Ohio Revised Code|Section 2953.02 | Review of judgments on appeal.

                                                

In a capital case in which a sentence of death is imposed for an offense committed before January 1, 1995, and in any other criminal case, including a conviction for the violation of an ordinance of a municipal corporation, the judgment or final order of a court of record inferior to the court of appeals may be reviewed in the court of appeals. A final order of an administrative officer or agency may be reviewed in the court of common pleas. A judgment or final order of the court of appeals involving a question arising under the Constitution of the United States or of this state may be appealed to the supreme court as a matter of right. This right of appeal from judgments and final orders of the court of appeals shall extend to cases in which a sentence of death is imposed for an offense committed before January 1, 1995, and in which the death penalty has been affirmed, felony cases in which the supreme court has directed the court of appeals to certify its record, and in all other criminal cases of public or general interest wherein the supreme court has granted a motion to certify the record of the court of appeals. In a capital case in which a sentence of death is imposed for an offense committed on or after January 1, 1995, the judgment or final order may be appealed from the trial court directly to the supreme court as a matter of right. The supreme court in criminal cases shall not be required to determine as to the weight of the evidence, except that, in cases in which a sentence of death is imposed for an offense committed on or after January 1, 1995, and in which the question of the weight of the evidence to support the judgment has been raised on appeal, the supreme court shall determine as to the weight of the evidence to support the judgment and shall determine as to the weight of the evidence to support the sentence of death as provided in section 2929.05 of the Revised Code.

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 1 page

~ Sh AL : se c eab a Las LSCOLA: IN 22DEC-5 PH 2:35 2012DEC -5 PH 2:13, IN THE COURT:OF COMMON PLEAS & ASHLAND COUNTY OHIO …

Case Filed

Jun 28, 2012

County

Ashland County, OH

Filed Date

Dec 05, 2012

Category

CRIMINAL

Judge

06/28/2012

preview-icon 1 page

~ eiLeD ony AL SCUUR. N 2OIZMAY25 PH 2:98 20IZHAY25. PH 2: 07 IN SNE AND OF COMMON PLEAS 4;, » 1 UN YY, OHIO CL. ER, u, AC ASI …

Case Filed

Jan 26, 2012

County

Ashland County, OH

Filed Date

May 25, 2012

Category

CRIMINAL

Judge

02/03/2012

preview-icon 4 pages

* Stompord Return, (eu(iiaruan of te E® IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ct? “"” MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO me 23 A HS poet STATE OF OHIO : PLAINTIFF, vs Case No:07CR5160 MICHAEL K. BROOKS gacro37i DEFENDANT. 07CR3778 Judge Jeffery Froelich Motion for Sentence Reduction Defendant brings this Motion For Sentence Reduction with hopes that this Honorable Court will grant said motion for the reasons are fully stated in the attached Memorandum In Support. Respectfully Submitted, Michael K. .Broo…

Case Filed

Nov 27, 2007

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Jan 23, 2009

preview-icon 4 pages

+ Stompand Betum, (ion FILED. w eee egies IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 1.393 A % 4 MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHTO(' -.' . STATE OF OHIO : PLAINTIFF, vs Case No:07CR5160 : O8CRO371 MICHAEL K. BROOKS OuCRa B60 DEFENDANT 07CR3778 Judge Jeffery Froelich Motion for Sentence Reduction Defendant brings this Motion For. Sentence Reduction with hopes that this Honorable Court will grant said motion for the reasons are fully stated in the attached Memorandum In Support. Respectfully Submitted, Michael K…

Case Filed

Sep 14, 2007

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Jan 23, 2009

preview-icon 2 pages

FILES Rees SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTOGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO SK HE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO STATE OF OHIO, Court of Appeals No.: CA 212276 Piaintiff-Appellee, Trial Court Case No.: 04-CR-702 ~vS.- MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL Tabitha Dawson, Defendant-Appeliant Now comes the Defendant-Appellant, Tabitha Dawson, ProSe, hereby respectfully requests this Court to appoint counsel in the above captioned case. The United States Supreme Court has long held that the Constitution does…

Case Filed

Nov 05, 2006

Case Status

OPEN

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Nov 07, 2006

Category

NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED

View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope