Ohio Administrative Code|Rule 5120-9-11 | Placement in a limited privilege or restrictive housing assignment pending investigation.

                                                

(A) Subject to the time frames set forth
in this rule, an inmate may be placed in a limited privilege housing assignment
or a restrictive housing assignment to facilitate an investigation for the
issuance of a conduct report, other administrative action or criminal
prosecution.

(B) Placements shall not be in a
restrictive housing assignment unless the inmate poses a threat or danger to
himself or others, to institutional property or to the security of the
institution, and a limited privilege housing assignment is not sufficient to
control the risks presented.

(C) An initial placement into a
restrictive housing assignment must be approved, denied or modified in writing
within twenty-four hours by an appropriate and higher authority not included in
the initial placement designated by the responsible managing officer, who may
extend the time of placement as set forth in paragraph (D)(1) of this
rule.

(D) An inmate may be held in a limited privilege or restrictive
housing assignment pursuant to an investigation for the following
periods:

(1) The initial placement
into a limited privilege housing assignment under paragraph (A) of this rule
may continue for seven calendar days from the date of placement without need
for additional approval. The initial approval of placement in a restrictive
housing assignment in paragraph (C) of this rule may be continued for seven
calendar days from the date of approval by the appropriate and higher authority
appointed by the responsible managing officer.

(2) If the investigation
has not concluded at the end of the initial seven calendar day period, the
managing officer may authorize that the inmate be held in the same housing
status for an additional seven days. This authorization shall be in writing
with a copy sent to the appropriate regional director.

(3) If the investigation
is not completed within this fourteen calendar day period, the managing officer
may request that the regional director approve retaining the inmate in the same
housing status for an additional seven calendar days.

(4) After twenty-one
calendar days, upon the managing officer's request, the director or
director's designee may authorize holding an inmate in the same housing
status for investigative purposes until the completion of the investigation
when,

(a) The matter under investigation involves the commission or
possible commission of a felony,

(b) The investigation cannot be completed within twenty-one
calendar days, and,

(c) Releasing the inmate to general population would jeopardize
the safety of the inmate or any other individual, the successful completion of
the investigation, or the security of the institution.

The decision of the director or the
director's designee shall be in writing and shall state the anticipated
duration of the extension and the reason therefore. The extension may be
renewed so long as the conditions described in this rule continue to
exist.

(E) For placements in restrictive housing that are extended
beyond twenty-one days, the director or director's designee shall consult
with managing officer to determine whether the inmate could be managed in a
limited privilege housing assignment pending the completion of the
investigation. If the placement in a restrictive housing assignment is
continued, the director or the directors designee shall document the
reasons for the continuation.

(F) For placements in restrictive housing that are extended
beyond twenty-one days, the director or director's designee shall consult
with the managing officer to ensure that the inmate is not seriously mentally
ill. In the event the inmate is seriously mentally ill, the managing officer
shall make other arrangements to manage an inmate in limited privilege housing,
an appropriate mental health unit or other appropriate placement that is not a
restrictive housing assignment pending the completion of the
investigation.

(G) In the event an inmate is charged with misconduct and given a
disciplinary sanction under rule 5120-9-07 or 5120-9-08 of the Administrative
Code, the inmate shall be given credit for time served in an investigation
status under this rule.

View Latest Dockets

Filed

Apr 24, 2012

Court

Lorain County

County

Lorain County, OH

Practice Area

Criminal

Matter Type

General Criminal

Filed

Feb 18, 2015

Judge

Hon. Burge, Judge James

Court

Lorain County

County

Lorain County, OH

Practice Area

Criminal

Matter Type

General Criminal

Filed

Oct 30, 2007

Court

Lorain County

County

Lorain County, OH

Filed

Oct 23, 2015

Court

Lorain County

County

Lorain County, OH

Practice Area

Criminal

Matter Type

General Criminal

Filed

Jul 26, 2013

Court

Lorain County

County

Lorain County, OH

Practice Area

Criminal

Matter Type

General Criminal

View More Dockets

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 2 pages

INTHE COMMON PLEAS COURT oF MONTGOMERY COI (fic | of teen PLEAS STATE OF OHIO, besa oe - Hue h2 Case Nos. 06-CR-1252, 06-CR-935, 06- aor HAY -3. Fit case Nes Plaintiff, GRECORYS. BVISH : . moat es IO (Judge Dennis J. Langer) “' Vv. KEITH R. BAEKER : DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING MOTION TO Defendant. : SUSPEND FINE, PAYMENT OF COURT COSTS AND/OR RESTITUTION AND OVERRULING MOTION REQUESTING THE SUSPENSION THE INDIGENT INMATES ACCOUNT . April 10, 2007, the Defendant Keith R. Baek…

Case Filed

Mar 10, 2006

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

May 03, 2007

preview-icon 2 pages

1 ‘| IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY CO Iffilf . PILED ae oun pe CORD PLAS STATE OF OHIO, ,. _3 PH bia : Case Nos. 06-CR-1252, 06-CR-935, 06- aor Hay -3. Pil CR 1041 Plaintiff, GATGURY A PRMSH CLERW OF COURTS Judge Dennis J. Li vy. MONTGOMERY CU, OHIO . (Judge Dennis J. Langer) KEITH R. BAEKER : DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING MOTION TO Defendant. : SUSPEND FINE, PAYMENT OF COURT COSTS AND/OR RESTITUTION AND OVERRULING MOTION REQUESTING THE SUSPENSION THE INDIGENT INMATES ACCOUNT. April…

Case Filed

Mar 06, 2006

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

May 03, 2007

preview-icon 2 pages

coun, GF 08 STATE OF OHI -3 PR yu : Case Nos. 06-CR-{252, 06-CR-935, 06- ae HAY 3 CR-1041 (Judge Dennis J. Langer) v. KEITH R. BAEKER : DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING MOTION TO Defendant. : SUSPEND FINE, PAYMENT OF COURT COSTS AND/OR RESTITUTION AND OVERRULING MOTION REQUESTING THE SUSPENSION THE INDIGENT INMATES ACCOUNT . April 10, 2007, the Defendant Keith R. Backer, filed a pro se Motion to Suspend Fine, Payment of Court Costs And/or Restitution and Motion Requesting the Suspension the …

Case Filed

Mar 27, 2006

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

May 03, 2007

preview-icon 3 pages

ELECTRONICALLY FILED COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Sunday, March 16, 2014 3:00:56 PM CASE NUMBER: 2011 CR 02799 Docket ID: 18939580 …

Case Filed

Aug 14, 2011

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Mar 16, 2014

preview-icon 6 pages

ELECTRONICALLY FILED COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Monday, September 23, 2013 2:31:05 PM CASE NUMBER: 2010 CR 02215 Docket ID: 18488150…

Case Filed

Jul 14, 2010

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Sep 23, 2013

View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope