Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
Thu Dang vs Gerardo Lopez- DISMISSED
A Dissolution - Minor Children case was filed by Dang, Thu Bich, against Lopez, Gerardo C, in the jurisdiction of Fresno County. Judge Kalemkarian, David presiding.
Case Details
Case Number
Filing Date
December 05, 2017
Last Refreshed
February 21, 2021
Filing Location
Fresno County, CA
Category
Dissolution - Minor Children
Practice Area
Family
Matter Type
Divorce,Separation
Case Outcome Type
Judgment
Status
Dismissal
Case Duration
1 year, 4 months and 4 days
Parties
Plaintiffs
Dang, Thu Bich
Defendants
Lopez, Gerardo C
Other Parties
Lopez, Jason Fernando
(Minor)
Case Events
| Date | Type | Description | |
|---|---|---|---|
| April 12, 2019 | Docket Event | Clerk's Certificate of Mailing | |
| April 10, 2019 | Docket Event |
Judge Kalemkarian Minute Order. See Attached Time: 11:00 a.m. Dept: 202 Clerk: L. Garvin Reporter: NR Petitioner not present Respondent not present Hearing Type: Other: Dismissal Hearing No appearance by either party Other: Good cause has not been shown as to why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute (CRC Rule 5.83(c) (4)). Accordingly, the case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. |
|
| April 10, 2019 | Docket Event |
Dismissal Hearing
Judge:
Kalemkarian, David
|
|
| January 22, 2019 | Docket Event |
Judge Kalemkarian Minute Order. See Attached Dept: 202 Clerk: L Garvin Bailiff: A. Rivera Petitioner not present Respondent not present Continued to: Other: You are hereby ordered to appear in Department 202 on 4/10/2019 at 11:00 a.m., to show cause why the above-referenced case should not be dismissed. Other: California law requires that Family Law matters proceed in an effective and timely manner from initial filing to final disposition. (Fam. Code 2450, subd. (a), and Standards of Judicial Administration, standard 5.30.) In deciding whether a case is progressing in an effective and timely manner, the Court considers procedural milestones, including the following: (A) A proof of service of summons and petition should be filed within 60 days of case initiation; (B) If no response has been filed, and the parties have not agreed on an extension of time to respond, a request to enter default should be submitted within 60 days after the date the response was due; (C) The petitioner's preliminary declaration of disclosure should be served within 60 days of the filing of the petition; (D) When a default has been entered, a judgment should be submitted within 60 days of the entry of default; (E) Whether a trial date has been requested or scheduled; and (F) When the parties have notified the court that they are actively negotiating or mediating their case, a written agreement for judgment is submitted within six months of the date the petition was filed, or a request for trial date is submitted. (Cal. Rule of Court, rule 5.83(c) (4).) The Court has reason to believe that the above-referenced case is not progressing in an effective and timely manner. |
|
| January 22, 2019 | Docket Event |
1 Family - Centered Status Conference
Judge:
Kalemkarian, David
|
|
| May 01, 2018 | Docket Event |
Reissuance of OSC SS
Judge:
Kalemkarian, David
|
|
| May 01, 2018 | Docket Event |
Judge Kalemkarian Minute Order. See Attached Dept: 203 Time: 9:28 a.m. Judge D. Kalemkarian Clerk: L. Garvin Reporter: P. Whaley Petitioner: Not Present Respondent: Not Present Off Calendar. No appearance by either party. No POS. |
|
| March 06, 2018 | Docket Event |
Judge Kalemkarian Minute Order. See Attached 10:59a.m. D203 Judge D. Kalemkarian Clerk V. Carbajal Reporter P. Whaley Petitioner Present/Pro Per Respondent Not Present OSC Reissuance Spousal Support Other: Proof of Service does not reflect that the Request for Order was served to Respondent. The Court orders a reissuance. A new Court date must be obtained from the Clerk's Office today. A copy of the original moving papers along with the Request and order to Continue Hearing and Extend Temporary Emergency (ex parte) Orders must be served. Petitioner requests regarding transferring the case to Santa Maria, as she resides there now. The Court states Petitioner may file a request to change venue. Petitioner should seek legal advice on how to proceed. |
|
| March 06, 2018 | Docket Event |
Reissuance of OSC SS
Judge:
Kalemkarian, David
|
|
| March 06, 2018 | Docket Event |
Reissuance OSC/TRO Last Hearing: 03/06/18 Reissued Hearing to: 05/01/18 |
|
| February 16, 2018 | Docket Event | Return Letter | |
| February 15, 2018 | Docket Event |
Documents sent to FLEX for Request for Telephone Appearance review |
|
| January 26, 2018 | Docket Event | Proof of Service | |
| January 23, 2018 | Docket Event |
Initial OSC/Motion SS
Judge:
Kalemkarian, David
|
|
| January 23, 2018 | Docket Event | Return Letter | |
| January 23, 2018 | Docket Event |
Judge Kalemkarian Minute Order. See Attached 9:40a.m. D203 Judge D. Kalemkarian Clerk V. Carbajal Reporter P. Whaley Petitioner Present/Pro Per Respondent Not Present OSC SS Other: There is no proper proof of service in the Court's file. The Court orders a reissuance. A new Court date must be obtained from the Clerk's Office today. A copy of the original moving papers along with the Request and Order to Continue Hearing and Extend Temporary Emergency (ex parte) Orders must be served. |
|
| January 23, 2018 | Docket Event |
Reissuance OSC/TRO Last Hearing: 1/23/18 Reissued Hearing to:3/6/18 |
|
| January 22, 2018 | Docket Event |
Documents sent to Request for Telephone Appearance to FLEX |
|
| December 05, 2017 | Docket Event | Initial OSC/Motion - Re: Spousal Support | |
| December 05, 2017 | Docket Event | Income and Expense Declaration | |
| December 05, 2017 | Docket Event | Petition for Dissolution with Children | |
| December 05, 2017 | Docket Event | Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act |
