Ohio Administrative Code|Rule 5101:12-80-10.2 | Prorating support collections.

                                                

(A) When the office of child support
(OCS) or a child support enforcement agency (CSEA) receives a collection for or
from an obligor with more than one support order and there are no instructions
included with the collection or remitter instructions cannot be obtained for
apportioning the payment between the support orders, OCS or the CSEA shall
identify the qualified support orders and prorate the collection. A prorated
collection shall be allocated in accordance with rules 5101:12-80-10 and
5101:12-80-10.1 of the Administrative Code.

(B) For the purpose of the calculations
described in this rule:

(1) A support order or a
case without a support order is considered a "qualified" support
order when:

(a) The collection is received as a result of a notice of
proposed action having been issued to the obligor; or

(b) The obligor makes the support payment and a notice of
proposed action has not been issued to the obligor.

(2) "Monthly
obligation" means the sum of the current obligation and any ordered
payment(s).

(C) Scenarios illustrating qualified
support orders include:

(1) An obligor has three
support orders and two of the support orders were submitted for and met all the
criteria for a federal income tax refund offset. The two support orders that
were submitted for offset would be considered qualified support orders for
purposes of prorating a federal income tax refund offset; the third support
order would not be considered a qualified support order and so would not
receive any of the prorated federal income tax refund offset
collection.

(2) An obligor has three
support orders and the CSEA issued an order to the obligor's employer to
attach a lump sum payment on two of the support orders. Only the support orders
that the lump sum order was issued for would be considered qualified support
orders for purposes of prorating the lump sum payment.

(3) One CSEA has administrative
responsibility for an obligor's two support orders and a second CSEA has
administrative responsibility for the same obligor's third support order.
Only the first CSEA issues income withholding notices for the two support
orders to the obligor's employer. The employer subsequently sends in a
support payment without posting identifiers and remitter instructions cannot be
obtained. Only the two support orders from the first CSEA are considered
qualified support orders for the purposes of prorating the payment received
from the employer.

(D) When the collection is not a federal
income tax refund offset, OCS or the CSEA shall prorate the collection using
the following calculations:

(1) When the collection
is not sufficient to satisfy all of the unpaid monthly obligations owed on the
qualified support orders:

(a) First, add the unpaid monthly obligation for each qualified
support order to determine the total unpaid monthly obligation
amount;

(b) Then, for each qualified support order:

(i) Divide the unpaid
monthly obligation by the total unpaid monthly obligation amount to determine
the prorated percentage for the order; and

(ii) Multiply the
collection by the prorated percentage to determine the amount of the collection
to apply to the order.

(2) When the collection
is a lump sum payment and is not sufficient to satisfy the total arrears
obligations owed on the qualified support orders:

(a) First, add the arrears amount owed for each qualified support
order to determine the total arrears amount;

(b) Then, for each qualified support order:

(i) Divide the arrears
amount for each order by the total arrears amount to determine the prorated
percentage for each order; then

(ii) Multiply the
collection by the prorated percentage to determine the amount of the collection
to apply to the order.

(3) When the collection equals or exceeds
the unpaid monthly obligation for each qualified support order, satisfy the
unpaid monthly obligations for each qualified support order.

When the monthly obligations for each qualified
support order are satisfied and a balance remains from the collection that is
less than the total arrears owed on the qualified support orders:

(a) For each qualified support order, add the total unpaid
arrears and debts for the order to determine the outstanding amount owed on the
order;

(b) Add the outstanding amounts owed on each order to determine
the total outstanding amount owed;

(c) Divide the balance of the collection by the total outstanding
amount owed to determine the prorated percentage; and

(d) For each qualified support order, multiply the outstanding
amount owed on the order by the prorated percentage to determine the amount of
the balance to apply to the order.

(4) When all of the monthly obligations,
arrears, and debts are satisfied and funds remain from the collection, allocate
any remaining funds to the current obligation(s) for the future month(s), for
each qualified support order:

(a) First, add the monthly obligation for each qualified support
order to determine the total monthly obligation amount;

(b) Then, for each qualified support order:

(i) Divide the balance of
the collection by the total monthly obligation amount to determine the prorated
percentage; and

(ii) Multiply the monthly
obligation by the prorated percentage to determine the amount of the balance to
apply to the order.

(5) When the collection
is a lump sum payment, and the collection equals or exceeds the total amount of
arrears owed on the qualified support orders:

(a) Satisfy all of the arrears owed on the qualified support
orders, then

(b) When the arrears are satisfied, issue any remaining balance
in accordance with paragraph (C)(9) of rule 5101:12-80-10.1 of the
Administrative Code, unless the CSEA has negotiated an alternative allocation
with the obligor.

(E) When the collection is from a federal
tax refund offset, OCS or the CSEA shall prorate the collection using the
following calculations:

(1) When the collection
is not sufficient to satisfy all of the eligible arrears owed on the qualified
support orders:

(a) For each qualified support order, add the unpaid eligible
assigned arrears for the order to determine the outstanding assigned arrears
amount owed on the order;

(b) Add the outstanding assigned arrears amount owed on each
order to determine the total outstanding assigned arrears amount
owed;

(c) Divide the collection by the total outstanding assigned
arrears amount owed to determine the prorated percentage;

(d) For each qualified support order, multiply the outstanding
assigned arrears amount owed on the order by the prorated percentage to
determine the amount of the collection to apply to the order; and

(e) Repeat the process described in paragraphs (E)(1)(a) to
(E)(1)(d) of this rule for all eligible unassigned arrears owed on the
qualified support orders.

(2) When the collection
equals or exceeds the total amount of eligible arrears owed on the qualified
support orders:

(a) Satisfy all of the eligible arrears owed on the qualified
support orders, then

(b) When the eligible arrears are satisfied, issue any remaining
balance to the obligor, unless the CSEA has negotiated an alternative
allocation with the obligor in accordance with rule 5101:12-80-10.1 of the
Administrative Code.



Last updated July 7, 2021 at 1:46 PM


View Latest Dockets

Filed

Jan 24, 2020

Status

Dismissal

Judge

Hon. Sherry L. Glass Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Sherry L. Glass

Court

Lorain County

County

Lorain County, OH

View More Dockets

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 12 pages

STATE OF OHIO ) “ss ' IN THE COURT OF APPEALS DSi) <q ase, .., NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT Zane JUL 30 a; 9: 63 LINDA KELLY C.A. No. 27208 Appellant v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE DEPARTMENT OF JOBS & FAMILY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS SERVICES COUNTY OF SUMMIT, OHIO CASENo. CV 2013 06 3058 Appellee DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY Oo s La neo €& Dated: July 30, 2014 2 S = ga = GALLAGHER, Judge. 3 3 US) a = 1} Appellant, Linda Kelly, appeals from the judgment of the Summit Cou…

County

Summit County, OH

Filed Date

Jul 31, 2014

Category

ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL

Judge

TAMMY O'BRIEN

preview-icon 1 page

CSEA No. 7104097311 PORTAGE COUNTY IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. , PILED JUVENILE DIVISION . to7 PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO 72021 HOV 17 AAU parC etTH, JUDGES 3 COURT CATHY HOLIDAY comivion A DIYISION KEITH HOLIDAY Order No. 18 JCH 940 PLAINTIFFS JUDGE PATRICIA J. SMITH vs DANIELLE A. HORNIG NOTICE OF REVISED AMOUNT OF CHILD SUPPORT AND CASH DEFENDANT MEDICAL SUPPORT Pursuant to Ohio Revised Code Section 3119.63 the Portage County Job & Family Services, Child Support Division (herein after CSEA) s…

Case Filed

Oct 24, 2018

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Portage County, OH

Filed Date

Nov 17, 2021

Category

CHILD SUPPORT

Judge

BERGER, ROBERT W

preview-icon 1 page

CSEA No. 7105140961 T, NTY IN THE COURT OF COMMON pLRRG ASE E pus JUVENILE DIVISION PORTAGE COUNTY, OH?! NGY 22 PH 2: 62 piracy. SuiTH, JUDGE COMMON PLEAS COURT MIRANDA A. MARTIN Order No. 19 KEY ESSE DIVISION PLAINTIFF JUDGE PATRICIA J. SMITH vs DARNELL T. HINES, JR. NOTICE OF REVISED AMOUNT OF CHILD SUPPORT AND CASH DEFENDANT MEDICAL SUPPORT Pursuant to Ohio Revised Code Section 3119.63 the Portage County Job & Family Services, Child Support Division (herein after CSEA) submits this no…

Case Filed

Feb 20, 2019

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Portage County, OH

Filed Date

Nov 22, 2021

Category

CHILD SUPPORT

Judge

BERGER, ROBERT W

preview-icon 1 page

CSEA No. 7104340927 ' TDi = rok Ur COPY IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FILED JUVENILE DIVISION 5 . PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO 2021 NOV 15 AR 8: q coe SMITH, JUDGE AMIGN SLEAS COURT DINAH K. LAWRENCE , , TODD G. LAWRENCE / JUVENILE DIVISION Order No. 19 JCH 323 PLAINTIFFS JUDGE PATRICIA J. SMITH vs SARA N. LAWRENCE NOTICE OF REVISED AMOUNT OF , CHILD SUPPORT AND CASH DEFENDANT MEDICAL SUPPORT Pursuant to Ohio Revised Code Section 3119.63 the Portage County Job & Family Services, Child Support Div…

Case Filed

May 02, 2019

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Portage County, OH

Filed Date

Nov 15, 2021

Category

CHILD SUPPORT

Judge

BERGER, ROBERT W

preview-icon 1 page

CSEA No. 7104340885 PORTAGE COUNTY IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FILED JUVENILE DIVISION 297) ue . PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO Q21ROV IS AMT: 38 PATRA ota SMITH, JUDGE Coun oS COURT DINAH K. LAWRENCE JUVENILE DIVIQON TODD G. LAWRENCE Order No. 19 JCH 843 PLAINTIFFS JUDGE PATRICIA J. SMITH vs BRANDON R. TAYLOR NOTICE OF REVISED AMOUNT OF CHILD SUPPORT AND CASH DEFENDANT MEDICAL SUPPORT Pursuant to Ohio Revised Code Section 3119.63 the Portage County Job & Family Services, Child Support Division (her…

Case Filed

Nov 13, 2019

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Portage County, OH

Filed Date

Nov 15, 2021

Category

CHILD SUPPORT

Judge

BERGER, ROBERT W

View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope