Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
XXXXX
A Dissolution - Minor Children case was filed by Pineda, Blanca, against Garcia, Jose Luis, in the jurisdiction of Fresno County. Judge D. Tyler Tharpe presiding.
Case Details
Case Number
Filing Date
October 01, 2015
Last Refreshed
February 21, 2021
Filing Location
Fresno County, CA
Category
Dissolution - Minor Children
Practice Area
Family
Matter Type
Divorce,Separation
Case Outcome Type
Judgment
Status
Dismissal
Case Duration
1 year, 4 months and 9 days
Parties
Plaintiffs
Pineda, Blanca
Defendants
Garcia, Jose Luis
Other Parties
Xxxxx
(Minor)
Case Events
| Date | Type | Description | |
|---|---|---|---|
| August 01, 2017 | Docket Event |
Dismissal Hearing
Judge: Tharpe, D Tyler |
|
| February 08, 2017 | Docket Event | Declaration for Default or Uncontested Disso or Legal Sep | |
| February 08, 2017 | Docket Event | Simplified Financial Statement | |
| February 08, 2017 | Docket Event | Declaration regarding Service of Declaration of Disclosure | |
| February 08, 2017 | Docket Event |
Notice of Entry of Judgment Conformed copies mailed in SASE |
|
| February 08, 2017 | Docket Event | Proof of Service of Summons | |
| February 07, 2017 | Docket Event |
Dismissal Hearing
Judge: Tharpe, D Tyler |
|
| February 07, 2017 | Docket Event |
Request to Enter Default As to Respondent. Judgment with A.H. in Self-Help for processing. |
|
| February 07, 2017 | Docket Event |
Judge Tharpe Minute Order. See attached. Minute order from Dept.: 202 Clerk: E Flores Reporter: C. Hernandez Nature of Hearing: Family Centered Case Status Minute Order Petitioner: Not Present Respondent: Not Present Next family centered case resolution conference is set for: 8/1/17 at 11 am in D202 Good cause has been shown why the case should not be dismissed at this time. The matter is hereby continued for dismissal. |
|
| September 20, 2016 | Docket Event |
Judge Tharpe Minute Order. See attached. Hrg: 9/20/2016 Judicial Officer: D. Tharpe Dept: 202 Time: 11:00 a.m. Clerk: M. Vang Bailiff: Harley Reporter: NR Petitioner present Counsel: Pro Per Respondent not present Hearing Type: Dismissal Hearing Continued to: 2/7/2017 Time: 11:00 a.m. Dept: 202 Issues: Dismissal hearing Other: Petitioner was present and have been assisted by a staff from the Self-Help Center. The matter is not called on the record. Matter continued for further dismissal hearing. Petitioner to provide notice to respondent. |
|
| September 20, 2016 | Docket Event |
Dismissal Hearing
Judge: Tharpe, D Tyler |
|
| June 27, 2016 | Docket Event | Clerk's Certificate of Mailing | |
| June 21, 2016 | Docket Event |
Judge Tharpe Minute Order. See attached. Minute order from Dept: 202 Clerk: Rbenavente Reporter: NR Nature of Hearing: Family Centered Case Status Minute Order Petitioner: Not Present Pro Per Respondent: Not Present Pro Per You are hereby ordered to appear in Department 202 on 9/20/16 at 11:00 a.m., to show cause why the above-referenced case should not be dismissed. Other: California law requires that Family Law matters proceed in an effective and timely manner from initial filing to final disposition. (Fam. Code 2450, subd. (a), and Standards of Judicial Administration, standard 5.30.) In deciding whether a case is progressing in an effective and timely manner, the Court considers procedural milestones, including the following: (A) A proof of service of Summons and petition should be filed within 60 days of case initiation; (B) If no response has been filed, and the parties have not agreed on an extension of time to respond, a request to enter default should be submitted within 60 days after the date the response was due; (C) The petitioner's preliminary declaration of disclosure should be served within 60 days of the filing of the petition; (D) When a default has been entered, a judgment should be submitted within 60 days of the entry of default; (E) Whether a trial date has been requested or scheduled; and (F) When the parties have notified the court that they are actively negotiating or mediating their case, a written agreement for judgment is submitted within six months of the date the petition was filed, or a request for trial date is submitted. (Cal. Rule of Court, rule 5.83(c)(4).) The Court has reason to believe that the above-referenced case is not progressing in an effective and timely manner. |
|
| June 21, 2016 | Docket Event |
1 Family - Centered Status Conference
Judge: Tharpe, D Tyler |
|
| December 07, 2015 | Docket Event |
Readiness OSC - Child Custody
Judge: Kalemkarian, David |
|
| December 07, 2015 | Docket Event |
Judge Kalemkarian Minute Order. See Attached Dept: 203 Time: 8:57 am Clerk: L.Garvin Not reported Petitioner present Respondent not present Hearing type Order to show cause / Child custody / Visitation / Readiness Off calendar. No proof of service. Other: The moving party requests to take the matter off calendar. |
|
| December 07, 2015 | Docket Event |
Readiness OSC - Child Visitation
Judge: Kalemkarian, David |
|
| October 01, 2015 | Docket Event | Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act | |
| October 01, 2015 | Docket Event | Order to Show Cause Readiness | |
| October 01, 2015 | Docket Event | Petition for Dissolution with Children | |
| October 01, 2015 | Docket Event | Income and Expense Declaration |
