Ohio Administrative Code|Rule 5120-9-04 | Appropriate supervision, discrimination and racial issues.

                                                

(A) Discrimination with regards to supervision and administrative actions against any inmate or group of inmates, on the basis of race, color, religion, gender, sexual orientation, disability, age or national origin, by any staff member, or by any group or individual representing the department is strictly prohibited. Any substantiated acts of discrimination on the part of staff shall be addressed through the employee disciplinary process, which may include such sanctions as suspension or removal.

(B) As used herein, the term "inappropriate supervision" means any continuous method of annoying or needlessly harassing an inmate or group of inmates, including, but not limited to, abusive language, racial slurs, and the writing of inmate conduct reports strictly as a means of harassment. A single incident may, due to its severity or egregiousness, be considered inappropriate supervision for purposes of this rule.

(C) To provide a monitoring mechanism to ensure conduct reports are not being issued strictly for harassment purposes the department of rehabilitation and correction shall keep a record of conduct reports written by each staff member. The record shall include a copy of the conduct report and its disposition.

(D) Inmates may always address issues of alleged discrimination, including inappropriate supervision by utilizing the inmate grievance procedures in accordance with rule 5120-9-31 of the Administrative Code.

(E) Notwithstanding paragraph (D) of this rule, when any staff member receives an inmate complaint that appears to allege inappropriate supervision as defined by this rule, the staff member shall immediately forward the complaint to the inspector of institutional services for review.

(F) If after review the inspector of institutional services determines the complaint to constitute a possible violation of appropriate supervision the following procedure shall apply:

(1) The inspector of institutional services shall promptly interview the inmate who wrote the complaint. The inmate shall at this time be advised of the availability of the inmate grievance procedures if the inmate wishes to pursue the complaint on his own behalf.

(2) Regardless of the inmate's decision whether or not to utilize the inmate grievance procedures, if the inspector of institutional services, based on his interview with the inmate, finds that the inmate's complaint may have merit, the inspector of institutional services shall conduct further investigation, including conducting interviews of the staff member(s) involved, potential or identified witnesses, and anyone else the inspector of institutional services feels may have relevant testimony to give. If relevant to the complaint, the inspector of institutional services shall review the staff member's conduct report writing record.

(3) After the inspector of institutional services has completed the investigation the inspector shall write a report to the managing officer, which shall include the inmate's original complaint, the inspector of institutional services' findings of fact, and the evidence upon which the finding is based. The inspector of institutional services shall then make a conclusion as to whether or not the supervision of the staff member was appropriate. In cases where the inmate has filed a grievance the inspector of institutional services shall also provide the inmate with a disposition to the grievance, which will include the inspector of institutional services' findings, consistent with rule 5120-9-31 of the Administrative Code. The inspector's report to the managing officer shall also serve as the administrative investigation into conduct which may be in violation of departmental policies procedures and/or rules. The inspector's report may be used to support employee disciplinary actions.

(4) The managing officer may order additional investigation, if the managing officer deems necessary. At the point the managing officer decides the incident has been thoroughly investigated, the managing officer shall take any appropriate action necessary.

(5) A copy of all documents related to the complaint and investigation, including the report to the managing officer and the managing officer's response, if any, shall be maintained by the inspector of institutional services in accordance with the established and applicable record retention schedule.

(G) All employee orientation and in-service training and staff development shall include extensive programs in interpersonal communications and human relations, including appropriate supervision and cultural sensitivity.

(H) So far as reasonably possible, and consistent with all other applicable constitutional and statutory requirements, institutional programs and work assignments should closely reflect the racial composition of the institution's inmate population.

View Latest Dockets

Filed

Apr 24, 2012

Court

Lorain County

County

Lorain County, OH

Practice Area

Criminal

Matter Type

General Criminal

Filed

Feb 18, 2015

Judge

Hon. Burge, Judge James

Court

Lorain County

County

Lorain County, OH

Practice Area

Criminal

Matter Type

General Criminal

Filed

Oct 30, 2007

Court

Lorain County

County

Lorain County, OH

Filed

Oct 23, 2015

Court

Lorain County

County

Lorain County, OH

Practice Area

Criminal

Matter Type

General Criminal

Filed

Jul 26, 2013

Court

Lorain County

County

Lorain County, OH

Practice Area

Criminal

Matter Type

General Criminal

View More Dockets

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 2 pages

INTHE COMMON PLEAS COURT oF MONTGOMERY COI (fic | of teen PLEAS STATE OF OHIO, besa oe - Hue h2 Case Nos. 06-CR-1252, 06-CR-935, 06- aor HAY -3. Fit case Nes Plaintiff, GRECORYS. BVISH : . moat es IO (Judge Dennis J. Langer) “' Vv. KEITH R. BAEKER : DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING MOTION TO Defendant. : SUSPEND FINE, PAYMENT OF COURT COSTS AND/OR RESTITUTION AND OVERRULING MOTION REQUESTING THE SUSPENSION THE INDIGENT INMATES ACCOUNT . April 10, 2007, the Defendant Keith R. Baek…

Case Filed

Mar 10, 2006

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

May 03, 2007

preview-icon 2 pages

1 ‘| IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY CO Iffilf . PILED ae oun pe CORD PLAS STATE OF OHIO, ,. _3 PH bia : Case Nos. 06-CR-1252, 06-CR-935, 06- aor Hay -3. Pil CR 1041 Plaintiff, GATGURY A PRMSH CLERW OF COURTS Judge Dennis J. Li vy. MONTGOMERY CU, OHIO . (Judge Dennis J. Langer) KEITH R. BAEKER : DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING MOTION TO Defendant. : SUSPEND FINE, PAYMENT OF COURT COSTS AND/OR RESTITUTION AND OVERRULING MOTION REQUESTING THE SUSPENSION THE INDIGENT INMATES ACCOUNT. April…

Case Filed

Mar 06, 2006

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

May 03, 2007

preview-icon 2 pages

coun, GF 08 STATE OF OHI -3 PR yu : Case Nos. 06-CR-{252, 06-CR-935, 06- ae HAY 3 CR-1041 (Judge Dennis J. Langer) v. KEITH R. BAEKER : DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING MOTION TO Defendant. : SUSPEND FINE, PAYMENT OF COURT COSTS AND/OR RESTITUTION AND OVERRULING MOTION REQUESTING THE SUSPENSION THE INDIGENT INMATES ACCOUNT . April 10, 2007, the Defendant Keith R. Backer, filed a pro se Motion to Suspend Fine, Payment of Court Costs And/or Restitution and Motion Requesting the Suspension the …

Case Filed

Mar 27, 2006

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

May 03, 2007

preview-icon 3 pages

ELECTRONICALLY FILED COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Sunday, March 16, 2014 3:00:56 PM CASE NUMBER: 2011 CR 02799 Docket ID: 18939580 …

Case Filed

Aug 14, 2011

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Mar 16, 2014

preview-icon 6 pages

ELECTRONICALLY FILED COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Monday, September 23, 2013 2:31:05 PM CASE NUMBER: 2010 CR 02215 Docket ID: 18488150…

Case Filed

Jul 14, 2010

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Sep 23, 2013

View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope