before Justice: EMILY PINES/COMM Answer demanded: No Judge: EMILY PINES/COMM |
|
February 08, 2013 | Docket Event |
MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT (Motion #001) Memorandum of Law in Support |
|
February 08, 2013 | Docket Event |
NOTICE OF MOTION (Motion #001) Notice of Motion to Dismiss |
|
February 08, 2013 | Docket Event |
AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIRMATION IN SUPPORT OF MOTION (Motion #001) Affirmation in Support of Motion |
|
February 08, 2013 | Docket Event |
EXHIBIT(S) - B (Motion #001) B - Affidavit in Support of Motion to Dismiss |
|
February 08, 2013 | Docket Event |
EXHIBIT(S) - A (Motion #001) A - Complaint (with Agreement) |
|
February 08, 2013 | Docket Event |
RJI -RE: OTHER(SPECIFY IN DESCRIPTION AREA) RJI - Commercial Division - Motion to Dismiss |
|
February 07, 2013 | Docket Event | ANSWER | |
February 01, 2013 | Docket Event |
STIPULATION - OTHER Stipulation Extending Time to File A Responsive Pleading |
|
January 15, 2013 | Docket Event | STIPULATION - OTHER | |
January 03, 2013 | Docket Event |
AFFIRMATION/AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE Affidavit of Service on Thomas Grupp |
|
January 03, 2013 | Docket Event |
AFFIRMATION/AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE Affidavit of Service on Hotel Connections Ltd. |
|
January 03, 2013 | Docket Event |
EXHIBIT(S) - A Exhibit A to Verified Complaint |
|
December 06, 2012 | Docket Event |
SUMMONS + COMPLAINT Summons and Verified Complaint |