Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
(A) No inmate shall be released from an
institution when a detainer has been placed against the inmate by lawful
authorities to answer for criminal charges or completion of sentence within the
jurisdiction of such authorities, except pursuant to this rule
and:(1) Interstate agreement
on detainers, section 2963.30 of the Revised Code.(2) The procedures in
section 2941.401 of the Revised Code.(B) At least thirty days prior to the
scheduled release of any such inmate, notification of the pending release date
shall be communicated to the authority that placed the detainer. Such notice
shall be given without regard to whether or not the release is pursuant to rule
5120:1-1-10 of the Administrative Code or upon completion of maximum
sentence.(C) Inmates subject to detainer upon
completion of maximum sentence shall be released on the date specified. In no
event shall such inmate remain in custody of the department of rehabilitation
and correction beyond the expiration date of sentence upon request of the
detaining authority or otherwise.(D) Inmates otherwise eligible for
release pursuant to rule 5120:1-1-10 of the Administrative Code may, at the
discretion of the parole board, be released:(1) Subject to
notification to a detaining authority that the inmate is to be released.
Failure of the detaining authority to notify the managing officer of the
holding institution of its intent to take the inmate into custody shall result
in the removal of the detainer.(2) Subject to
enforcement of a detainer as a precondition of release. Failure of the
detaining authority to make arrangements to take such releasee into custody on
the scheduled date of release, unless extended by the parole board upon
request, will cause the removal of the detainer. The inmate shall be notified
of such conditional release, and the consequences of such failure, pursuant to
paragraph (D) of rule 5120:1-1-10 of the Administrative Code.(E) If the detainer is from another state and the inmate
has declined to waive extradition, the inmate shall be delivered on the
scheduled release date to the sheriff of the county in which the inmate is
incarcerated pending extradition to the detaining authority.(F) Release on detainer pursuant to this rule shall be at
no expense to the state of Ohio.Last updated April 8, 2021 at 12:25 PM
Apr 24, 2012
Lorain County
Lorain County, OH
Feb 18, 2015
Hon. Burge, Judge James
Lorain County
Lorain County, OH
Oct 30, 2007
Lorain County
Lorain County, OH
Jul 26, 2013
Lorain County
Lorain County, OH
INTHE COMMON PLEAS COURT oF MONTGOMERY COI (fic | of teen PLEAS STATE OF OHIO, besa oe - Hue h2 Case Nos. 06-CR-1252, 06-CR-935, 06- aor HAY -3. Fit case Nes Plaintiff, GRECORYS. BVISH : . moat es IO (Judge Dennis J. Langer) “' Vv. KEITH R. BAEKER : DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING MOTION TO Defendant. : SUSPEND FINE, PAYMENT OF COURT COSTS AND/OR RESTITUTION AND OVERRULING MOTION REQUESTING THE SUSPENSION THE INDIGENT INMATES ACCOUNT . April 10, 2007, the Defendant Keith R. Baek…
Mar 10, 2006
CLOSED
Montgomery County, OH
May 03, 2007
1 ‘| IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY CO Iffilf . PILED ae oun pe CORD PLAS STATE OF OHIO, ,. _3 PH bia : Case Nos. 06-CR-1252, 06-CR-935, 06- aor Hay -3. Pil CR 1041 Plaintiff, GATGURY A PRMSH CLERW OF COURTS Judge Dennis J. Li vy. MONTGOMERY CU, OHIO . (Judge Dennis J. Langer) KEITH R. BAEKER : DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING MOTION TO Defendant. : SUSPEND FINE, PAYMENT OF COURT COSTS AND/OR RESTITUTION AND OVERRULING MOTION REQUESTING THE SUSPENSION THE INDIGENT INMATES ACCOUNT. April…
Mar 06, 2006
CLOSED
Montgomery County, OH
May 03, 2007
coun, GF 08 STATE OF OHI -3 PR yu : Case Nos. 06-CR-{252, 06-CR-935, 06- ae HAY 3 CR-1041 (Judge Dennis J. Langer) v. KEITH R. BAEKER : DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING MOTION TO Defendant. : SUSPEND FINE, PAYMENT OF COURT COSTS AND/OR RESTITUTION AND OVERRULING MOTION REQUESTING THE SUSPENSION THE INDIGENT INMATES ACCOUNT . April 10, 2007, the Defendant Keith R. Backer, filed a pro se Motion to Suspend Fine, Payment of Court Costs And/or Restitution and Motion Requesting the Suspension the …
Mar 27, 2006
CLOSED
Montgomery County, OH
May 03, 2007
ELECTRONICALLY FILED COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Sunday, March 16, 2014 3:00:56 PM CASE NUMBER: 2011 CR 02799 Docket ID: 18939580 …
Aug 14, 2011
CLOSED
Montgomery County, OH
Mar 16, 2014
ELECTRONICALLY FILED COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Monday, September 23, 2013 2:31:05 PM CASE NUMBER: 2010 CR 02215 Docket ID: 18488150…
Jul 14, 2010
CLOSED
Montgomery County, OH
Sep 23, 2013
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.