Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
(a) This section applies to a person who claims death benefits as a dependent of the deceased employee. (b) A benefit which flowed from a deceased employee, at the time of death, on an established basis in at least monthly intervals to the person claiming to be dependent, is presumed to be a regular or recurring economic benefit. This presumption may be overcome by credible evidence. The burden is on the claimant to prove that benefits, which flowed less frequently than once a month, were regular or recurring at the time of the employee's death. (c) It shall be presumed that an economic benefit, whose value was equal to or greater than 20% of the person's net resources in the period (see subsection (d) of this section) for which the benefit was paid, is an economic benefit which contributed substantially to the person's welfare and livelihood. This presumption may be overcome by credible evidence. The burden is on the claimant to prove that benefits whose value was less than 20% of the person's net resources contributed significantly to the person's welfare and livelihood. (d) Net resources for the purpose of subsection (b) of this section are 100% of all wage and salary income and all other income including nonpecuniary income and all income of the individual's spouse, less 100% of social security taxes and federal income tax withholding. (e) The person claiming to be a dependent shall furnish sufficient information to enable the commission to accurately identify the net resources and to establish the existence of the economic benefit claimed. This information may include, but is not limited to, tax returns, a financial statement of the individual, and check stubs. (f) If an economic benefit was provided in the form of goods and services, the value shall be the market value of the same or similar goods and services in the same vicinity.
• CAUSE NO. 096-246952-10 • ETS DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC, § IN THE DISTRICT COURT d/b/a Sleuth Software, § § Plaintiff, § § …
• CAUSE NO. 352-243889-10 • WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., AS § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRUSTEE FOR THE REGISTERED § HOLDERS OF J.P. MORGAN CHASE § COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE …
Tarrant County, TX
May 25, 2010
CAUSE NO. 12-13143 MISSION HOME HEALTH OF § IN THE DISTRICT cour SAN DIEGO, INC., § § Plaintiff, § § No. v. § OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS, § EXTERNAL IT USA, INC. AND § BRAVURA NETWORKS, INC., § § Defendants. § 68th JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED PETITION, APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND AMENDED APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: COMES NOW, Plaintiff Mission Home Health of San Diego, Inc. (“Mission Home” or “Plaintiff’) a…
ST MoT -T ba Op, tor a pes, _ Na, NOVO 7 202 Cause no. {2- 13144 25} a hiny MISSION HOME HEALTH OF § IN THE DISTRICT COURR ;;. : BLO: =~ SAN DIEGO, INC., § Pg § oe 3 Plaintiff, § eh, § 3 PRE Eiyey . § OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS § EXTERNAL IT USA, INC. AND § BRAVURA NETWORKS, INC., § C5 8th § Defendants. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL PETITION AND APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: COMES NOW, Plaintiff Mission Home Heal…
EXHIBIT 24 TO THE UNSWORN DECLARATION OF ROXANA POPOVICI Execution Copy AMENDED AND RESTATED DEPOSITARY AGREEMENT by and among MIDWAY WIND, LLC, as the Project Company, CITIBANK, N.A., as the Energy Hedge Collateral Agent, and CITIBANK, N.A., as the Depositary Bank Da…
Harris County, TX
Jun 29, 2021
SWORN ACCOUNT
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.