Ohio Administrative Code|Rule 5120-9-51 | Internet access for incarcerated individuals.

                                                

(A) Incarcerated individuals may only
access the internet if they are participating in an approved educational
program with direct supervision that requires the use of the internet for
training or research purposes. The determination of which programs have
educational value is at the discretion of the director, or designee, and a list
of these programs may be provided to the incarcerated population.

(B) Criteria by which incarcerated individuals may be
screened and approved for access or training involving the internet shall
include the following:

(1) Only incarcerated
individuals enrolled in approved programs shall be eligible for internet access
under this rule.

(2) The incarcerated individual's
current offense of commitment and past criminal conduct may be taken into
consideration when determining whether an individual may be eligible for
internet access under this rule.

(3) The Ohio central
school system superintendent, or designee, in consultation with the department
of rehabilitation and correction (DRC) chief of the office of information
technology (OIT) or a designee, and the deputy director of operations, or
designee, shall have the discretion to deny access to the internet to
incarcerated individuals based upon security concerns or the institutional
behavior of the inmate individual on a case by case basis. Relevant subject
matter experts may be consulted in making this determination.

(C) Only pre-approved internet sites will be accessible on
the computers used by incarcerated individuals in an educational
program.

(D) Designation of the authority to approve internet sites
for authorized use: The Ohio central school system superintendent shall lead
and designate a committee comprised of subject matter experts to serve as the
designated authority for the pre-approval of internet sites for authorized use.
One of the members of the committee must be a representative of the DRC OIT,
chosen by the DRC chief of OIT. The committee will confer and recommend
internet sites for the superintendent to pre-approve.

(E) A process for the periodic review of
the operation of the system, including users of the system and the internet
sites accessed by the system: the DRC chief of OIT, or designee, shall also be
responsible for periodic review of the operation of the system, including users
of the system and sites accessed by the system. The chief of OIT, or designee,
shall utilize available technology and/or services to ensure that access to the
internet by incarcerated individuals is restricted only to those sites
pre-approved under this rule.

(F) Sanctions that must be imposed
against incarcerated individuals and staff members who violate department rules
governing access to the internet:

(1) Any staff member,
contractor, or volunteer who permits or assists in unauthorized access to the
internet by an incarcerated individual may be subject to appropriate
disciplinary measures for conduct in violation of this rule, and may be subject
to prosecution under section 2921.44 of the Revised Code.

(2) Incarcerated
individuals who violate this rule may be found to have violated one or more of
the inmate rules of conduct set forth in rule 5120-9-06 of the Administrative
Code and may be subjected to an appropriate penalty as set forth in rule
5120-9-07 or 5120-9-08 of the Administrative Code.

(3) Incarcerated
individuals in a correctional institution under the control of the department
of rehabilitation and correction may also be subject to prosecution under
division (C)(2) of section 5145.31 of the Revised Code. Incarcerated
individuals in a private correctional facility, as defined in section 9.06 or
9.07 of the Revised Code, are subject to prosecution under division (C)(2) of
section 9.08 of the Revised Code.



Last updated January 5, 2022 at 4:36 PM


View Latest Dockets

Filed

Feb 18, 2015

Judge

Hon. Burge, Judge James

Court

Lorain County

County

Lorain County, OH

Practice Area

Criminal

Matter Type

General Criminal

Filed

Apr 24, 2012

Court

Lorain County

County

Lorain County, OH

Practice Area

Criminal

Matter Type

General Criminal

Filed

Oct 30, 2007

Court

Lorain County

County

Lorain County, OH

Filed

Oct 23, 2015

Court

Lorain County

County

Lorain County, OH

Practice Area

Criminal

Matter Type

General Criminal

Filed

Jul 26, 2013

Court

Lorain County

County

Lorain County, OH

Practice Area

Criminal

Matter Type

General Criminal

View More Dockets

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 2 pages

INTHE COMMON PLEAS COURT oF MONTGOMERY COI (fic | of teen PLEAS STATE OF OHIO, besa oe - Hue h2 Case Nos. 06-CR-1252, 06-CR-935, 06- aor HAY -3. Fit case Nes Plaintiff, GRECORYS. BVISH : . moat es IO (Judge Dennis J. Langer) “' Vv. KEITH R. BAEKER : DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING MOTION TO Defendant. : SUSPEND FINE, PAYMENT OF COURT COSTS AND/OR RESTITUTION AND OVERRULING MOTION REQUESTING THE SUSPENSION THE INDIGENT INMATES ACCOUNT . April 10, 2007, the Defendant Keith R. Baek…

Case Filed

Mar 10, 2006

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

May 03, 2007

preview-icon 2 pages

1 ‘| IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY CO Iffilf . PILED ae oun pe CORD PLAS STATE OF OHIO, ,. _3 PH bia : Case Nos. 06-CR-1252, 06-CR-935, 06- aor Hay -3. Pil CR 1041 Plaintiff, GATGURY A PRMSH CLERW OF COURTS Judge Dennis J. Li vy. MONTGOMERY CU, OHIO . (Judge Dennis J. Langer) KEITH R. BAEKER : DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING MOTION TO Defendant. : SUSPEND FINE, PAYMENT OF COURT COSTS AND/OR RESTITUTION AND OVERRULING MOTION REQUESTING THE SUSPENSION THE INDIGENT INMATES ACCOUNT. April…

Case Filed

Mar 06, 2006

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

May 03, 2007

preview-icon 2 pages

coun, GF 08 STATE OF OHI -3 PR yu : Case Nos. 06-CR-{252, 06-CR-935, 06- ae HAY 3 CR-1041 (Judge Dennis J. Langer) v. KEITH R. BAEKER : DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING MOTION TO Defendant. : SUSPEND FINE, PAYMENT OF COURT COSTS AND/OR RESTITUTION AND OVERRULING MOTION REQUESTING THE SUSPENSION THE INDIGENT INMATES ACCOUNT . April 10, 2007, the Defendant Keith R. Backer, filed a pro se Motion to Suspend Fine, Payment of Court Costs And/or Restitution and Motion Requesting the Suspension the …

Case Filed

Mar 27, 2006

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

May 03, 2007

preview-icon 3 pages

ELECTRONICALLY FILED COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Sunday, March 16, 2014 3:00:56 PM CASE NUMBER: 2011 CR 02799 Docket ID: 18939580 …

Case Filed

Aug 14, 2011

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Mar 16, 2014

preview-icon 6 pages

ELECTRONICALLY FILED COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Monday, September 23, 2013 2:31:05 PM CASE NUMBER: 2010 CR 02215 Docket ID: 18488150…

Case Filed

Jul 14, 2010

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Sep 23, 2013

View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope