Ohio Administrative Code|Rule 901:5-11-08 | Demonstration of competence.

                                                

(A) Each applicant for a pesticide applicator license shall show that the applicant possesses adequate knowledge of general pesticide application principles and competence to apply pesticides by passing a general core examination and an additional examination for each applicable pesticide-use category. In addition, each applicant for a commercial applicator license shall demonstrate adequate knowledge and competence to conduct diagnostic inspections within the pesticide-use categories for which the applicant seeks licensure.

(1) Opportunity to take examinations will be provided at such times and places as determined by the director in consideration of the number and location of requests.

(2) A pesticide applicator may apply to broaden their license to include a new pesticide-use category at any time.

(3) In establishing the standards for training and examination of pesticide applicators, the director will be guided by the standards set forth in the "State Plan for Certification of Applicators" as approved by the administrator of the United States department of environmental protection.

(4) Each applicant for licensure as a commercial applicator in the category of wood-destroying insect diagnostic inspection shall submit a valid certificate verifying that they have completed the Ohio wood-destroying insect inspection program.

(5) Applicants who fail to pass the general core examination shall not be issued a license.

(6) Except for private applicators, applicants who fail to pass at least one pesticide-use category examination shall not be issued a license.

(7) Applicants who fail to pass an examination may apply to be re-tested at a pre-arranged time and location, but no earlier than five business days after a previous examination except by special permission of the director.

(8) Applicants who either fail the general core examination or fail to pass at least one pesticide-use category may re-utilize passing scores on either the general core exam or a pesticide use category so long as those scores are not older than one year. If the applicant is unable to obtain licensure within that year, the applicant must pass both a new core examination and a new pesticide-use category examination, even if the applicant had previously received a passing score on either the core or a pesticide-use category examination.

(B) Re-examination shall be required at three-year intervals, except that a pesticide applicator may be exempted from re-examination if they have participated in the minimum amount of approved training during the three years prior to the date of their scheduled re-examination. Notwithstanding the minimum number of hours set forth below, a licensee shall participate in at least one-half hour of training for each pesticide-use category in which they are licensed in order to avoid re-examination in that particular category.

(1) For commercial applicators, the minimum amount of approved training required shall be five hours. Of the five hours, at least one hour shall consist of core training material and at least one-half hour shall consist of training material specific to the pesticide-use category in which the commercial applicator is licensed.

(2) For private applicators:

(a) Licensed in pesticide use categories other than the category of specialty uses, the minimum amount of approved training required shall be three hours. Of the three hours, at least one hour shall consist of core training material and at least one half hour shall consist of training material specific to each pesticide-use category in which the private applicator is licensed.

(b) Licensed only in the category of specialty uses, the minimum amount of approved training required shall be three hours. Of the three hours, at least one hour shall consist of core training material.

(C) In no case shall an applicant be permitted to take an examination or a re-examination unless the applicant has presented at the time of the examination or re-examination a current government-issued photographic identification to the ODA representative administering the examination or re-examination. This paragraph shall not apply to an applicant whose religion does not permit the applicant to be photographed.

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 7 pages

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as Trustee under Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated as of June 1, 2007 Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC Trust 2007-BR5 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-BR5 Plaintiff, vs. Kristina Krzeminski, et al. Defendants. Case No. 2007 ev 07262 Judge Jeffrey E. Froelich PRAECIPE FOR ORDER FOR SALE To the Clerk of Courts: Please issue an Order of Sale to the Sheriff of Montgomery Count…

Case Filed

Aug 30, 2007

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Nov 07, 2007

Category

MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE

preview-icon 4 pages

age jgitovene IN THE SOMMODREPEEAS SQURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO 1 o PALER Ley VIL DIVISION C HORTEOMERY SATS, Case No. 05 0668 American General Financial Services, Inc. Judge Hall Plaintiff, v. AMENDED PRAECIPE FOR ORDER OF SALE Janet M. Thomas, et al. Defendants. TO THE CLERK: Please issue an Order of Sale to the Sheriff of Montgomery County, Ohio directing him to appraise, advertise in the Daily Court Reporter and sell the property as further described in the complaint filed herein …

Case Filed

Jan 27, 2005

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Apr 25, 2005

Category

MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE

preview-icon 4 pages

coun». FILED OURY ng COMMON PLegg 06 SEP 27 PH 1:54 CLER GILEY . monte er tars IS 0 " F.73391\Ketteringikak IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO CIVIL DIVISION American General Financial Services Case No. 06-2141 Plaintiff, Judge v. : AMENDED | Alonzo J. Lattimore, et al. PRAECIPE FOR ORDER OF SALE Defendants. TO THE CLERK: Please issue an Order of Sale to the Sheriff of Montgomery County, Ohio directing him to appraise, advertise in the Dayton Daily News and sell the pr…

Case Filed

Mar 06, 2006

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Sep 27, 2006

Category

MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE

preview-icon 52 pages

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO 11CVF 2 1772 Spacewalk Medina, CASE NO. Appellant, JUDGE -vs- OHIO DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, NOTICE OF APPEAL Appellee. Now comes, Appellant. Spacewalk Medina, by and through counsel, Kurt A. Dauterman, and respectfully submits his preliminary objection to the report from the Ohio Department of Agriculture, Administrative Order that was issued on January 6, 2011 and mailed on January 12, 2011 to Appellee. A copy of Ohio Department of Agric…

Case Name 11 CV 001772
Case Filed

Jan 29, 2011

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Franklin County, OH

Filed Date

Jan 29, 2011

Judge Hon. STEPHEN L MCINTOSH Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for STEPHEN L MCINTOSH
preview-icon 1 page

SURE O8 AR cla MONT! PICKREL. SCHAEFFER EBELING “Aga Pkt Ane 2700 KETTERING TOWER 40, MAIN STREET DAYTON, OHIO 45429-2700 997-229-1130 vewm-pselaw.com (iitocm R27 PH 2:57 FL INTHE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO RK GF COURTS. CIVIL DIVISION OMERY CO.. OHIO COUNTY CORP * + Case No. 05CV5620 Plaintiff, * * (Judge David A. Gowdown) -vs- * PRAECIPE FOR ORDER ESTATE OF DESSIE LEE FERGUSON, * OF SALE et al. * Defendants. TO: Clerk of Montgomery County Common Pleas Court Please i…

Case Filed

Jul 19, 2005

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Apr 27, 2006

Category

MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE

View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope