Ohio Administrative Code|Rule 4757-31-03 | Valid reasons for accessing confidential personal information.

                                                

Pursuant to the requirements of division (B)(2) of section 1347.15 of the Revised Code, this rule contains a list of valid reasons, directly related to the board's exercise of its powers or duties, for which only employees of the board may access confidential personal information (CPI) regardless of whether the personal information system is a manual system or computer system:

(A) Performing the following functions constitute valid reasons for authorized employees of the board to access confidential personal information:

(1) Responding to a public records request;

(2) Responding to a request from an individual for the list of CPI the board maintains on that individual;

(3) Administering a constitutional provision or duty;

(4) Administering a statutory provision or duty;

(5) Administering an administrative rule provision or duty;

(6) Complying with any state or federal program requirements;

(7) Processing or payment of vendors billing;

(8) Auditing purposes;

(9) Licensure or registration processes;

(10) Investigation or law enforcement purposes;

(11) Administrative hearings;

(12) Litigation, complying with an order of the court, or subpoena;

(13) Human resource matters (e.g., hiring, promotion, demotion, discharge, salary/compensation issues, leave requests/issues, time card approvals/issues);

(14) Complying with an executive order or policy;

(15) Complying with a board policy or a state administrative policy issued by the department of administrative services, the office of budget and management or other similar state agency; or

(16) Complying with a collective bargaining agreement provision.

(B) To the extent that the general processes described in paragraph (A) of this rule do not cover the following circumstances, for the purpose of carrying out specific duties of the board, authorized employees would also have valid reasons for accessing CPI in these following circumstances:

(1) Board investigators and the executive director may review CPI of individuals who are subject to investigation for alleged misconduct that may result in licensure or registration discipline. Such employees may review CPI of individuals who are not the subject of the investigation, but who otherwise may be witnesses with information related to the investigation. CPI may be reviewed by such employees and members of the board in professional conduct matters that become the subject of administrative hearings.

(2) Employees assigned to the continuing education audit may review CPI of licensees and registrants who are being audited for the purpose of carrying out that program.

(3) Employees assigned to registration, certification and licensure may review CPI of persons who hold or are applying for a license or registration issued by the board for the purpose of carrying out the counselor, social worker or marriage and family therapist licensing program.

(4) Employees assigned to the renewal section may review CPI of persons who are applying for renewal of a license or registration issued by the board for the purpose of carrying out the counselor, social worker or marriage and family therapist licensing program.

(5) Employees assigned to fiscal and human resource positions may review CPI of vendors billing the board for services rendered and employees of the board for payroll and other human resource activities for the purpose of carrying out the counselor, social worker or marriage and family therapist board's daily activities.

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 11 pages

Jul-08-2005 12:46 From-ATTORNEY GENERAL HHS 614-466-6090 T-790 P.002 F-470 I~ (atin IN THE COURT_OF COMMON PLEAS JEFFREY MORGAN, SE NO. 2005-1257 Appellant, v. DGE MICHAEL L. TUCKER OHIO COUNSELOR, SOCL MARRIAGE AND FAMILY BOARD, Appellant. BRIEF OF APPELLEE, OHIO COUNSELOR, SOCIAL WORKER A MARRIAGE AND FAMILY THERAPIST BOARD L INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court pursuant to the administrative appeal, filed by Appellant Jeffrey Morgan (hereinafter “Morgan”), of the January 21, 20…

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Jul 05, 2005

Category

ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL

preview-icon 7 pages

Fee elnmenuey 23.18. 1: NOTice oF APPEAL TO THE COURT OF f _ COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO i, FROM AN ADJUDICATION ORDER OF THE ‘'€). QHIO COUNSELOR, SOCIAL WORKER, AND MARRIAGE AND FAMILY THERAPIST BOARD STATE OF OHIO COUNSELOR AND SOCIAL WORKER BOARD IN THE MATTER OF THE ELIGIBILITY OF JEFFREY L. MORGAN TO MAINTAIN LICENSURE AS A PROFESSIONAL CLINICAL COUNSELOR IN THE STATE OF OHIO. caseno, Q22-/2S7 JUDGE NOTICE OF APPEAL Pursuant to Ohio Revised Code Section 119.12, Not…

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Feb 16, 2005

Category

ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL

preview-icon 6 pages

Crossman & ‘McNamee, tic 2625 Commons Boulevard ‘Beavercreek, Ohio 45431-3704 (937) 424-3660 (937) 424-3665 fax IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO Domestic Relations Division TODD J. DYER 7 CASE NO. 2016 LS 0008 1839 Mellow Drive (Judge Wood) Miamisburg, Ohio 45342 * DOB: 08/01/1977 * Plaintiff DEFENDANT’S MOTION * IN LIMINE AND REQUEST vs. FOR REAPPOINTMENT * OF PSCHOLOGIST FOR SARAH K. DYER PSYCHOLOGICAL 4335 Kiwi Court * EVALUATION Miamisburg, Ohio 45342…

Case Filed

Jul 01, 2016

Case Status

REOPENED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Jul 30, 2018

Category

LEGAL SEPARATION WITH CHILDREN

preview-icon 8 pages

D9223 - D75 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO JESSICA SMITH-EVANS, Case No. 07 CV 005921 " Refiled Case No. 08 CV 10814 Plaintiff, v. Judge Pieitfer LISA LAVELLE and HOLLY SMITH " MOTION 11 :@lWd 61 INV 402 Ag-$1uno2 39 ywyat MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE OPPOSITION TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT Now here comes Plaintiff Jessica Smith-Evans in opposition of the SUMMARY JUDGMENT and Motion for Relicf From Judgment pursuant to Rule 60 (B) of the Ohio…

Case Filed

May 01, 2007

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Franklin County, OH

Filed Date

Aug 19, 2009

Judge Hon. MARK A SERROTT Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for MARK A SERROTT
preview-icon 17 pages

p9213 - E85 PILED COMMON PLEAS COURT IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO4NALIN CO. OHIO JESSICA SMITH-EVANS, : Case No. 07 CV 005921 20 AUG TK PM 4:59 : cL Refiled Case No. 08 CV Hida” OF COURTS Plaintiff, : v. : Judge Pfeiffer tn LISA LAVELLE and HOLLY SMITH Defendants. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN "AMENDED COMPLAINT AND MOTION TO JOIN COMPDRUG AS A DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT AND MOTION TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT AND MOTION TO JOIN COMPDRUG AS A DEFENDANT IN AMENDED COMPL…

Case Filed

Jan 07, 2008

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Franklin County, OH

Filed Date

Aug 14, 2009

Judge Hon. MARK A SERROTT Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for MARK A SERROTT
View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope