Any judgment creditor of an employee or officer of the state may maintain against the state a proceeding in garnishment of personal earnings under Chapter 2716. of the Revised Code to subject to the payment of the creditor's or judgment creditor's judgment any salary, wages, or other compensation that is owed or will be owed to the employee or officer of the state in the same manner, to the same extent, and in the same courts as any judgment creditor may subject, under the laws of this state, any salary, wages, or other compensation due a judgment debtor from any employer. In any proceeding of that nature against the state, the order of garnishment of personal earnings shall be served upon the director of administrative services and shall set forth the name of the state agency in which the judgment debtor is employed.
No proceeding in garnishment of personal earnings brought under section 2716.03 of the Revised Code shall be brought against a judgment debtor sooner than thirty days after the time an order and notice of garnishment is served upon the director of administrative services, regardless of who brings the proceeding or who brought the last successful proceeding.
(C) the director the director
Last updated October 13, 2021 at 9:15 AM
5 pages
Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2012 Apr 06 10:06 AM-08CV015726 OA342 - F85 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO CIVIL DIVISION UNIFUND CCR PARTNERS 0 CASE NO. o8CV-15726 PLAINTIFF 0 vs. Oo MAGISTRATE McCARTHY DIANE L. BELL 0 DEFENDANT oO MAGISTRATE’S DECISION ON OBJECTION TO GARNISHMENT On April 5, 2012, this matter came on for a hearing before this duty magistrate on defendant’s objections to a wage garnishment order that was issued by this co…
5 pages
Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2012 Apr 06 10:06 AM-08CV015726 OA342 - F85 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO CIVIL DIVISION UNIFUND CCR PARTNERS 0 CASE NO. o8CV-15726 PLAINTIFF 0 vs. Oo MAGISTRATE McCARTHY DIANE L. BELL 0 DEFENDANT oO MAGISTRATE’S DECISION ON OBJECTION TO GARNISHMENT On April 5, 2012, this matter came on for a hearing before this duty magistrate on defendant’s objections to a wage garnishment order that was issued by this co…
24 pages
COPY SAMUEL M. HORRIGAN IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 4) SUMMIT COUNTY , OHIO pug JUL VS F CIVIL DIVISION cuit COUN ONES Gu ERK C OF OHIO EDISON COMPANY 76 NORTH MAIN STREET CASE NO. 2009-02-1422 AKRON OHIO 44308 JUDGE COSGROVE AND AMENDED ANSWER WELTMAN WEINBERG COMBINED ANSWER OF & REIS CO L.P.A DIANA & EDWARD WILLIAMS 323 W. LAKESIDE AVE SUITE 200 CLEVELAND OHIO 44113 SUMMITT COUNTY LACK OF JURISDICTION VIOLATION OF ORC 2307.07 & 2716.03 AND VIOLATION OF MY 157 AMENDMENT RIGHTS VIOL…
Feb 19, 2009
Summit County, OH
Jul 15, 2009
OTHER CIVIL
PATRICIA A COSGROVE
43 pages
COPY. CL ERK OF COURTS IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS SUMMIT COUNTY, OHIO BRIAN RANDLES ) CASE NO. CV 2008 11 7659 Plaintiff ) JUDGE GIPPIN vs. ) DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CITY OF NEW FRANKLIN, et al. ) Defendants ) Now come defendants, City of New Franklin, Mayor Al Bollas and Jeff Olsen, by and through counsel, and respectfully moves this Court, pursuant to Civ.R. 56, for an order granting summary judgment on plaintiffs claims against defendants. This motion is supported by t…
Summit County, OH
Sep 01, 2009
OTHER CIVIL
ROBERT M. GIPPIN
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
Your content views addon has successfully been added.
No Worries!
Adding your team is easy
in the "Manage Company Users" tab
Section 124.09 | Civil service powers of director of administrative services.
